Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Early Speech Perception Test Outcome in Children with Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Unilateral Cochlear Implants Alone versus Bimodal Stimulation

Authors: Ajith Nilakantan, Poonam Raj, Sachin Saini, Ruchika Mittal

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Bilateral stimulation of the auditory system has clear advantages over unilateral hearing. Hearing-impaired children are, therefore, generally fitted with hearing aids in both ears so that they can have the benefits of binaural hearing. Children who use acochlear implant in one ear and no acoustic stimulation in the opposite ear are at a definite disadvantage. This study was undertaken to determine the advantages of bimodal stimulation in pediatric population especially in terms of speech recognition. This study comprised of 30 children between 3 and 6 years of age with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with cochlear implant in one ear and fitted with digital hearing aid in non-implanted ear. Speech recognition performance was compared in unilateral cochlear implant only and with bimodal hearing stimulation in the same set of children. A statistically significant difference was found between speech reception scores in children with a unilateral cochlear implant only and those with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the non implanted ear in quiet surroundings. It is suggested that the use of bimodal fitting be considered as an effective management method to obtain the advantage of binaural hearing in children who undergo unilateral cochlear implantation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Hill M, Dillon H (2005) Binaural redundancy and interaural difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44(9):513–521CrossRefPubMed Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Hill M, Dillon H (2005) Binaural redundancy and interaural difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44(9):513–521CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Johnstone PM, Nabelek AK, Robertson VS (2010) Sound localization acuity in children with unilateral hearing loss who wear a hearing aid in the impaired ear. J Am Acad Audiol 21(8):522–534CrossRefPubMed Johnstone PM, Nabelek AK, Robertson VS (2010) Sound localization acuity in children with unilateral hearing loss who wear a hearing aid in the impaired ear. J Am Acad Audiol 21(8):522–534CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Tao X, Jian-hua Q, W Li, Q Li, Lu L-J, Chen Y et al (2009) Bilateral cochlear implantation: advantages and disadvantages. Otol Neurotol 30:690–696CrossRef Tao X, Jian-hua Q, W Li, Q Li, Lu L-J, Chen Y et al (2009) Bilateral cochlear implantation: advantages and disadvantages. Otol Neurotol 30:690–696CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M (2004) Binaural benefits for adults who uses hearing aid and cochlear implants in opposite ear. Ear Hear 25(1):9–21CrossRefPubMed Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M (2004) Binaural benefits for adults who uses hearing aid and cochlear implants in opposite ear. Ear Hear 25(1):9–21CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr (2005) Cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months. Pediatrics 116(4):e487–e493CrossRefPubMed Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr (2005) Cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months. Pediatrics 116(4):e487–e493CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, Martinez A, Cokely C et al (2006) Speech recognition at 1-year follow-up in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study: methods and preliminary findings. Audiol Neurotol 11:259–268CrossRef Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, Martinez A, Cokely C et al (2006) Speech recognition at 1-year follow-up in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study: methods and preliminary findings. Audiol Neurotol 11:259–268CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bhat R, Tiwary V (2011) Early Speech Perception Test in Hindi, a procedure of administration and scoring. Dr SR Chandrashekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bangalore Bhat R, Tiwary V (2011) Early Speech Perception Test in Hindi, a procedure of administration and scoring. Dr SR Chandrashekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bangalore
10.
go back to reference Rathna Kumar SB, Mohanty P, Prakash SG (2010) Speech recognition performance in children with cochlear implants using bimodal stimulation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 62(4):342–345CrossRefPubMed Rathna Kumar SB, Mohanty P, Prakash SG (2010) Speech recognition performance in children with cochlear implants using bimodal stimulation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 62(4):342–345CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W (2002) Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 23(2):98–105CrossRefPubMed Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W (2002) Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 23(2):98–105CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Luntz M, Yehudai N, Shpak T (2007) Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal_binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid). Acta Otolaryngol 127(10):1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Luntz M, Yehudai N, Shpak T (2007) Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal_binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid). Acta Otolaryngol 127(10):1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Potts LG, Skinner MW, Littovsky RA, Strube MJ, Kuk F (2009) Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol 20(6):353–373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potts LG, Skinner MW, Littovsky RA, Strube MJ, Kuk F (2009) Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol 20(6):353–373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hamzavi J, Pok SM, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W (2004) Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 43(2):61–65CrossRefPubMed Hamzavi J, Pok SM, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W (2004) Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 43(2):61–65CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ching TY, Hill M, Brew J, Incerti P, Priolo S, Rushbrook E et al (2005) The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44(12):677–690CrossRefPubMed Ching TY, Hill M, Brew J, Incerti P, Priolo S, Rushbrook E et al (2005) The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44(12):677–690CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Phanindra R, Prakash SGR, Balaganesan K, Shusma S (2010) Speech identification scores in children with bimodal hearing. Lang India 10:28–36 Phanindra R, Prakash SGR, Balaganesan K, Shusma S (2010) Speech identification scores in children with bimodal hearing. Lang India 10:28–36
Metadata
Title
Early Speech Perception Test Outcome in Children with Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Unilateral Cochlear Implants Alone versus Bimodal Stimulation
Authors
Ajith Nilakantan
Poonam Raj
Sachin Saini
Ruchika Mittal
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1398-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue