Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Pediatrics 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

A Comparative Study on Reliability of Point of Care Sodium and Potassium Estimation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Authors: Viswas Chhapola, Sandeep Kumar Kanwal, Rajni Sharma, Virendra Kumar

Published in: Indian Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare sodium and potassium levels in children as done with Blood Gas Analyzer (BGA) at point of care testing in pediatric ICU vs. that done in laboratory electrolyte analyzer.

Methods

This prospective method comparison study was done from February to April 2012 in Pediatric ICU of tertiary care hospital at Delhi. Sixty consecutive patients were tested during the period. Paired blood samples for venous blood gas to be tested on BGA and serum electrolytes to be tested on auto-analyzers (AA) were taken as per standard technique. Data was collected and 59 paired samples were analyzed for sodium and potassium levels. They were analyzed according to CLSI document EP15-A2 using ACB method comparison software.

Results

Mean sodium measured on the BGA was 132.8 ± 12.2 mmol/L where as measured by AA was 141.5 ± 11.1 mmol/L. The mean difference between the two was −8.76 mmol/L (p < 0.001). The difference was statistically significant in all three subgroups of hypernatremia, isonatremia and hyponatremia (p < 0.001). Potassium level in BGA was 3.53 ± 0.81 mmol/L and AA was 4.28 ± 1.05 mmol/L. The mean difference between the BGA and AA was −0.75 mmol/L (p < 0.0001). The difference was statistically significant in patients with normokalemia and hyperkalemia (p < 0.0001). The difference was non significant in patients with hypokalemia (p = 0.051).

Conclusions

Blood gas analyzers underestimates Na + and K + values if sampling is done using liquid sodium heparin and if all other potential pre-analytical errors of testing are taken care of. The Bland Altman’s analysis in the present study showed a significant systematic bias and very wide limits of agreement for both sodium and potassium, which is not clinically acceptable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jain A, Subhan I, Joshi M. Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes. Int J Emerg Med. 2009;2:117–20.PubMedCrossRef Jain A, Subhan I, Joshi M. Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes. Int J Emerg Med. 2009;2:117–20.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Westgard JO. Charts of operational process specifications (“OPSpecs charts”) for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria. Clin Chem. 1992;38:1226–33.PubMed Westgard JO. Charts of operational process specifications (“OPSpecs charts”) for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria. Clin Chem. 1992;38:1226–33.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Morimatsu H, Rocktäschel J, Bellomo R, Uchino S, Goldsmith D, Gutteridge G. Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion difference. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1077–84.PubMedCrossRef Morimatsu H, Rocktäschel J, Bellomo R, Uchino S, Goldsmith D, Gutteridge G. Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion difference. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1077–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chacko B, Peter JV, Patole S, Fleming JJ, Selvakumar R. Electrolytes assessed by point-of-care testing - Are the values comparable with results obtained from the central laboratory? Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15:24–9.PubMedCrossRef Chacko B, Peter JV, Patole S, Fleming JJ, Selvakumar R. Electrolytes assessed by point-of-care testing - Are the values comparable with results obtained from the central laboratory? Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15:24–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Higgins C. The use of heparin in preparing samples for blood-gas analysis. MLO Med Lab Obs. 2007;39:16–8.PubMed Higgins C. The use of heparin in preparing samples for blood-gas analysis. MLO Med Lab Obs. 2007;39:16–8.PubMed
6.
7.
9.
go back to reference Arthurs O, Pattnayak S, Bewley B, Kelsall W. Clinical impact of point-of-care testing using the OMNI-S blood gas analyzer in a neonatal intensive care setting. Point of care. Near Patient Test Technol. 2010; doi:10.1097/POC.0b013e3181d2d6b0. Arthurs O, Pattnayak S, Bewley B, Kelsall W. Clinical impact of point-of-care testing using the OMNI-S blood gas analyzer in a neonatal intensive care setting. Point of care. Near Patient Test Technol. 2010; doi:10.​1097/​POC.​0b013e3181d2d6b0​.
10.
go back to reference Yip PM, Chan MK, Zielinski N, Adeli K. Heparin interference in whole blood sodium measurements in a pediatric setting. Clin Biochem. 2006;39:391–5.PubMedCrossRef Yip PM, Chan MK, Zielinski N, Adeli K. Heparin interference in whole blood sodium measurements in a pediatric setting. Clin Biochem. 2006;39:391–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8.PubMed Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Van BM, Scharnhorst V. Electrolyte-balanced heparin in blood gas syringes can introduce a significant bias in the measurement of positively charged electrolytes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:249–52. Van BM, Scharnhorst V. Electrolyte-balanced heparin in blood gas syringes can introduce a significant bias in the measurement of positively charged electrolytes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:249–52.
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Study on Reliability of Point of Care Sodium and Potassium Estimation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Authors
Viswas Chhapola
Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
Rajni Sharma
Virendra Kumar
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0019-5456
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7693
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-013-0977-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Indian Journal of Pediatrics 9/2013 Go to the issue

Symposium on Pediatric Oncology: Hemato-Oncology

Flow Cytometry in Hematological Disorders