Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

Hearing Improvement in Interposition Ossiculoplasty and Myringostapediopexy

Authors: Shashank Chaudhary, K. C. Prasad

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Chronic otitis media (COM) may lead to partial or complete loss of tympanic membrane and erosion of the ossicles. Ossicular chain reconstruction may be done by interposition ossiculoplasty or myringostapediopexy. The aim of our study was to determine the hearing outcome in interposition ossiculoplasty and myringostapediopexy using autologous incus or cortical bone graft in intact canal wall tympanoplasty. 64 patients with COM, who underwent interposition ossiculoplasty or myringostapediopexy were included in the study. Audiometric evaluation was done after 3 months after surgery and all patients were followed up for a period of 1 year. The hearing results were compared in terms of mean pre-op and post-op Air conduction thresholds, Air-Bone gap (ABG) and hearing gain or ABG closure. In this study the mean ABG closure for interposition ossiculoplasty and myringostapediopexy was 15.4 dB and 21.8 dB, respectively. Hearing gain with cortical bone graft was higher than hearing gains with incus in both the groups, but not statistically significant. Myringostapediopexy provides marginally better hearing gain compared to interposition ossiculoplasty. Aulogous incus, and cortical bone graft are suitable autologous materials for ossicular reconstruction and provide similar hearing outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naragund AI, Mudhol RS, Harugop AS, Patil PH (2011) Ossiculoplasty with autologus incus versus titanium prosthesis: a comparison of anatomical and functional results. Indian J Otol 17:75–79CrossRef Naragund AI, Mudhol RS, Harugop AS, Patil PH (2011) Ossiculoplasty with autologus incus versus titanium prosthesis: a comparison of anatomical and functional results. Indian J Otol 17:75–79CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Austin DF (1972) Ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 5:145–160PubMed Austin DF (1972) Ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 5:145–160PubMed
3.
go back to reference Committee on hearing and equilibrium (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for evaluations of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187CrossRef Committee on hearing and equilibrium (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for evaluations of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adhikari B, A Ghosh, Pal S, Haque F (2016) Clinico-audiological comparison between classical type-III tympanoplasty and ossiculoplasty using autograft ossicles in patients with Austin type A defects. Int J Contemp Med Res 3:2422–2425 Adhikari B, A Ghosh, Pal S, Haque F (2016) Clinico-audiological comparison between classical type-III tympanoplasty and ossiculoplasty using autograft ossicles in patients with Austin type A defects. Int J Contemp Med Res 3:2422–2425
5.
go back to reference Corso ED, Marshese MR, Sergi B, Rigante M, Paludetti G (2007) Role of ossiculolasty in canal wall down tympanoplasty for middle-ear cholesteatoma: hearing results. J Laryngol Otol 121:324–328CrossRef Corso ED, Marshese MR, Sergi B, Rigante M, Paludetti G (2007) Role of ossiculolasty in canal wall down tympanoplasty for middle-ear cholesteatoma: hearing results. J Laryngol Otol 121:324–328CrossRef
6.
go back to reference O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP (2005) Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 26:853–858CrossRef O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP (2005) Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 26:853–858CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Iurato S, Marioni G, Onofri M (2001) Hearing results of ossiculoplasty in Austin-Kartush group A patients. Otol Neurotol 22:140–144CrossRef Iurato S, Marioni G, Onofri M (2001) Hearing results of ossiculoplasty in Austin-Kartush group A patients. Otol Neurotol 22:140–144CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Quaranta N, Feijoo SF, Piazza F, Zini C (2001) Closed tympanoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: long term (10 years) hearing results using cartilage ossiculoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:20–24CrossRef Quaranta N, Feijoo SF, Piazza F, Zini C (2001) Closed tympanoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: long term (10 years) hearing results using cartilage ossiculoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:20–24CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cook JA (1996) Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:379–383CrossRef Cook JA (1996) Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:379–383CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berenholz LP, Rizer FM, Burkey JM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH (2000) Ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:30–33CrossRef Berenholz LP, Rizer FM, Burkey JM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH (2000) Ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:30–33CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Singh VP, Sharma N, Bansal C (2017) Comparison of myringostapediopexy and malleostapediopexy tympanoplasty with sculptured incus in case of hearing reconstructuin in tubotympanic chronic otitis media: a case series. Indian J Otol 23:189–192CrossRef Singh VP, Sharma N, Bansal C (2017) Comparison of myringostapediopexy and malleostapediopexy tympanoplasty with sculptured incus in case of hearing reconstructuin in tubotympanic chronic otitis media: a case series. Indian J Otol 23:189–192CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mudhol RS, Naragund AI, Shruti VS (2013) Ossiculoplsty: revisited. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:451–454CrossRef Mudhol RS, Naragund AI, Shruti VS (2013) Ossiculoplsty: revisited. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:451–454CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ojala K, Sorri M, Vainio-Mattila J, Sipila P (1983) Late results of tympanoplasty using ossicle or cortical bone. J Laryngol Otol 97:19–25CrossRef Ojala K, Sorri M, Vainio-Mattila J, Sipila P (1983) Late results of tympanoplasty using ossicle or cortical bone. J Laryngol Otol 97:19–25CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mills RP (1993) The use of cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 107:686–689CrossRef Mills RP (1993) The use of cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 107:686–689CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Romanet P, Duvillard C, Delouane M (2000) Mastoid cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 117:105–109PubMed Romanet P, Duvillard C, Delouane M (2000) Mastoid cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 117:105–109PubMed
Metadata
Title
Hearing Improvement in Interposition Ossiculoplasty and Myringostapediopexy
Authors
Shashank Chaudhary
K. C. Prasad
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1478-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue