Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Original article

Usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality in breast cancer patients with dense breast: a comparative study with MRI

Author: Bom Sahn Kim

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive benefits of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer patients with dense breasts.

Methods

This study included a total of 66 patients (44.1 ± 8.2 years) with dense breasts (breast density >50%) and already biopsy-confirmed breast cancer. All of the patients underwent BSGI and MRI as part of an adjunct modality before the initial therapy. Of 66 patients, the 97 undetermined breast lesions were newly detected and correlated with the biopsy results.

Results

Twenty-six of the 97 breast lesions proved to be malignant tumors (invasive ductal cancer, n = 16; ductal carcinoma in situ, n = 6; mixed or other malignancies, n = 4); the remaining 71 lesions were diagnosed as benign tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 88.8% (confidence interval (CI), 69.8–97.6%) and 90.1% (CI, 80.7–95.9%), respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 92.3% (CI, 74.9–99.1%) and 39.4% (CI, 28.0–51.7%), respectively (p < 0.0001). MRI detected 43 false-positive breast lesions, 37 (86.0%) of which were correctly diagnosed as benign lesions using BSGI. In 12 malignant lesions <1 cm, the sensitivities of BSGI and MR imaging were 83.3% (CI, 51.6–97.9%) and 91.7% (CI, 61.5–99.8%), respectively.

Conclusion

BSGI showed an equivocal sensitivity and a high specificity compared to MRI in the diagnosis of breast lesions. In addition, BSGI had a good sensitivity in discriminating breast cancers ≤1 cm. The results of this study suggest that BSGI could play a crucial role as an adjunctive imaging modality which can be used to evaluate breast cancer patients with dense breasts.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183, 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998;209:511–8.PubMed Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183, 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998;209:511–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Anastassiades O, Iakovou E, Stavridou N, Gogas J, Karameris A. Multicentricity in breast cancer. A study of 366 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;99:238–43.PubMed Anastassiades O, Iakovou E, Stavridou N, Gogas J, Karameris A. Multicentricity in breast cancer. A study of 366 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;99:238–43.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Vaidya JS, Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Merchant N, Sharma OP, Mittra I. Multicentricity of breast cancer: whole-organ analysis and clinical implications. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:820–4.PubMedCrossRef Vaidya JS, Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Merchant N, Sharma OP, Mittra I. Multicentricity of breast cancer: whole-organ analysis and clinical implications. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:820–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Drew PJ, Turnbull LW, Chatterjee S, Read J, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions. Ann Surg. 1999;230:680–5.PubMedCrossRef Drew PJ, Turnbull LW, Chatterjee S, Read J, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions. Ann Surg. 1999;230:680–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Iagaru A, Masamed R, Keesara S, Conti PS. Breast MRI and 18F FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:33–8.PubMedCrossRef Iagaru A, Masamed R, Keesara S, Conti PS. Breast MRI and 18F FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:33–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Mena I, Jouanne E, Diggles L, Venegas R, Block J, et al. Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:491–7.PubMed Khalkhali I, Mena I, Jouanne E, Diggles L, Venegas R, Block J, et al. Prone scintimammography in patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:491–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Taillefer R. Clinical applications of 99 mTc-sestamibi scintimammography. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:100–15.PubMedCrossRef Taillefer R. Clinical applications of 99 mTc-sestamibi scintimammography. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:100–15.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Babuccu O, Peksoy I, Kargi E, Hoşnuter M, Ozdemir H, Gündoğdu S, et al. The value of scintimammography in reduction mammaplasties: a preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:296–300.PubMedCrossRef Babuccu O, Peksoy I, Kargi E, Hoşnuter M, Ozdemir H, Gündoğdu S, et al. The value of scintimammography in reduction mammaplasties: a preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:296–300.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Baum JK, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, Hanelin LG, Lugo CE, et al. (99 m)Tc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicenter study. Radiology. 2002;222:149–55.PubMedCrossRef Khalkhali I, Baum JK, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, Hanelin LG, Lugo CE, et al. (99 m)Tc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicenter study. Radiology. 2002;222:149–55.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lumachi F, Ferretti G, Povolato M, Marzola MC, Zucchetta P, Geatti O, et al. Accuracy of technetium-99 m sestamibi scintimammography and X-ray mammography in premenopausal women with suspected breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1776–80.PubMedCrossRef Lumachi F, Ferretti G, Povolato M, Marzola MC, Zucchetta P, Geatti O, et al. Accuracy of technetium-99 m sestamibi scintimammography and X-ray mammography in premenopausal women with suspected breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1776–80.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Arslan N, Oztürk E, Ilgan S, Urhan M, Karaçalioglu O, Pekcan M, et al. 99Tcm-MIBI scintimammography in the evaluation of breast lesions and axillary involvement: a comparison with mammography and histopathological diagnosis. Nucl Med Commun. 1999;20:317–25.PubMedCrossRef Arslan N, Oztürk E, Ilgan S, Urhan M, Karaçalioglu O, Pekcan M, et al. 99Tcm-MIBI scintimammography in the evaluation of breast lesions and axillary involvement: a comparison with mammography and histopathological diagnosis. Nucl Med Commun. 1999;20:317–25.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Palmedo H, Grünwald F, Bender H, Schomburg A, Mallmann P, Krebs D, et al. Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: comparison with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:940–6.PubMedCrossRef Palmedo H, Grünwald F, Bender H, Schomburg A, Mallmann P, Krebs D, et al. Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: comparison with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:940–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247:651–7.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247:651–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Kieper DA, Majewski S, Goodman S, Civelek C. High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:909–15.PubMed Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Kieper DA, Majewski S, Goodman S, Civelek C. High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:909–15.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Brem RF, Petrovitch I, Rapelyea JA, Young H, Teal C, Kelly T. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer—a comparative study. Breast J. 2007;13:465–9.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Petrovitch I, Rapelyea JA, Young H, Teal C, Kelly T. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer—a comparative study. Breast J. 2007;13:465–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–5. (discussion 445–7).PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–5. (discussion 445–7).PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004;292:2735–42.PubMedCrossRef Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004;292:2735–42.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapelyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:945–50.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapelyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:945–50.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254–63.PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254–63.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality in breast cancer patients with dense breast: a comparative study with MRI
Author
Bom Sahn Kim
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0544-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2/2012 Go to the issue