Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Using Neural Response Threshold (NRT) and Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA)

Authors: Ashvanee kumar Chaudhary, Vishwambhar Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Ashutosh Alakh Avinashi, Sunil Kumar

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

To measure the correlation between neural response threshold (NRT) and most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) whichever is better for rehabilitation purpose and to calculate the impedance of the electrode in cochlear implant recipient. Mapping may be done by various methods here we did by NRT and behavioral observation audiometry (BOA). NRT is technique by which we measure the response from the auditory nerve using the hi-resolution bionic ear system. Neural response measurement depends on the-neural tissue, stimulus used and recording technique. BOA is used for observing motor response on presenting sound to the implanted child. Most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) is calculated for behavioural response. It measures the useful information about low frequency hearing, it provides more information about the hearing of neurologically immature babies giving indication of uncomfortable loudness levels. The NRT and MCLB is calculated for 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode for all patients in our study. Auditory response threshold is better for rehabilitations then behavioural observation audiometry for Cochlear implant patients. Mean value and standard deviation of neural response threshold (NRT) (qu) are 10.23, 3.67; 11.27, 4.39; 10.71, 3.88 at 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode respectively. Mean value and standard deviation of Most comfortable level for behavioral response (qu) are 20.49, 7.08; 21.26, 7.31; 21.01, 6.03 at 2nd, 6th and 11th electrode respectively. NRT is better for post-operative rehabilitations and MCL and threshold vary with different electrode and in different patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Soli SD, Zheng Y (2010) Long-term reliability of pediatric cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 31(6):899–901CrossRefPubMed Soli SD, Zheng Y (2010) Long-term reliability of pediatric cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 31(6):899–901CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mittal R, Panwar SS, Nair S, Sinha VR, Ramesh AV, Nilkanthan A, Raj P (2015) Mapping of pediatric cochlear implant recipients using electrical auditory brainstem responses as a tool. Int Otol 21:14–18CrossRef Mittal R, Panwar SS, Nair S, Sinha VR, Ramesh AV, Nilkanthan A, Raj P (2015) Mapping of pediatric cochlear implant recipients using electrical auditory brainstem responses as a tool. Int Otol 21:14–18CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Driver S, Jiang D (2017) Paediatric cochlear implantation factors that affect outcomes. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 21:104–108CrossRefPubMed Driver S, Jiang D (2017) Paediatric cochlear implantation factors that affect outcomes. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 21:104–108CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim L-S, Jeong S-W, Lee Y-M, Kim J-S (2009) Cochlear implantation in children. Auris Nasus Larynx 37(1):6–17CrossRefPubMed Kim L-S, Jeong S-W, Lee Y-M, Kim J-S (2009) Cochlear implantation in children. Auris Nasus Larynx 37(1):6–17CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Telmesani LM, Said NM (2016) Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 82:28–33CrossRefPubMed Telmesani LM, Said NM (2016) Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 82:28–33CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koch DB, Overstreet EH (2003) Neural response imaging: measuring auditory-nerve responses from the cochlea with the hi-resolution bionic ear system. Advanced Bionics Corporation, Bengaluru Koch DB, Overstreet EH (2003) Neural response imaging: measuring auditory-nerve responses from the cochlea with the hi-resolution bionic ear system. Advanced Bionics Corporation, Bengaluru
8.
go back to reference Clinical applications of nucleus NRT (2011) Neural Response Telemetry. Cochlear, Australia Clinical applications of nucleus NRT (2011) Neural Response Telemetry. Cochlear, Australia
9.
go back to reference Kasim KS, Abdullah AB, Hashim WF (2013) Correlation between neural response telemetry (NRT) measurement level and behavioral (T-level and C-level) in prelingual cochlear implant patients. J Atolarynol 3:3 Kasim KS, Abdullah AB, Hashim WF (2013) Correlation between neural response telemetry (NRT) measurement level and behavioral (T-level and C-level) in prelingual cochlear implant patients. J Atolarynol 3:3
Metadata
Title
Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Using Neural Response Threshold (NRT) and Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA)
Authors
Ashvanee kumar Chaudhary
Vishwambhar Singh
Rajesh Kumar
Ashutosh Alakh Avinashi
Sunil Kumar
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1524-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue