Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Is Demirjian’s original method really useful for age estimation in a forensic context?

Authors: José Luís Carneiro, Inês Morais Caldas, Américo Afonso, Hugo Filipe Violante Cardoso

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The suitability of Demirjian’s method for forensic age estimation has been systematically questioned. The aim of this study is to further assess the reliability of Demirjian’s original method in forensic age estimation using a sample of Portuguese children.

Methods

564 panoramic radiographs of Portuguese boys and girls between 6 and 16 years of age were evaluated using Demirjian’s method. Dental age (DA) was determined using the 50th percentile for the maturity score obtained for each age group. The mean difference between chronological age (CA) and dental age (DA) and the mean absolute difference between CA and DA were calculated for each age group. Paired t tests were used to test the statistical significance of mean differences between CA and DA. For each individual, a 94 % confidence interval was calculated for estimated DA, using the 3rd and 97th percentiles in Demirjian’s conversion tables.

Results

Chronological age was overestimated in boys, in every age group; mean differences between CA and DA were statistically significant, expect for age 7. In girls, chronological age was overestimated in the 10–15 year-old age group. The difference between CA and DA was highest in the 12 years olds for both sexes. The 94 % confidence intervals did not include the true chronological age in all 6, 13, and 15 year-old girls, and all 14 and 15 year-old boys. Only a small portion of the individuals in the remaining age groups had their true chronological age falling within the probable age interval.

Conclusions

Results show a systematic bias and consistent inaccuracy in estimating age from dental development using Demirjian’s original method, making this methodology unsuitable for age estimation in the study sample. These results add to published evidence which suggests that Demirjian’s method is not suitable and should be abandoned altogether for forensic age estimation purposes.
Literature
1.
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):211–27.PubMed
2.
Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(2):155–66.PubMed
3.
Sahin Saglam AM, Gazilerli U. The relationship between dental and skeletal maturity. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63(6):454–62.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bagherpour A, Imanimoghaddam M, Bagherpour MR, Einolghozati M. Dental age assessment among Iranian children aged 6–13 years using the Demirjian method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1–3):121 e1–4.
5.
Celikoglu M, Cantekin K, Ceylan I. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian method in eastern Turkish children. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S220–2.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Chaillet N, Willems G, Demirjian A. Dental maturity in Belgian children using Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions: new standard curves for forensic and clinical use. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2004;22(2):18–27.PubMed
7.
Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 1998;94(1–2):73–85.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Lee SS, Kim D, Lee S, Lee UY, Seo JS, Ahn YW, et al. Validity of Demirjian’s and modified Demirjian’s methods in age estimation for Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;211(1–3):41–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Tunc ES, Koyuturk AE. Dental age assessment using Demirjian’s method on northern Turkish children. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;175(1):23–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian’s technique revisited. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(4):893–5.PubMed
11.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Liversidge HM. The assessment and interpretation of Demirjian, Goldstein and Tanner’s dental maturity. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39(5):412–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Flood SJ, Mitchell WJ, Oxnard CE, Turlach BA, McGeachie J. A comparison of Demirjian’s four dental development methods for forensic age assessment. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(6):1610–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Blenkin MR, Evans W. Age estimation from the teeth using a modified Demirjian system. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(6):1504–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Goya HA, Satake H, Maeda T, Tanaka S, Akimoto Y. Dental age in Japanese children using a modified Demirjian method. Pediatr Dent J. 2009;19(1):82–8.CrossRef
16.
Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001;19(1):9–17.PubMed
17.
Chaillet N, Nystrom M, Kataja M, Demirjian A. Dental maturity curves in Finnish children: Demirjian’s method revisited and polynomial functions for age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):1324–31.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP. Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S68–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Foti B, Lalys L, Adalian P, Giustiniani J, Maczel M, Signoli M, et al. New forensic approach to age determination in children based on tooth eruption. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;132(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Gleiser I, Hunt EE Jr. The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(2):253–83.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Gustafson G, Koch G. Age estimation up to 16 years of age based on dental development. Odontol Revy. 1974;25(3):297–306.PubMed
22.
Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim. 1970;66(3):103–70.PubMed
23.
Hagg U, Matsson L. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod. 1985;7(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Harris MJP, Nortje CJ. The mesial root of the third mandibular molar. A possible indicator of age. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1985;2:39–43.
25.
Hunt EE Jr, Gleiser I. The estimation of age and sex of preadolescent children from bones and teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(3):479–87.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kullman L, Johanson G, Akesson L. Root development of the lower third molar and its relation to chronological age. Swed Dent J. 1992;16(4):161–7.PubMed
27.
Liliequist B, Lundberg M. Skeletal and tooth development. A methodologic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1971;11(2):97–112.
28.
Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1490–502.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254–66.
30.
Frucht S, Schnegelsberg C, Schulte-Monting J, Rose E, Jonas I. Dental age in southwest Germany. A radiographic study. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(5):318–29.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Chen JW, Guo J, Zhou J, Liu RK, Chen TT, Zou SJ. Assessment of dental maturity of western Chinese children using Demirjian’s method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1–3):119 e1–4.
Metadata
Title
Is Demirjian’s original method really useful for age estimation in a forensic context?
Authors
José Luís Carneiro
Inês Morais Caldas
Américo Afonso
Hugo Filipe Violante Cardoso
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9656-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

The use of computed tomography in determining development, anomalies, and trauma of the hyoid bone

Images in Forensics

Suicidal Krönlein shot with a home manufactured firearm

Original Article

Quantification of morphine, morphine 6-glucuronide, buprenorphine, and the enantiomers of methadone by enantioselective mass spectrometric chromatography in whole blood

Forensic Forum

Overlaying, co-sleeping, suffocation, and sudden infant death syndrome: the elephant in the room

Commentary

Co-sleeping and suffocation

Commentary

Co-sleeping and suffocation