Top

Published in:

01-07-2012 | Review article

The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review

Authors: Giorgio Treglia, Elisabetta Giovannini, Davide Di Franco, Maria Lucia Calcagni, Vittoria Rufini, Maria Picchio, Alessandro Giordano

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 6/2012

Abstract

To systematically review published data on the role of positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) using either Carbon-11 (¹¹C) or Fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) choline tracer in tumors other than prostatic cancer. A comprehensive literature search of studies published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases through January 2012 and regarding ¹¹C-choline or ¹⁸F-choline PET or PET/CT in patients with tumors other than prostatic cancer was carried out. Fifty-two studies comprising 1800 patients were included and discussed. Brain tumors were evaluated in 15 articles, head and neck tumors in 6, thoracic tumors (including lung and mediastinal neoplasms) in 14, liver tumors (including hepatocellular carcinoma) in 5, gynecologic malignancies (including breast tumors) in 5, bladder and upper urinary tract tumors in 5, and musculoskeletal tumors in 7. Radiolabeled choline PET or PET/CT is useful to differentiate high-grade from low-grade gliomas and malignant from benign brain lesions, to early detect brain tumor recurrences and to guide the stereotactic biopsy sampling. The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled choline PET is superior compared to Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET in this setting. Radiolabeled choline PET or PET/CT seems to be accurate in differential diagnosis between malignant and benign thoracic lesions and in staging lung tumors; nevertheless, a superiority of radiolabeled choline compared to ¹⁸F-FDG has not been demonstrated in this setting, except for the detection of brain metastases. Few but significant studies on radiolabeled choline PET and PET/CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and musculoskeletal tumors are reported in the literature. The combination of radiolabeled choline and ¹⁸F-FDG PET increases the detection rate of HCC. The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled choline PET or PET/CT seems to be superior compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT and conventional imaging methods in patients with bone and soft tissue tumors. Limited experience exists about the role of radiolabeled choline PET and PET/CT in patients with head and neck tumors, bladder cancer and gynecologic malignancies including breast cancer.

Chen K, Chen X. Positron emission tomography imaging of cancer biology: current status and future prospects. Semin Oncol. 2011;38:70–86.PubMedCrossRef

Chiti A, Picchio M. The rising PET: the increasing use of choline PET/CT in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imagin. 2011;38:53–4.CrossRef

Mertens K, Slaets D, Lambert B, Acou M, De Vos F, Goethals I. PET with (18)F-labelled choline-based tracers for tumour imaging: a review of the literature. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2188–93.PubMedCrossRef

Nanni C, Rubello D, Fanti S. Could choline PET play a role in malignancies other than prostate cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:216–8.PubMedCrossRef

Picchio M, Giovannini E, Messa C. The role of PET/computed tomography scan in the management of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21:230–6.PubMedCrossRef

Bauman G, Belhocine T, Kovacs M, Ward A, Beheshti M, Rachinsky I. (18)F-fluorocholine for prostate cancer imaging: a systematic review of the literature. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15:45–55.PubMedCrossRef

Zeisel SH, Blusztajn JK. Choline and human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:269–96.PubMedCrossRef

Podo F. Tumour phospholipid metabolism. NMR Biomed. 1999;12:413–39.PubMedCrossRef

Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM. Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:835–48.PubMed

10.

DeGrado TR, Baldwin SW, Wang S, Orr MD, Liao RP, Friedman HS, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of (18)F-labeled choline analogs as oncologic PET tracers. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(12):1805–14.PubMed

11.

Hara T, Kosaka N, Shinoura N, Kondo T. PET imaging of brain tumor with [methyl-11C]choline. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:842–7.PubMed

12.

Ohtani T, Kurihara H, Ishiuchi S, Saito N, Oriuchi N, Inoue T, et al. Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1664–70.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Utriainen M, Komu M, Vuorinen V, Lehikoinen P, Sonninen P, Kurki T, et al. Evaluation of brain tumor metabolism with [11C]choline PET and 1H-MRS. J Neurooncol. 2003;62:329–38.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hara T, Kondo T, Hara T, Kosaka N. Use of 18F-choline and 11C-choline as contrast agents in positron emission tomography imaging-guided stereotactic biopsy sampling of gliomas. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:474–9.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Tian M, Zhang H, Oriuchi N, Higuchi T, Endo K. Comparison of 11C-choline PET and FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1064–72.PubMed

16.

Tian M, Zhang H, Higuchi T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Oncological diagnosis using (11)C-choline-positron emission tomography in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F] fluoro-d-glucose-positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:172–9.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Kwee SA, Ko JP, Jiang CS, Watters MR, Coel MN. Solitary brain lesions enhancing at MR imaging: evaluation with fluorine 18 fluorocholine PET. Radiology. 2007;244:557–65.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Huang Z, Zuo C, Guan Y, Zhang Z, Liu P, Xue F, et al. Misdiagnoses of 11C-choline combined with 18F-FDG PET imaging in brain tumours. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:354–8.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Kato T, Shinoda J, Nakayama N, Miwa K, Okumura A, Yano H, et al. Metabolic assessment of gliomas using 11C-methionine, [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose, and 11C-choline positron-emission tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1176–82.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Giovacchini G, Fallanca F, Landoni C, Gianolli L, Picozzi P, Attuati L, et al. C-11 choline versus F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose for imaging meningiomas: an initial experience. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:7–10.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Takenaka S, Shinoda J, Asano Y, Aki T, Miwa K, Ito T, et al. Metabolic assessment of monofocal acute inflammatory demyelination using MR spectroscopy and (11)C-methionine-, (11)C-choline-, and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. B. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011;28:229–38.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Rottenburger C, Hentschel M, Kelly T, Trippel M, Brink I, Reithmeier T, et al. Comparison of C-11 methionine and C-11 choline for PET imaging of brain metastases: a prospective pilot study. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:639–42.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Tan H, Chen L, Guan Y, Lin X. Comparison of MRI, F-18 FDG, and 11C-choline PET/CT for their potentials in differentiating brain tumor recurrence from brain tumor necrosis following radiotherapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:978–81.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Roelcke U, Bruehlmeier M, Hefti M, Hundsberger T, Nitzsche EU. F-18 choline PET does not detect increased metabolism in F-18 fluoroethyltyrosine-negative low-grade gliomas. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:e1–3.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Li FM, Nie Q, Wang RM, Chang SM, Zhao WR, Zhu Q, et al. (11)C-CHO PET in optimization of target volume delineation and treatment regimens in postoperative radiotherapy for brain gliomas. Nucl Med Biol 2012;39:437–42.

26.

Ninomiya H, Oriuchi N, Kahn N, Higuchi T, Endo K, Takahashi K, et al. Diagnosis of tumor in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses with [11C]choline PET: comparative study with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:29–34.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Khan N, Oriuchi N, Ninomiya H, Higuchi T, Kamada H, Endo K. Positron emission tomographic imaging with 11C-choline in differential diagnosis of head and neck tumors: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:409–17.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Ito K, Yokoyama J, Kubota K, Morooka M, Shiibashi M, Matsuda H. 18F-FDG versus 11C-choline PET/CT for the imaging of advanced head and neck cancer after combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy: the time period during which PET/CT can reliably detect non-recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1318–27.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Ito K, Yokoyama J, Kubota K, Morooka M. Comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-choline PET/CT for detecting recurrences in patients with nonsquamous cell head and neck malignancies. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:931–7.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Wu HB, Wang QS, Wang MF, Zhen X, Zhou WL, Li HS. Preliminary study of 11C-choline PET/CT for T staging of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:341–6.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kobori O, Kirihara Y, Kosaka N, Hara T. Positron emission tomography of esophageal carcinoma using (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a novel method of preoperative lymph node staging. Cancer. 1999;86:1638–48.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Jager PL, Que TH, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, Elsinga P, Plukker JT. Carbon-11 choline or FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer? Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1845–9.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Liu Q, Peng ZM, Liu QW, Yao SZ, Zhang L, Meng L, et al. The role of 11C-choline positron emission tomography-computed tomography and videomediastinoscopy in the evaluation of diseases of middle mediastinum. Chin Med J. 2006;119:634–9.PubMed

34.

Peng ZM, Liu Q, Liu QW, Yao SZ, Meng L, Liu Q, et al. The value of dual time point 11C-choline PET-CT in differentiating malignant from benign lesion of mediastinum. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87:3317–20.PubMed

35.

Hara T, Inagaki K, Kosaka N, Morita T. Sensitive detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer with 11C-choline PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1507–13.PubMed

36.

Pieterman RM, Que TH, Elsinga PH, Pruim J, van Putten JW, Willemsen AT, et al. Comparison of (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG PET in primary diagnosis and staging of patients with thoracic cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:167–72.PubMed

37.

Khan N, Oriuchi N, Zhang H, Higuchi T, Tian M, Inoue T, et al. A comparative study of 11C-choline PET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the evaluation of lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:359–66.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Hara T, Kosaka N, Suzuki T, Kudo K, Niino H. Uptake rates of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-choline in lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis: a positron emission tomography study. Chest. 2003;124:893–901.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wang T, Sun YE, Yao SL, Yu CH, Yin DY, Tian JH. Value of carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography in patients with pulmonary abnormalities. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44:405–8.PubMed

40.

Wang T, Sun YE, Chu XY, Yao SL, Yang B, Tian JH, et al. Positron emission tomography with special tracers in pulmonary abnormalities. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010;48:99–102.PubMed

41.

Balogova S, Huchet V, Kerrou K, Nataf V, Gutman F, Antoine M, et al. Detection of bronchioloalveolar cancer by means of PET/CT and 18F-fluorocholine, and comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:389–97.PubMed

42.

Peng Z, Liu Q, Li M, Han M, Yao S, Liu Q. Comparison of (11)C-choline PET/CT and enhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary abnormalities and locoregional lymph node involvement in lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2011.09.005.

43.

Talbot JN, Gutman F, Fartoux L, Grange JD, Ganne N, Kerrou K, et al. PET/CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using [(18)F]fluorocholine: preliminary comparison with [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(11):1285–9.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kameyama R, Okano K, Kashiwagi H, Deguchi A, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1245–8.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Talbot JN, Fartoux L, Balogova S, Nataf V, Kerrou K, Gutman F, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with PET/CT: a prospective comparison of 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-FDG in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1699–706.PubMedCrossRef

46.

van den Esschert JW, Bieze M, Beuers UH, van Gulik TM, Bennink RJ. Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:436–40.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Wu HB, Wang QS, Li BY, Li HS, Zhou WL, Wang QY. F-18 FDG in conjunction with 11C-choline PET/CT in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:1092–7.PubMedCrossRef

48.

de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, Jongen MM, Mensink HJ, Vaalburg W. Visualisation of bladder cancer using (11)C-choline PET: first clinical experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1283–8.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Picchio M, Treiber U, Beer AJ, Metz S, Bössner P, van Randenborgh H, et al. Value of 11C-choline PET and contrast-enhanced CT for staging of bladder cancer: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:938–44.PubMed

50.

Gofrit ON, Mishani E, Orevi M, Klein M, Freedman N, Pode D, et al. Contribution of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to preoperative staging of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2006;176:940–4.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Kübler H, Opercan K, Schmidt S, Herrmann K, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional computed tomography in lymph node staging of patients with bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1031–38.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Golan S, Sopov V, Baniel J, Groshar D. Comparison of 11C-choline with 18F-FDG in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for staging urothelial carcinoma: a prospective study. J Urol. 2011;186:436–41.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Torizuka T, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, Okada H, Yoshikawa E, Nakamura F, et al. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1051–6.PubMed

54.

Sofue K, Tateishi U, Sawada M, Maeda T, Terauchi T, Kano D, et al. Role of carbon-11 choline PET/CT in the management of uterine carcinoma: initial experience. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:235–43.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Contractor KB, Kenny LM, Stebbing J, Al-Nahhas A, Palmieri C, Sinnett D, et al. [11C]choline positron emission tomography in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5503–10.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Kenny LM, Contractor KB, Hinz R, Stebbing J, Palmieri C, Jiang J, et al. Reproducibility of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography and effect of trastuzumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4236–45.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Contractor KB, Kenny LM, Stebbing J, Challapalli A, Al-Nahhas A, Palmieri C, et al. Biological basis of [¹¹C]choline-positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: comparison with [¹⁸F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:997–1004.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Zhang H, Tian M, Oriuchi N, Higuchi T, Watanabe H, Aoki J, et al. 11C-choline PET for the detection of bone and soft tissue tumours in comparison with FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:273–9.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Tian M, Zhang H, Endo K. Comparison of cell proliferation, protein, and glucose metabolism in musculoskeletal tumors in a PET study. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:807929.PubMed

60.

Yanagawa T, Watanabe H, Inoue T, Ahmed AR, Tomiyoshi K, Shinozaki T, et al. Carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography in musculoskeletal tumors: comparison with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:175–82.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Tateishi U, Yamaguchi U, Maeda T, Seki K, Terauchi T, Kawai A, et al. Staging performance of carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma: comparison with conventional imaging. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1125–8.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Nanni C, Zamagni E, Cavo M, Rubello D, Tacchetti P, Pettinato C, et al. 11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:68.PubMedCrossRef

Title: The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review
Authors: Giorgio Treglia
Elisabetta Giovannini
Davide Di Franco
Maria Lucia Calcagni
Vittoria Rufini
Maria Picchio
Alessandro Giordano
Publication date: 01-07-2012
Publisher: Springer Japan
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0602-7

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

New semi-quantitative 123I-MIBG estimation method compared with scoring system in follow-up of advanced neuroblastoma: utility of total MIBG retention ratio versus scoring method

EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in patients with painful bone metastases of prostate cancer treated with strontium-89 radionuclide therapy

Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with colorectal cancer: clinical value of early delayed scanning

Detection of recurrent prostate cancer with 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in relation to PSA level at the time of imaging

18F-FLT PET performs better than 18F-FDG PET in differentiating malignant uterine corpus tumors from benign leiomyoma

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma with diffuse FDG uptake in the lung by 18FDG-PET/CT without chest CT findings