Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Brief Research Article

Validation of the prognostic value of new sub-stages within the AJCC 8th edition of non-small cell lung cancer

Author: O. Abdel-Rahman

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been released. The current study tried to validate the prognostic significance of the new system among patients registered within the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database.

Methods

SEER database (2010–2013) has been accessed through SEER*Stat program and AJCC 8th edition stages were reconstructed utilizing the collaborative stage descriptions. Overall and lung cancer-specific survival analyses according to both 7th and 8th editions were conducted through Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate analysis was conducted through a Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

A total of 127,096 patients with NSCLC were identified in the period from 2010 to 2013. For overall survival assessment according to the 8th edition, P values for all pair-wise comparisons among different stages were significant (<0.0001) except for the comparisons between stage IB and IIA (P = 0.146); stage IIA and IIB (P = 0.165). For lung cancer-specific survival according to the 8th edition, P values for all pair-wise comparisons among different stages were significant (<0.001). Among patients with stage I disease, multivariate analysis for factors affecting overall and lung cancer-specific survival among patients with stage I disease was conducted. The following factors were associated with worse overall and lung cancer-specific survival: age ≥70 years, more advanced stage, male gender, squamous histology, no surgery and no radiotherapy (P < 0.0001 for all factors).

Conclusion

This SEER analysis supports the prognostic significance of the added sub-stages described within AJCC 8th edition stages I and III. Further work is needed to incorporate molecular markers and personalize the future editions of the AJCC staging system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Globocan.iarc.fr. Last Accessed on 27 Nov 2016. Globocan.iarc.fr. Last Accessed on 27 Nov 2016.
2.
go back to reference Paleiron N, Bylicki O, André M, Rivière E, Grassin F, Robinet G, et al. Targeted therapy for localized non-small-cell lung cancer: a review. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:4099–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paleiron N, Bylicki O, André M, Rivière E, Grassin F, Robinet G, et al. Targeted therapy for localized non-small-cell lung cancer: a review. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:4099–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Abdel-Rahman O, Elhalawani H. Risk of fatal pulmonary events in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a comparative meta-analysis. Futur Oncol. 2015;11(7):1109–22.CrossRef Abdel-Rahman O, Elhalawani H. Risk of fatal pulmonary events in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a comparative meta-analysis. Futur Oncol. 2015;11(7):1109–22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sen F, Tambas M, Ozkaya K, Guveli ME, Ciftci R, Ozkan B, et al. Concomitant etoposide and cisplatin provided improved survival compared with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Medicine. 2016;95(30):e4280.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sen F, Tambas M, Ozkaya K, Guveli ME, Ciftci R, Ozkan B, et al. Concomitant etoposide and cisplatin provided improved survival compared with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Medicine. 2016;95(30):e4280.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Aggarwal C. Targeted therapy for lung cancer: present and future. Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3(3):229–35.PubMed Aggarwal C. Targeted therapy for lung cancer: present and future. Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3(3):229–35.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bansal P, Rusthoven C, Boumber Y, Gan GN. The role of local ablative therapy in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: hype or hope. Futur Oncol. 2016;12(23):2713–27.CrossRef Bansal P, Rusthoven C, Boumber Y, Gan GN. The role of local ablative therapy in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: hype or hope. Futur Oncol. 2016;12(23):2713–27.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Sobin LH, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):694–705.CrossRefPubMed Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Sobin LH, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):694–705.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(1):39–51.CrossRefPubMed Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(1):39–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ou SH, Zell JA. Validation study of the proposed IASLC staging revisions of the T4 and M non-small cell lung cancer descriptors using data from 23,583 patients in the California cancer registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(3):216–27.CrossRefPubMed Ou SH, Zell JA. Validation study of the proposed IASLC staging revisions of the T4 and M non-small cell lung cancer descriptors using data from 23,583 patients in the California cancer registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(3):216–27.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zell JA, Ignatius Ou SH, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Validation of the proposed International Association for the Study of lung cancer non-small cell lung cancer staging system revisions for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma using data from the California Cancer Registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(12):1078–85.CrossRefPubMed Zell JA, Ignatius Ou SH, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Validation of the proposed International Association for the Study of lung cancer non-small cell lung cancer staging system revisions for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma using data from the California Cancer Registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(12):1078–85.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zhang J, Gold KA, Lin HY, Swisher SG, Xing Y, Lee JJ, et al. Relationship between tumor size and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(4):682–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, Gold KA, Lin HY, Swisher SG, Xing Y, Lee JJ, et al. Relationship between tumor size and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(4):682–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Morgensztern D, Waqar S, Subramanian J, Gao F, Trinkaus K, Govindan R. Prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) survey from 1998 to 2003. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(10):1479–84.CrossRefPubMed Morgensztern D, Waqar S, Subramanian J, Gao F, Trinkaus K, Govindan R. Prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) survey from 1998 to 2003. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(10):1479–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ren Y, Dai C, Zheng H, Zhou F, She Y, Jiang G, et al. Prognostic effect of liver metastasis in lung cancer patients with distant metastasis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(33):53245–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ren Y, Dai C, Zheng H, Zhou F, She Y, Jiang G, et al. Prognostic effect of liver metastasis in lung cancer patients with distant metastasis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(33):53245–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Validation of the prognostic value of new sub-stages within the AJCC 8th edition of non-small cell lung cancer
Author
O. Abdel-Rahman
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1673-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Clinical and Translational Oncology 11/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine