Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Research Article

Concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Authors: Z. Li, W. Mao, N. Lin, S. Han

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the present study, we compared the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin (CRSC) versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone (CRC) for the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC).

Methods

Between February 2006 and January 2009, 72 eligible patients with ACC were included and randomly divided into two groups. Thirty-six patients received CRSC with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks) beginning on day 1, S-1 (according to body surface area) for 28 days repeated every 6 weeks, and cisplatin (50 mg/m2, intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks for two cycles. The other 36 received CRC at the same cisplatin and radiotherapy dosage as for CRSC. The primary outcome was overall survival, whereas the secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and toxicity.

Results

The median overall survival was 75 months (range 4–86 months) for the CRSC group and 66 months (range 3–87 months) for the CRC group (P = 0.039). The median corresponding progression-free survival was 66 months (range 3–75 months) and 58 months (range 3–71 months), respectively (P = 0.042). The toxicity profile was similar in both the groups.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that CRSC might be more effective than CRC in patients with ACC with acceptable toxicity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirwan JM, Symonds P, Green JA, Tierney J, Collingwood M, Williams CJ. A systematic review of acute and late toxicity of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2003;68:217–26.CrossRefPubMed Kirwan JM, Symonds P, Green JA, Tierney J, Collingwood M, Williams CJ. A systematic review of acute and late toxicity of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2003;68:217–26.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Maduro JH, Pras E, Willemse PH, de Vries EG. Acute and long-term toxicity following radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29:471–88.CrossRefPubMed Maduro JH, Pras E, Willemse PH, de Vries EG. Acute and long-term toxicity following radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29:471–88.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference National Cancer Institutes. Guidelines gynaecologic tumours: cervical carcinoma [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institutes; 2004 [cited 2011 Jun 20]. http://www.cancer.gov. National Cancer Institutes. Guidelines gynaecologic tumours: cervical carcinoma [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institutes; 2004 [cited 2011 Jun 20]. http://​www.​cancer.​gov.
4.
go back to reference King M, McConkey C, Latief TN, Hartley A, Fernando I. Improved survival after concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma with assessment of acute and late side-effects. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18:38–45.CrossRef King M, McConkey C, Latief TN, Hartley A, Fernando I. Improved survival after concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma with assessment of acute and late side-effects. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18:38–45.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Thomas GM. Improved treatment for cervical cancer: concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1198–200.CrossRefPubMed Thomas GM. Improved treatment for cervical cancer: concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1198–200.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, Yamaguchi M, Kato T, Yonekura K, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.CrossRefPubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, Yamaguchi M, Kato T, Yonekura K, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yunokawa M, Katsumata N, Yamamoto H, Kodaira M, Yonemori K, Shimizu C, et al. A pilot feasibility study for cisplatin plus S-1 for the treatment for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(5):1369–74.CrossRefPubMed Yunokawa M, Katsumata N, Yamamoto H, Kodaira M, Yonemori K, Shimizu C, et al. A pilot feasibility study for cisplatin plus S-1 for the treatment for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(5):1369–74.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Katsumata N, Hirai Y, Kamiura S, Sugiyama T, Kokawa K, Hatae M, et al. Phase II study of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1353–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katsumata N, Hirai Y, Kamiura S, Sugiyama T, Kokawa K, Hatae M, et al. Phase II study of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1353–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Liu H, Chen X, Sun J, Gao P, Song Y, Zhang N, et al. The efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel plus S-1 compared with paclitaxel plus 5-FU for advanced gastric cancer: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(25):e164.CrossRef Liu H, Chen X, Sun J, Gao P, Song Y, Zhang N, et al. The efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel plus S-1 compared with paclitaxel plus 5-FU for advanced gastric cancer: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(25):e164.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Okuno T, Shirotsuki J, Murahashi K, Sawada T. Advanced gastric cancer (stage IV) leading to perforation during chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41(10):1313–5.PubMed Okuno T, Shirotsuki J, Murahashi K, Sawada T. Advanced gastric cancer (stage IV) leading to perforation during chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41(10):1313–5.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ye J, Chen J, Ge L, Liu A, Zhou S. Effectiveness and safety of S-1-based therapy compared with 5-fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:146530.PubMedPubMedCentral Ye J, Chen J, Ge L, Liu A, Zhou S. Effectiveness and safety of S-1-based therapy compared with 5-fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:146530.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Yoshida N, Baba H. Efficacy of S-1 in colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(12):1761–70.CrossRefPubMed Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Yoshida N, Baba H. Efficacy of S-1 in colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(12):1761–70.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fujimoto Y, Kato S, Itoh Y, Naganawa S, Nakashima T. A phase I study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using oral S-1 for head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(1):209–13.PubMed Fujimoto Y, Kato S, Itoh Y, Naganawa S, Nakashima T. A phase I study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using oral S-1 for head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(1):209–13.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hayashi H, Okamoto I, Ueda S, Tanaka K, Okamoto K, Kawakami H, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 granules and nedaplatin for advanced head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013;33(12):5699–705.PubMed Hayashi H, Okamoto I, Ueda S, Tanaka K, Okamoto K, Kawakami H, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 granules and nedaplatin for advanced head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013;33(12):5699–705.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kawahara M. Efficacy of S-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(13):1927–42.CrossRefPubMed Kawahara M. Efficacy of S-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(13):1927–42.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Aoe K, Takigawa N, Hotta K, Maeda T, Kishino D, Nogami N, et al. A phase II study of S-1 chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0801. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(16):2783–90.CrossRefPubMed Aoe K, Takigawa N, Hotta K, Maeda T, Kishino D, Nogami N, et al. A phase II study of S-1 chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0801. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(16):2783–90.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Moon YW, Lee S, Park BW, Kim EK, Kim SI, Koo JS, et al. S-1 combined with docetaxel following doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:583.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon YW, Lee S, Park BW, Kim EK, Kim SI, Koo JS, et al. S-1 combined with docetaxel following doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:583.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Nishimura R, Tanigawa T, Kawano I, Hayashi K, Kuramoto M, et al. Efficacy and safety of TS-1 monotherapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer—an observational study by the Kumamoto Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (KBCCG). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41(10):1221–5.PubMed Yamamoto Y, Nishimura R, Tanigawa T, Kawano I, Hayashi K, Kuramoto M, et al. Efficacy and safety of TS-1 monotherapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer—an observational study by the Kumamoto Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (KBCCG). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41(10):1221–5.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Song H, Han B, Park CK, Kim JH, Jeon JY, Kim IG, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine and S-1 for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(4):845–52.CrossRefPubMed Song H, Han B, Park CK, Kim JH, Jeon JY, Kim IG, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine and S-1 for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(4):845–52.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Yamaue H, Satoi S, Kanbe T, Miyazawa M, Tani M, Kawai M, et al. Phase II clinical study of alternate-day oral therapy with S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(1):97–102.CrossRefPubMed Yamaue H, Satoi S, Kanbe T, Miyazawa M, Tani M, Kawai M, et al. Phase II clinical study of alternate-day oral therapy with S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(1):97–102.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, Takashima A, Ueno M, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1211–6.CrossRefPubMed Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, Takashima A, Ueno M, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1211–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Suzuki E, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, Nakamori S, Ohkawa S, Nagakawa T, et al. A multicenter phase II study of S-1 for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(5):1141–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suzuki E, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, Nakamori S, Ohkawa S, Nagakawa T, et al. A multicenter phase II study of S-1 for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(5):1141–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin versus concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Authors
Z. Li
W. Mao
N. Lin
S. Han
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1385-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Clinical and Translational Oncology 4/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine