Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Medicolegal Sidebar

Medicolegal Sidebar: Expanding Hospital Liability—The Concept of Willful Blindness

Authors: Lawrence H. Brenner, JD, Wendy Z. W. Teo, BA (Cantab), BM, BCh (Oxon), B. Sonny Bal, MD, JD, MBA, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Healthcare spending in the United States far exceeds that of other nations such as Australia, United Kingdom, France, and Germany [7]. In fact, US healthcare expenditures in 2015 increased 5.8% over the previous year, to reach USD 3.2 trillion, or close to USD 10,000 per person [1]. The federal government is concerned that healthcare fraud may contribute to higher healthcare costs. Accordingly, federal prosecutors have aggressively targeted physicians and other healthcare providers who are suspected of fraudulent billing practices, under a statute titled 18 U.S.C. § 1347 [4]. This statute addresses providers who attempt to defraud any healthcare benefit program through false billings or other misrepresentations that are designed to obtain money from the program. If convicted, a defendant charged under § 1347 can face fines and prison. The statute specifies that a guilty party need not have actual knowledge of the relevant law, nor even have a specific intent to commit a violation of such a law in order for the government to obtain a conviction. Since elective orthopaedic operations, such as knee arthroscopy, total joint arthroplasty, and spinal disc excision are high-volume operations that may be done in surgeon-owned facilities, the profession is particularly likely to attract scrutiny by government payers. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Darling v Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill2d 326, 211 NE2d 253 (1965). Darling v Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill2d 326, 211 NE2d 253 (1965).
3.
go back to reference Global-Tech Appliances Inc. v SEB S.A., 563 U.S. 754 (2011). Global-Tech Appliances Inc. v SEB S.A., 563 U.S. 754 (2011).
5.
go back to reference Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Hayes CW. Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: A multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2134–2143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Hayes CW. Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: A multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2134–2143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference United States v McLean, 715 F3d 129 (4th Cir. 2013). United States v McLean, 715 F3d 129 (4th Cir. 2013).
Metadata
Title
Medicolegal Sidebar: Expanding Hospital Liability—The Concept of Willful Blindness
Authors
Lawrence H. Brenner, JD
Wendy Z. W. Teo, BA (Cantab), BM, BCh (Oxon)
B. Sonny Bal, MD, JD, MBA, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5282-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2017 Go to the issue