Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Clinical Research

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees

Authors: Chuan Kong Koh, MBChB, Irene Zeng, PhD, Saiprassad Ravi, MBChB, Mark Zhu, MBChB, Kelly G. Vince, MD, Simon W. Young, FRACS

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although large series from national joint registries may accurately reflect indications for revision TKAs, they may lack the granularity to detect the true incidence and relative importance of such indications, especially periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Questions/purposes

Using a combination of individual chart review supplemented with New Zealand Joint Registry data, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of revision TKA? (2) What are the common indications for revising a contemporary primary TKA? (3) Do revision TKA indications differ at various followup times after primary TKA?

Methods

We identified 11,134 primary TKAs performed between 2000 and 2015 in three tertiary referral hospitals. The New Zealand Joint Registry and individual patient chart review were used to identify 357 patients undergoing subsequent revision surgery or any reoperation for PJI. All clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory results were reviewed to identify the primary revision reason. The cumulative incidence of each revision reason was calculated using a competing risk estimator.

Results

The cumulative incidence for revision TKA at 15 years followup was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.1%–7.1%). The two most-common revision reasons at 15 years followup were PJI followed by aseptic loosening. The risk of revision or reoperation for PJI was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.7%–2.3%) and aseptic loosening was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.7%–1.6%). Approximately half of the revision TKAs secondary to PJI occurred within 2 years of the index TKA (95% CI, 0.8%–1.2%), whereas half of the revision TKAs secondary to aseptic loosening occurred 8 years after the index TKA (95% CI, 0.4%–0.7%).

Conclusions

In this large cohort of patients with comprehensive followup of revision procedures, PJI was the dominant reason for failure during the first 15 years after primary TKA. Aseptic loosening became more important with longer followup. Efforts to improve outcome after primary TKA should focus on these areas, particularly prevention of PJI.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Barr CJ, Barbalace RJ, Wessinger SJ, Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Malchau H. Validation of a hospital-based joint registry: quantification of errors and maximizing utility. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1766–1771.CrossRefPubMed Barr CJ, Barbalace RJ, Wessinger SJ, Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Malchau H. Validation of a hospital-based joint registry: quantification of errors and maximizing utility. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1766–1771.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26–434.CrossRef Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26–434.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Braun TM, Yuan Z. Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks. Stat Med. 2007;26:1170–1180.CrossRefPubMed Braun TM, Yuan Z. Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks. Stat Med. 2007;26:1170–1180.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):120–121.CrossRefPubMed Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):120–121.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:315–318.CrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:315–318.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.CrossRef Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Manktelow AR, Skinner JA. Publication of surgeon level data from registers: who benefits? Bone Joint J. 2016;98:1–2.CrossRefPubMed Haddad FS, Manktelow AR, Skinner JA. Publication of surgeon level data from registers: who benefits? Bone Joint J. 2016;98:1–2.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huang R, Hu CC, Adeli B, Mortazavi J, Parvizi J. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2717–2723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang R, Hu CC, Adeli B, Mortazavi J, Parvizi J. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2717–2723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:375–386.CrossRefPubMed Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:375–386.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lindgren JV, Gordon M, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. Validation of reoperations due to infection in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lindgren JV, Gordon M, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. Validation of reoperations due to infection in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Mandalia V, Eyres K, Schranz P, Toms AD. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:265–271.CrossRefPubMed Mandalia V, Eyres K, Schranz P, Toms AD. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:265–271.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 1):264–270.CrossRefPubMed Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 1):264–270.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Niinimäki TT. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries. Knee. 2015;22:142–144.CrossRefPubMed Niinimäki TT. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries. Knee. 2015;22:142–144.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Valle Della CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992–2994.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Valle Della CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992–2994.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Porcher R. CORR Insights®: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis overestimates the risk of revision arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3443–3445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Porcher R. CORR Insights®: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis overestimates the risk of revision arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3443–3445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Nunley RM. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):116–119.CrossRefPubMed Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Nunley RM. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):116–119.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.CrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today: has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1774–1778.CrossRefPubMed Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today: has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1774–1778.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Siqueira MB, Klika AK, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK. Modes of failure of total knee arthroplasty: registries and realities. J Knee Surg. 2014;28:127–138.CrossRefPubMed Siqueira MB, Klika AK, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK. Modes of failure of total knee arthroplasty: registries and realities. J Knee Surg. 2014;28:127–138.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr HO, Sostheim M, Hube R. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:715–720.CrossRefPubMed Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr HO, Sostheim M, Hube R. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:715–720.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Vince KG. Diagnosis and management of patients with instability of the knee. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:515–524.PubMed Vince KG. Diagnosis and management of patients with instability of the knee. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:515–524.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Vince KG. The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation. Bone Joint J. 2014;96(11 suppl A):105–111. Vince KG. The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation. Bone Joint J. 2014;96(11 suppl A):105–111.
27.
go back to reference Vyskocil P, Gerber C, Bamert P. Radiolucent lines and component stability in knee arthroplasty: standard versus fluoroscopically-assisted radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:24–26.CrossRefPubMed Vyskocil P, Gerber C, Bamert P. Radiolucent lines and component stability in knee arthroplasty: standard versus fluoroscopically-assisted radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:24–26.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhu M, Ravi S, Frampton C, Luey C, Young S. New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:346–350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhu M, Ravi S, Frampton C, Luey C, Young S. New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:346–350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees
Authors
Chuan Kong Koh, MBChB
Irene Zeng, PhD
Saiprassad Ravi, MBChB
Mark Zhu, MBChB
Kelly G. Vince, MD
Simon W. Young, FRACS
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2017 Go to the issue