Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Nuclear Medicine

01-02-2010 | Original Article

Additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET alone in the initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Clinical application of FDG-PET in head and neck cancer includes identification of metastases, unknown primary head and neck malignancy, or second primary carcinoma, and also recurrent tumor after treatment. In this study, the additional value of PET/CT fusion images over PET images alone was evaluated in patients with initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy.

Methods

Forty patients with suspected primary head and neck malignancy and 129 patients with suspected relapse after treatment of head and neck malignancy were included. FDG-PET/CT study was performed after the intravenous administration of FDG (5 MBq/kg). Target of evaluation was set at primary tumor, cervical lymph node, and whole body. PET images and PET with CT fusion images were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results of PET and PET/CT were compared with postoperative histopathological examination, and case by case comparison of PET and PET/CT results for each region was performed. The additional value of CT images over PET only images was assessed. Statistical differences in sensitivity and specificity were evaluated.

Results

In the comparative evaluation of 507 targets by PET alone and PET/CT, 401 targets showed agreement of the results. Of the 106 discordant targets, 103 showed a positive result on PET alone and negative result on PET/CT. These results showed a significant difference (p < 0.01). Sensitivity of PET/CT was slightly higher than that of PET without statistical significance, while specificity of PET/CT was significantly higher than that of PET alone (Initial staging: 90.5% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.01; Follow up: 97.2% vs. 74.4%, p < 0.01). In Fisher’s direct probability test, a significant difference was noted in the sensitivity (Initial staging: 91.3% vs. 87.0%, p < 0.01; Follow up: 93.9% vs. 91.4%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Combined PET/CT showed improved diagnostic performance than PET alone by decreasing the number of false positive findings in patients with initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy.
Literature
1.
2.
Horiuchi M, Yasuda S, Shohtsu A, Ide M. Four cases of Warthin’s tumor of the parotid gland detected with FDG PET. Ann Nucl Med. 1998;12:47–50.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Subramaniam RM, Durnick DK, Peller PJ. F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging of submandibular gland oncocytoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:472–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Yao M, Smith RB, Hoffman HT, Funk GF, Lu M, Menda Y, et al. Clinical significance of postradiotherapy [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in management of head-and-neck cancer-A long-term outcome report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;74:9–14.PubMed
5.
Yen TC, Chang JT, Ng SH, Chang YC, Chan SC, Lin KJ, et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of stage M0 carcinoma of the nasopharynx. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:405–10.PubMed
6.
Goerres GW, Schmid DT, Grätz KW, von Schulthess GK, Eyrich GK. Impact of whole body positron emission tomography on initial staging and therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:547–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Tsubaki M, Sunagawa M, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:362–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1369–79.PubMed
9.
Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed
10.
Escott EJ. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography protocol considerations for head and neck cancer imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008;29:263–70.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bold B, Piao Y, Murata Y, Kishino M, Shibuya H. Usefulness of PET/CT for detecting a second primary cancer after treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:831–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Deantonio L, Beldì D, Gambaro G, Loi G, Brambilla M, Inglese E, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2008;3:29.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Roh JL, Kim JS, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Choi SH, Nam SY, et al. Utility of combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with cervical metastases from unknown primary tumors. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:218–24.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:712–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kato H, Kimura H, Nakajima M, Sakai M, Sano A, Tanaka N, et al. The additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET in initial lymph node staging of esophageal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:857–62.PubMed
16.
Yuan S, Yu Y, Chao KS, Fu Z, Yin Y, Liu T, et al. Additional value of PET/CT over PET in assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1255–9.PubMed
17.
Martin RC, Fulham M, Shannon KF, Hughes C, Gao K, Milross C, et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for mucosal head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2009;31:244–50.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM, Ng SH, Hsueh C, Lee LY, et al. Preoperative [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake value of neck lymph nodes predicts neck cancer control and survival rates in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and pathologically positive lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;74:1054–61.PubMed
19.
Suzuki H, Hasegawa Y, Terada A, Hyodo I, Nakashima T, Nishio M, et al. FDG-PET predicts survival and distant metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008;45:569–73.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Inohara H, Enomoto K, Tomiyama Y, Yoshii T, Osaki Y, Higuchi I, et al. The role of CT and 18F-FDG PET in managing the neck in node-positive head and neck cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:893–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET alone in the initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy
Publication date
01-02-2010
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-009-0326-5