Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 3/2009

01-06-2009 | Rapid Communication

Moving Mammogram-Reluctant Women to Screening: A Pilot Study

Authors: Mary E. Costanza, M.D., Roger Luckmann, M.D., M.P.H., Mary Jo White, M.S., M.P.H., Milagros C. Rosal, Ph.D., Nancy LaPelle, Ph.D., Caroline Cranos, M.P.H.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Effective interventions are needed for women long overdue for screening mammography.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to pilot test an intervention for motivating overdue women to receive a mammogram.

Methods

Subjects aged 45–79 without a mammogram in ≥27 months and enrolled in study practices were identified from claims data. The intervention included a mailed, educational booklet, computer-assisted barrier-specific tailored counseling and motivational interviewing, and facilitated, short-interval mammography scheduling.

Results

Of 127 eligible women, 45 (35.4%) agreed to counseling and data collection. Most were ≥3 years overdue. Twenty-six (57.8%) of the counseled women got a mammogram within 12 months. Thirty-one (72.1%) of 43 counseled women moved ≥1 stage closer to screening, based on a modified Precaution Adoption Process Model.

Conclusion

It is feasible to reach and counsel women who are long overdue for a mammogram and to advance their stage of adoption. The intervention should be formally evaluated in a prospective trial comparing it to control or to proven interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nystrom L, Rutquist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: An overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet. 1993;341:973-978.PubMedCrossRef Nystrom L, Rutquist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: An overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet. 1993;341:973-978.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jonsson H, Tornberg S, Nystrom L, Lenner P. Service screening with mammography of women aged 70–74 years in Sweden: Effects on breast cancer mortality. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(5):360-369.PubMedCrossRef Jonsson H, Tornberg S, Nystrom L, Lenner P. Service screening with mammography of women aged 70–74 years in Sweden: Effects on breast cancer mortality. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(5):360-369.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Breslau ES. Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening. Cancer. 2004;1(5 Suppl):1118-1130.CrossRef Rakowski W, Breslau ES. Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening. Cancer. 2004;1(5 Suppl):1118-1130.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of mammograms among women aged >/= 40 years—United States, 2000–2005. MMWR. 2007;56(3):49-51. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of mammograms among women aged >/= 40 years—United States, 2000–2005. MMWR. 2007;56(3):49-51.
5.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States: 2001. U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States: 2001.
6.
go back to reference Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007;109:2405-2409.PubMedCrossRef Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007;109:2405-2409.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity. Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening and National Health Interview Studies. JAMA. 1990;264(1):54-55.CrossRef NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity. Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening and National Health Interview Studies. JAMA. 1990;264(1):54-55.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Costanza ME. The extent of breast cancer screening in older women. Cancer. 1994;74(7 suppl):2046-2050.PubMedCrossRef Costanza ME. The extent of breast cancer screening in older women. Cancer. 1994;74(7 suppl):2046-2050.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clemow L, Costanza ME, Haddad WP, et al. Underutilizers of mammography screening today: Characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(1):80-88.PubMedCrossRef Clemow L, Costanza ME, Haddad WP, et al. Underutilizers of mammography screening today: Characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(1):80-88.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rimer BK, Ross E, Cristinzio CS, King E. Older women's participation in breast screening. Gerontology. 1992;47:85-91. Rimer BK, Ross E, Cristinzio CS, King E. Older women's participation in breast screening. Gerontology. 1992;47:85-91.
11.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(3):223-228.PubMedCrossRef Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(3):223-228.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Burton MV, Warren R, Price D, Earl H. Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations. Br J Cancer. 1998;77(11):2014-2019.PubMed Burton MV, Warren R, Price D, Earl H. Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations. Br J Cancer. 1998;77(11):2014-2019.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted towards patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:749-757.PubMed Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted towards patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:749-757.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Legler J, Breen N, Meissner H, et al. Predicting patterns of mammography use: A geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(4):929-947.PubMedCrossRef Legler J, Breen N, Meissner H, et al. Predicting patterns of mammography use: A geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(4):929-947.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, DiClemente C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390-393.PubMedCrossRef Prochaska JO, DiClemente C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390-393.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference LaPelle N, Costanza ME, Luckmann R, et al. Staging mammography non-adherent women: A qualitative study. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(2):114-121.PubMedCrossRef LaPelle N, Costanza ME, Luckmann R, et al. Staging mammography non-adherent women: A qualitative study. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(2):114-121.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Miller W, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford; 1991. Miller W, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford; 1991.
19.
go back to reference Rosal MC, Ebbeling CB, Ockene JK, et al. Facilitating dietary change: The patient-centered counseling model. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(3):332-341.PubMedCrossRef Rosal MC, Ebbeling CB, Ockene JK, et al. Facilitating dietary change: The patient-centered counseling model. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(3):332-341.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Emmons KM, Hammond K, Fava JL, et al. A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):18-24.PubMedCrossRef Emmons KM, Hammond K, Fava JL, et al. A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):18-24.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Emmons KM, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing in health care settings: Opportunities and limitations. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):68-74.PubMedCrossRef Emmons KM, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing in health care settings: Opportunities and limitations. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):68-74.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Luckmann R, et al. Promoting mammography: Results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(1):39-46.PubMedCrossRef Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Luckmann R, et al. Promoting mammography: Results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(1):39-46.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference White MJ, Stark JR, Luckmann R, et al. Implementing a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system to increase colorectal cancer screening: A process evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:419-428.PubMedCrossRef White MJ, Stark JR, Luckmann R, et al. Implementing a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system to increase colorectal cancer screening: A process evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:419-428.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, et al. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37(2):125-140.PubMedCrossRef Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, et al. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37(2):125-140.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Taplin SB, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: A randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):233-242.PubMedCrossRef Taplin SB, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: A randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):233-242.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857-872.PubMedCrossRef Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857-872.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Moving Mammogram-Reluctant Women to Screening: A Pilot Study
Authors
Mary E. Costanza, M.D.
Roger Luckmann, M.D., M.P.H.
Mary Jo White, M.S., M.P.H.
Milagros C. Rosal, Ph.D.
Nancy LaPelle, Ph.D.
Caroline Cranos, M.P.H.
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9107-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 3/2009 Go to the issue