Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Review Article

Targeted cancer therapy: interactions with other medicines

Author: D. Conde-Estévez

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Targeted therapy drugs, mainly those within the signal transduction inhibitors, are used more chronically than cytotoxic drugs and are metabolised by cytochrome P450 isozymes so patients are at high risk of having drug–drug interactions (DDI). Not only this, as the majority of them are given orally, new drug–drug interactions concerning gastrointestinal absorption can occur (e.g., with proton pump inhibitors). DDI can lead to changed systemic exposure, resulting in variations in drug response of the co-administered. In addition, concomitant ingestion of dietary supplements could also alter systemic exposure of drugs, thus leading to adverse drug reactions or loss of efficacy. In this review, we give an overview of the current existing data of known or suspected DDI between targeted therapy and other medicines. A review of package inserts was performed to identify drug–drug interactions for all targeted antineoplastic agents. Tertiary databases such as Lexicomp®, Drugs, Martindale, Facts and Comparisons®, and AHFS Drug Information were also referenced. This study covered 40 targeted antineoplastic agents (28 signal transduction inhibitors, 9 monoclonal antibodies and 3 other drugs, 2 monoclonal antibody conjugates and 1 fusion protein). Most of targeted therapy drugs are major CYP3A4 substrates with P-gp playing an important role in disposition too. Thus, there is a very common thread here that these agents will likely be sensitive victims to strong CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors and inducers. It is essential that health care providers monitor patients for potential DDI to avoid a loss in efficacy or risk of greater toxicity from targeted therapy.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:172–87.CrossRefPubMed Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:172–87.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Verweij J. Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:272–81.CrossRefPubMed Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Verweij J. Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:272–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van Leeuwen RW, Brundel DH, Neef C, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RH, Burger DM, et al. Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1071–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Leeuwen RW, Brundel DH, Neef C, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RH, Burger DM, et al. Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1071–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L, Saad ED, Taback NA, Krzyzanowska MK. Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:592–600.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L, Saad ED, Taback NA, Krzyzanowska MK. Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:592–600.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Stadler WM. New targets, therapies, and toxicities: lessons to be learned. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4–5.CrossRefPubMed Stadler WM. New targets, therapies, and toxicities: lessons to be learned. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Conde-Estévez D, Echeverría-Esnal D, Tusquets I, Albanell J. Potential clinical relevant drug-drug interactions: comparison between different compendia, do we have a validated method? Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1272.CrossRefPubMed Conde-Estévez D, Echeverría-Esnal D, Tusquets I, Albanell J. Potential clinical relevant drug-drug interactions: comparison between different compendia, do we have a validated method? Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1272.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van Leeuwen RW, Mathijssen RH, Jansman FG, van Gelder T, et al. Reply to the letter to the editor ‘potential clinical relevant drug-drug interactions: comparison between different compendia, do we have a validated method’ by Conde-Estévez et al. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1272–3.CrossRefPubMed van Leeuwen RW, Mathijssen RH, Jansman FG, van Gelder T, et al. Reply to the letter to the editor ‘potential clinical relevant drug-drug interactions: comparison between different compendia, do we have a validated method’ by Conde-Estévez et al. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1272–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Huang SM, Strong JM, Zhang L, Reynolds KS, Nallani S, Temple R, et al. New era in drug interaction evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration update on CYP enzymes, transporters, and the guidance process. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;48:662–70.CrossRefPubMed Huang SM, Strong JM, Zhang L, Reynolds KS, Nallani S, Temple R, et al. New era in drug interaction evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration update on CYP enzymes, transporters, and the guidance process. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;48:662–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ter Heine R, Fanggiday JC, Lankheet NA, Beijnen JH, Van Der Westerlaken MM, Staaks GH, et al. Erlotinib and pantoprazole: a relevant interaction or not? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70:908–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ter Heine R, Fanggiday JC, Lankheet NA, Beijnen JH, Van Der Westerlaken MM, Staaks GH, et al. Erlotinib and pantoprazole: a relevant interaction or not? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70:908–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hilton JF, Tu D, Seymour L, Shepherd FA, Bradbury PA. An evaluation of the possible interaction of gastric acid suppressing medication and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:136–42.CrossRefPubMed Hilton JF, Tu D, Seymour L, Shepherd FA, Bradbury PA. An evaluation of the possible interaction of gastric acid suppressing medication and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:136–42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fukudo M, Ikemi Y, Togashi Y, Masago K, Kim YH, Mio T, et al. Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of erlotinib and pharmacogenomic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52:593–609.CrossRefPubMed Fukudo M, Ikemi Y, Togashi Y, Masago K, Kim YH, Mio T, et al. Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of erlotinib and pharmacogenomic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52:593–609.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS, Abt M, Hamilton M, Lum BL. Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26:565–72.CrossRefPubMed Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS, Abt M, Hamilton M, Lum BL. Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26:565–72.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tsai HH, Lin HW, Simon Pickard A, Tsai HY, Mahady GB. Evaluation of documented drug interactions and contraindications associated with herbs and dietary supplements: a systematic literature review. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:1056–78.CrossRefPubMed Tsai HH, Lin HW, Simon Pickard A, Tsai HY, Mahady GB. Evaluation of documented drug interactions and contraindications associated with herbs and dietary supplements: a systematic literature review. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:1056–78.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Scheife RT, Hines LE, Boyce RD, Chung SP, Momper JD, Sommer CD, et al. Consensus recommendations for systematic evaluation of drug-drug interaction evidence for clinical decision support. Drug Saf. 2015;38:197–206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scheife RT, Hines LE, Boyce RD, Chung SP, Momper JD, Sommer CD, et al. Consensus recommendations for systematic evaluation of drug-drug interaction evidence for clinical decision support. Drug Saf. 2015;38:197–206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference van Leeuwen RW, Jansman FG, van den Bemt PM, de Man F, Piran F, Vincenten I, et al. Drug-drug interactions in patients treated for cancer: a prospective study on clinical interventions. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:992–7.CrossRefPubMed van Leeuwen RW, Jansman FG, van den Bemt PM, de Man F, Piran F, Vincenten I, et al. Drug-drug interactions in patients treated for cancer: a prospective study on clinical interventions. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:992–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Carcelero E, Anglada H, Tuset M, Creus N. Interactions between oral antineoplastic agents and concomitant medication: a systematic review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013;12:403–20.CrossRefPubMed Carcelero E, Anglada H, Tuset M, Creus N. Interactions between oral antineoplastic agents and concomitant medication: a systematic review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013;12:403–20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wong CM, Ko Y, Chan A. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: profiling and comparison of two drug compendia. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1737–48.CrossRefPubMed Wong CM, Ko Y, Chan A. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: profiling and comparison of two drug compendia. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1737–48.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Targeted cancer therapy: interactions with other medicines
Author
D. Conde-Estévez
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1509-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Clinical and Translational Oncology 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine