Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers

Authors: Youngmee Kim, Ph.D., Deborah A. Kashy, Ph.D., David K. Wellisch, Ph.D., Rachel L. Spillers, B.S., Chiew Kwei Kaw, M.S., Tenbroeck G. Smith, M.A.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Although evidence suggests that survivors and spousal caregivers tend to experience somewhat similar levels of distress and that the survivor’s distress affects his/her own quality of life, the degree to which each person’s distress has an independent effect on their partner’s quality of life is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to examine the dyadic effects of psychological distress on the quality of life of couples dealing with cancer.

Methods

A total of 168 married survivor–caregiver dyads participating in the American Cancer Society’s Study of Cancer Survivors-I and Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers provided complete data for study variables. Participating survivors were diagnosed with either breast or prostate cancer approximately 2 years prior to participating in the study.

Results

Using the Actor Partner Interdependence Model, results revealed that although each person’s psychological distress is the strongest predictor of their own quality of life, partner’s distress and (dis)similarity in distress of the couple also play significant roles in one’s quality of life. In addition, the adverse effect of having a partner who is less emotionally resourceful was especially pronounced on men’s physical health.

Conclusions

Our systematic investigation provided valuable evidence for identifying the subgroup of cancer survivors and their spouses who are vulnerable to poor quality of life due to their mutual psychological distress. These findings suggest that couples may benefit from interventions that enhance their ability to manage psychological distress, particularly the wife’s, which may improve the mental and physical health of both partners when they are dealing with cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Hughes SL, Giobbie-Hurder A, Weaver FM, et al. Relationship between caregiver burden and health-related quality of life. Gerontologist. 1999; 39: 534–545.PubMed Hughes SL, Giobbie-Hurder A, Weaver FM, et al. Relationship between caregiver burden and health-related quality of life. Gerontologist. 1999; 39: 534–545.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 738–746.PubMed Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 738–746.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Baider L, Cooper C, De-Nour AK. Cancer and the Family. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. Baider L, Cooper C, De-Nour AK. Cancer and the Family. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.
5.
go back to reference Hodges LJ, Humphris GM, Macfarlane G. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 1–12.PubMedCrossRef Hodges LJ, Humphris GM, Macfarlane G. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 1–12.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nordin K, Berglund G, Glimelius B, et al. Predicting anxiety and depression among cancer patients: a clinical model. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 376–384.PubMedCrossRef Nordin K, Berglund G, Glimelius B, et al. Predicting anxiety and depression among cancer patients: a clinical model. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 376–384.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roth A, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, et al. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 82: 1904–1908.PubMedCrossRef Roth A, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, et al. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 82: 1904–1908.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vanderwerker LC, Laff RE, Kadan-Lottick NS, et al. Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use among caregivers of advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 6899–6907.PubMedCrossRef Vanderwerker LC, Laff RE, Kadan-Lottick NS, et al. Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use among caregivers of advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 6899–6907.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 1517–1524.PubMedCrossRef Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 1517–1524.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, et al. Couples’ adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis 18. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 37–48.CrossRef Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, et al. Couples’ adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis 18. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 37–48.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Manne SL. Cancer in the marital context: a review of the literature. Cancer Investig. 1998; 16: 188–202.CrossRef Manne SL. Cancer in the marital context: a review of the literature. Cancer Investig. 1998; 16: 188–202.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Manne SL. Coping and social support. In: Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Geller PA, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Health Psychology, vol. 9. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2003: 51–74. Manne SL. Coping and social support. In: Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Geller PA, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Health Psychology, vol. 9. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2003: 51–74.
13.
go back to reference Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Felgoise SH, et al. Project Genesis: assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 1036–1048.PubMedCrossRef Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Felgoise SH, et al. Project Genesis: assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 1036–1048.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer. 1999; 86: 577–588.PubMedCrossRef Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer. 1999; 86: 577–588.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim Y, Schulz R, Carver CS. Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience. Psychosom Med. 2007; 69: 283–291.PubMedCrossRef Kim Y, Schulz R, Carver CS. Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience. Psychosom Med. 2007; 69: 283–291.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holland JC, Reznick I. Pathways for psychosocial care of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005; 104: 2624–2637.PubMedCrossRef Holland JC, Reznick I. Pathways for psychosocial care of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005; 104: 2624–2637.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006.
18.
19.
go back to reference Kim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. Journal of Aging and Health. 2007 (in press). Kim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. Journal of Aging and Health. 2007 (in press).
20.
go back to reference Hagedoorn M, Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, et al. Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 274–282.PubMedCrossRef Hagedoorn M, Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, et al. Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 274–282.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brown SL, Nesse RM, Vinokur AD, et al. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14: 320–327.PubMedCrossRef Brown SL, Nesse RM, Vinokur AD, et al. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14: 320–327.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Manne SL, Ostroff J, Sherman M, et al. Buffering effects of family and friend support on associations between partner unsupportive behaviors and coping among women with breast cancer. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2003; 20: 771–792.CrossRef Manne SL, Ostroff J, Sherman M, et al. Buffering effects of family and friend support on associations between partner unsupportive behaviors and coping among women with breast cancer. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2003; 20: 771–792.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gilbar O. Gender as a predictor of burden and psychological distress of elderly husbands and wives of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncol. 1999; 8: 287–294.CrossRef Gilbar O. Gender as a predictor of burden and psychological distress of elderly husbands and wives of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncol. 1999; 8: 287–294.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Given B, Wyatt G, Given C, et al. Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004; 31: 1105–1117.PubMedCrossRef Given B, Wyatt G, Given C, et al. Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004; 31: 1105–1117.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hagedoorn M, Buunk BP, Kuijer RG, et al. Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psycho-Oncol. 2000; 9: 232–242.CrossRef Hagedoorn M, Buunk BP, Kuijer RG, et al. Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psycho-Oncol. 2000; 9: 232–242.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Foxall MJ, Gaston-Johansson F. Burden and health outcomes of family caregivers of hospitalized bone marrow transplant patients. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24: 915–923.PubMedCrossRef Foxall MJ, Gaston-Johansson F. Burden and health outcomes of family caregivers of hospitalized bone marrow transplant patients. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24: 915–923.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G, et al. Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55: 453–460.PubMedCrossRef Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G, et al. Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55: 453–460.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Smith T, Stein KD, Mehta CC, et al. The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2007; 109: 1–12.PubMedCrossRef Smith T, Stein KD, Mehta CC, et al. The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2007; 109: 1–12.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994. Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
31.
go back to reference Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. Amos Users’ Guide, Version 6.0. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation; 2005. Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. Amos Users’ Guide, Version 6.0. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation; 2005.
32.
go back to reference Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993: 111–135. Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993: 111–135.
33.
go back to reference Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL VI User's Guide. (3rd). Mooresville, IL: Scientific Software; 1984. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL VI User's Guide. (3rd). Mooresville, IL: Scientific Software; 1984.
34.
go back to reference Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1–55.CrossRef Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1–55.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, et al. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psycho-Oncol. 2002; 11: 273–281.CrossRef Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, et al. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psycho-Oncol. 2002; 11: 273–281.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference McNair DM, Neuchert JWP. Profile of Mood States: Technical Updates. Multi-Health Systems, Inc., 2005. McNair DM, Neuchert JWP. Profile of Mood States: Technical Updates. Multi-Health Systems, Inc., 2005.
37.
go back to reference Coyne JC, Smith DA. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61: 404–412.PubMedCrossRef Coyne JC, Smith DA. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61: 404–412.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hooker K, Manoogian-O'Dell M, Monahan DJ, et al. Does type of disease matter? Gender differences among Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease spouse caregivers. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 568–573.PubMed Hooker K, Manoogian-O'Dell M, Monahan DJ, et al. Does type of disease matter? Gender differences among Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease spouse caregivers. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 568–573.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Miller B, Cafasso L. Gender differences in caregiving: fact or artifact. Gerontologist. 1992; 32: 498–507.PubMed Miller B, Cafasso L. Gender differences in caregiving: fact or artifact. Gerontologist. 1992; 32: 498–507.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Yee JL, Schulz R. Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity among family caregivers: a review and analysis. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 147–164.PubMed Yee JL, Schulz R. Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity among family caregivers: a review and analysis. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 147–164.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton T, Cacioppo JT, et al. Marital conflict and endocrine function: are men really more physiologically affected than women? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996; 64: 324–332.PubMedCrossRef Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton T, Cacioppo JT, et al. Marital conflict and endocrine function: are men really more physiologically affected than women? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996; 64: 324–332.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Baider L, Koch U, Esacson R, et al. Prospective study of cancer patients and their spouses: the weakness of marital strength. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 49–56.CrossRef Baider L, Koch U, Esacson R, et al. Prospective study of cancer patients and their spouses: the weakness of marital strength. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 49–56.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Burman B, Margolin G. Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 39–63.PubMedCrossRef Burman B, Margolin G. Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 39–63.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001; 127: 472–503.PubMedCrossRef Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001; 127: 472–503.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Shumaker SA, Hill DR. Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 102–111.PubMedCrossRef Shumaker SA, Hill DR. Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 102–111.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Andrykowski MA, Manne SL. Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? I. Standards and levels of evidence. Annals Behav Med. 2006; 32: 93–97.CrossRef Andrykowski MA, Manne SL. Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? I. Standards and levels of evidence. Annals Behav Med. 2006; 32: 93–97.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74: 1143–1152.PubMedCrossRef Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74: 1143–1152.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers
Authors
Youngmee Kim, Ph.D.
Deborah A. Kashy, Ph.D.
David K. Wellisch, Ph.D.
Rachel L. Spillers, B.S.
Chiew Kwei Kaw, M.S.
Tenbroeck G. Smith, M.A.
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9026-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2/2008 Go to the issue