Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Neurocritical Care
Published in: Neurocritical Care 1/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients Meeting Palliative Care Consultation Triggers in Neurological Intensive Care Units

Authors: Claire J. Creutzfeldt, Hannah Wunsch, J. Randall Curtis, May Hua

Published in: Neurocritical Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Palliative care needs among patients in the neurological intensive care unit (neuroICU) are poorly characterized. Our aim was to explore the prevalence and type of potential palliative care consultation triggers in neuroICUs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neuroICU admissions in Project IMPACT from 2001 to 2008. We assessed the prevalence of neuroICU admissions meeting one or more of five validated palliative care consultation triggers and compared the percentage of admissions meeting these triggers in other ICUs from the same hospitals.

Results

Among 1268 admissions to 2 neuroICUs, 200 (15.8 %) met one or more triggers for palliative care consultation. Among 13,694 admissions to non-neuroICUs in the same hospitals, 1909 (13.9 %) met one or more palliative care triggers (p = 0.44). The most common trigger in the neuroICU was intracerebral hemorrhage with mechanical ventilation (n = 92; 7.3 %). The most common trigger in non-neuroICUs was ICU admission following ≥10-day hospital stay (n = 805; 5.9 %). Although ICU mortality was not significantly higher in neuroICU vs. non-neuroICU patients meeting triggers (23.4 vs 19.9 %, p = 0.46), neuroICU patients were significantly more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (19.4 vs 8.0 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Among neuroICU patients, 15.8 % met triggers for palliative care consultation. Although prevalence of admissions meeting any trigger was similar amongst all ICUs, neuroICU admissions met different types of triggers and were more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. These data suggest that palliative care needs are common among neuroICU patients and discussions with patients and families regarding limitation of life-sustaining therapy may differ in this setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Lanken PN, Terry PB, Delisser HM, et al. An official american thoracic society clinical policy statement: palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases and critical illnesses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912–27.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C, et al. Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the icu: a report from the improving palliative care in the icu (ipal-icu) advisory board. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2318–27.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across united states intensive care units using a trigger-based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:428–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Holloway RG, Ladwig S, Robb J, Kelly A, Nielsen E, Quill TE. Palliative care consultations in hospitalized stroke patients. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:407–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
Kross EK, Engelberg RA, Downey L, et al. Differences in end-of-life care in the icu across patients cared for by medicine, surgery, neurology, and neurosurgery physicians. Chest. 2014;145:313–21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Project ICIC, Cook SF, Visscher WA, Hobbs CL, Williams RL. Project impact: results from a pilot validity study of a new observational database. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2765–70.CrossRef
7.
Norton SA, Hogan LA, Holloway RG, Temkin-Greener H, Buckley MJ, Quill TE. Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1530–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Dallara A, Tolchin DW. Emerging subspecialties in neurology: palliative care. Neurology. 2014;82:640–2.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Borasio GD. The role of palliative care in patients with neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:292–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Geurts M, Macleod MR, van Thiel GJ, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB. End-of-life decisions in patients with severe acute brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:515–24.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2014;45:1887–916.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H. Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1792–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56:766–72.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Creutzfeldt CJ, Becker KJ, Weinstein JR, et al. Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders and prognostic models for intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:158–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Creutzfeldt CJ, Holloway RG. Treatment decisions after severe stroke: uncertainty and biases. Stroke. 2012;43:3405–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Verkade MA, Epker JL, Nieuwenhoff MD, Bakker J, Kompanje EJ. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a mixed intensive care unit: most common in patients with catastropic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:130–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care–creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1173–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Nelson JE, Bassett R, Boss RD, et al. Models for structuring a clinical initiative to enhance palliative care in the intensive care unit: a report from the ipal-icu project (improving palliative care in the icu). Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1765–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients Meeting Palliative Care Consultation Triggers in Neurological Intensive Care Units
Authors
Claire J. Creutzfeldt
Hannah Wunsch
J. Randall Curtis
May Hua
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0143-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Neurocritical Care 1/2015 Go to the issue

Translational Research

Hypothermia Reduces but Hyperthermia Augments T Cell-Derived Release of Interleukin-17 and Granzyme B that Mediate Neuronal Cell Death

Practical Pearl

Hemorrhage or Ischemia? The Importance of ‘Spotting’ it Right

Letter to the Editor

Comments on the Risk Stratification for the In-Hospital Mortality in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The HAIR Score

Original Article

Changes in Cerebral Partial Oxygen Pressure and Cerebrovascular Reactivity During Intracranial Pressure Plateau Waves

Original Article

Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Stroke: A Multi-state Population-Based Study

Original Article

Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Delayed Shunting for Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage