Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Clinical Research

Is There Benefit to Free Over Pedicled Vascularized Grafts in Augmenting Tibial Intercalary Allograft Constructs?

Authors: Marco Manfrini, MD, Srimanth Bindiganavile, MD, Ferhat Say, MD, Marco Colangeli, MD, Laura Campanacci, MD, Massimiliano Depaolis, MD, Massimo Ceruso, MD, Davide Donati, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intercalary reconstruction of tibial sarcomas with vascularized fibula autografts and massive bone allografts is reliable with predictable long-term results. However, inadequate data exist comparing free and pedicled vascularized fibula autografts in combination with a massive bone allograft in patients undergoing intercalary tibia reconstructions.

Questions/Purposes

Among patients undergoing large-segment intercalary allografting, we sought to compare supplemental free vascularized fibular autografts with supplemental pedicled vascularized fibular autografts, in terms of (1) oncologic results, (2) complications associated with surgery, (3) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, and (4) surgical time.

Methods

Between 1994 and 2013, we treated 320 patients, younger than 40 years, with tibial sarcomas. Thirty-five patients (11%) underwent amputations. One hundred ninety-five patients (61%) were treated with intraarticular resection of the tibia, which constituted 104 tumor endoprostheses, 63 proximal tibia allograft prosthetic composites, 21 osteoarticular allografts, and seven arthrodeses with allografts. Ninety patients (28%) underwent joint-sparing intercalary reconstruction. Forty-one (13%) of these 90 patients were treated with allografts alone, two (1%) with vascularized fibula grafts, and 47 (15%) with intercalary allografts supplemented by autografts (free fibular autografts, 22 patients, 7%; pedicled fibular autografts, 25 patients, 8%). During the study period, we used free vascularized fibular autografts in association with massive bone allograft for a resection longer than 12 cm with a very small periarticular residual segment. The choice for using a pedicled fibula harvested in the ipsilateral leg initially was for patients having only diaphyseal resections and the indication was later extended to intraepiphyseal osteotomies with a small periarticular residual segment. The goals of this study are to present the long-term results in this group of patients and compare their results based on the type of vascularized fibula harvest. There were 33 male and 14 female patients with mean age of 14 ± 6 years. The median followup was 84 months (range, 7–231 months). No patients were lost to followup before 1 year. Four patients died and were not available for followup after 18 months. The mean tibia resection length was 15 ± 4 cm and mean length of the harvested vascularized fibula was 18 ± 4 cm.

Results

Overall 5- and 10-year oncologic survival rates in this study were 87% ± 5% and 83% ± 6% respectively. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in survivorship free from death from disease between the study groups (85% ± 8% [95% CI, 174–232 months] of the free vascularized group versus 82% ± 8% [95% CI, 148–206 months] of the pedicled fibula graft group; p = 0.741). At last followup, 40 patients had no evidence of disease and seven had died of disease. Local recurrence was observed in two patients in the supplemental free vascularized fibula group and three patients in the supplemental pedicled vascularized fibula group, whereas metastases was observed in eight patients. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing surgical complications between those treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (eight of 22 [36%] versus nine of 25 [36%] respectively; p = 0.605). With the numbers available, we observed no difference in mean MSTS scores between patients treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (24 ± 9 versus 25 ± 8; mean difference, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.54–4.6; p = 0.858). Mean surgical time was longer in the free vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 9.4 ± 1.7 hours compared with that of the pedicled vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 5.7 ± 1.3 hours (mean difference, 3.73 hours; 95% CI, 2.8–4.6 hours; p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Intercalary reconstruction of tibia sarcomas with massive bone allografts supplemented with vascularized fibula grafts provide predictable results. Complications occur as expected in a biologic reconstruction, but are salvageable, preserving the original construct. The pedicled fibula can be an alternative to a free contralateral fibula for intraepiphyseal resections. Comparative technical ease, shorter surgical time, avoidance of additional microvascular anastomosis, and avoidance of surgery on the contralateral leg are notable advantages of pedicled vascularized fibula over free fibula grafts to supplement allografts when indicated in intercalary tibia resections.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abed YY, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA, Innocenti M, Scoccianti G, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumours around the knee: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1366–1372.CrossRefPubMed Abed YY, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA, Innocenti M, Scoccianti G, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumours around the knee: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1366–1372.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Atkins RM, Madhavan P, Sudhakar J, Whitwell D. Ipsilateral vascularised fibular transport for massive defects of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:1035–1040.CrossRefPubMed Atkins RM, Madhavan P, Sudhakar J, Whitwell D. Ipsilateral vascularised fibular transport for massive defects of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:1035–1040.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bullens PH, Minderhoud NM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Veth RP, Buma P, Schreuder HW. Survival of massive allografts in segmental oncological bone defect reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2009;33:757–760.CrossRefPubMed Bullens PH, Minderhoud NM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Veth RP, Buma P, Schreuder HW. Survival of massive allografts in segmental oncological bone defect reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2009;33:757–760.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Campanacci DA, Puccini S, Caff G, Beltrami G, Piccioli A, Innocenti M, Capanna R. Vascularised fibular grafts as a salvage procedure in failed intercalary reconstructions after bone tumour resection of the femur. Injury. 2014;45:399–404.CrossRefPubMed Campanacci DA, Puccini S, Caff G, Beltrami G, Piccioli A, Innocenti M, Capanna R. Vascularised fibular grafts as a salvage procedure in failed intercalary reconstructions after bone tumour resection of the femur. Injury. 2014;45:399–404.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Campanacci L, Manfrini M, Colangeli M, Alí N, Mercuri M. Long-term results in children with massive bone osteoarticular allografts of the knee for high-grade osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:919–927.CrossRefPubMed Campanacci L, Manfrini M, Colangeli M, Alí N, Mercuri M. Long-term results in children with massive bone osteoarticular allografts of the knee for high-grade osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:919–927.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cao QL, Wang Z, Yu XW, Teng Y, Zhang QJ, Cai JY. [Comparison of long bone repair in tibia by vascularized fibular grafting of different sides][in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002;16:109–111.PubMed Cao QL, Wang Z, Yu XW, Teng Y, Zhang QJ, Cai JY. [Comparison of long bone repair in tibia by vascularized fibular grafting of different sides][in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002;16:109–111.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Capanna R, Campanacci DA, Belot N, Beltrami G, Manfrini M, Innocenti M, Ceruso M. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:51–60, vi. Capanna R, Campanacci DA, Belot N, Beltrami G, Manfrini M, Innocenti M, Ceruso M. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:51–60, vi.
8.
go back to reference Ceruso M, Falcone C, Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Capanna R, Manfrini M. Skeletal reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft associated to bone allograft after resection of malignant bone tumor of limbs. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2001;33:277–282.CrossRefPubMed Ceruso M, Falcone C, Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Capanna R, Manfrini M. Skeletal reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft associated to bone allograft after resection of malignant bone tumor of limbs. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2001;33:277–282.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ceruso M, Taddei F, Bigazzi P, Manfrini M. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: considerations on the bio-mechanical behaviour of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury. 2008;39(suppl 3):S68–S74.CrossRefPubMed Ceruso M, Taddei F, Bigazzi P, Manfrini M. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: considerations on the bio-mechanical behaviour of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury. 2008;39(suppl 3):S68–S74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chang DW, Weber KL. Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap and intercalary allograft for diaphyseal reconstruction after resection of primary extremity bone sarcomas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1918–1925.CrossRefPubMed Chang DW, Weber KL. Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap and intercalary allograft for diaphyseal reconstruction after resection of primary extremity bone sarcomas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1918–1925.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chung YK, Chung S. Ipsilateral island fibula transfer for segmental tibial defects: antegrade and retrograde fashion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:375–382; discussion 383–384. Chung YK, Chung S. Ipsilateral island fibula transfer for segmental tibial defects: antegrade and retrograde fashion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:375–382; discussion 383–384.
12.
go back to reference Ebeid W, Amin S, Abdelmegid A, Refaat Y, Ghoneimy A. Reconstruction of distal tibial defects following resection of malignant tumours by pedicled vascularised fibular grafts. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:354–359.PubMed Ebeid W, Amin S, Abdelmegid A, Refaat Y, Ghoneimy A. Reconstruction of distal tibial defects following resection of malignant tumours by pedicled vascularised fibular grafts. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:354–359.PubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Sherbiny M. Long term behavior of pedicled vascularized fibular grafts in reconstruction of middle and distal tibia after resection of malignant bone tumors. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;20:187–195. El-Sherbiny M. Long term behavior of pedicled vascularized fibular grafts in reconstruction of middle and distal tibia after resection of malignant bone tumors. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;20:187–195.
14.
go back to reference Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.
15.
go back to reference Ferrari S, Ruggieri P, Cefalo G, Tamburini A, Capanna R, Fagioli F, Comandone A, Bertulli R, Bisogno G, Palmerini E, Alberghini M, Parafioriti A, Picci, P, Bacci G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: an Italian sarcoma group trial ISG/OS-1. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2112–2118.CrossRefPubMed Ferrari S, Ruggieri P, Cefalo G, Tamburini A, Capanna R, Fagioli F, Comandone A, Bertulli R, Bisogno G, Palmerini E, Alberghini M, Parafioriti A, Picci, P, Bacci G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: an Italian sarcoma group trial ISG/OS-1. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2112–2118.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ferrari S, Sundby Hall K, Luksch R, Tienghi A, Wiebe T, Fagioli F, Alvegard TA, Brach Del Prever A, Tamburini A, Alberghini M, Gandola L, Mercuri M, Capanna R, Mapelli S, Prete A, Carli M, Picci P, Barbieri E, Bacci G, Smeland S. Nonmetastatic Ewing family tumors: high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in poor responder patients: results of the Italian Sarcoma Group/Scandinavian Sarcoma Group III protocol. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1221–1227.CrossRefPubMed Ferrari S, Sundby Hall K, Luksch R, Tienghi A, Wiebe T, Fagioli F, Alvegard TA, Brach Del Prever A, Tamburini A, Alberghini M, Gandola L, Mercuri M, Capanna R, Mapelli S, Prete A, Carli M, Picci P, Barbieri E, Bacci G, Smeland S. Nonmetastatic Ewing family tumors: high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in poor responder patients: results of the Italian Sarcoma Group/Scandinavian Sarcoma Group III protocol. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1221–1227.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Frisoni T, Cevolani L, Giorgini A, Dozza B, Donati DM. Factors affecting outcome of massive intercalary bone allografts in the treatment of tumours of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:836–841.CrossRefPubMed Frisoni T, Cevolani L, Giorgini A, Dozza B, Donati DM. Factors affecting outcome of massive intercalary bone allografts in the treatment of tumours of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:836–841.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fuchs B, Ossendorf C, Leerapun T, Sim FH. Intercalary segmental reconstruction after bone tumor resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1271–1276.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs B, Ossendorf C, Leerapun T, Sim FH. Intercalary segmental reconstruction after bone tumor resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1271–1276.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hatori M, Ayoub KS, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. The two-stage ipsilateral fibular transfer for tibial defect following tumour excision. Sarcoma. 2000;4:27–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hatori M, Ayoub KS, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. The two-stage ipsilateral fibular transfer for tibial defect following tumour excision. Sarcoma. 2000;4:27–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Innocenti M, Abed YY, Beltrami G, Delcroix L, Manfrini M, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumors of the proximal tibia using allograft shell and intramedullary free vascularized fibular graft: long-term results. Microsurgery 2009;29:361–372.CrossRefPubMed Innocenti M, Abed YY, Beltrami G, Delcroix L, Manfrini M, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumors of the proximal tibia using allograft shell and intramedullary free vascularized fibular graft: long-term results. Microsurgery 2009;29:361–372.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jager T, Journeau P, Dautel G, Barbary S, Haumont T, Lascombes P. Is combining massive bone allograft with free vascularized fibular flap the children’s reconstruction answer to lower limb defects following bone tumour resection? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:340–347.CrossRefPubMed Jager T, Journeau P, Dautel G, Barbary S, Haumont T, Lascombes P. Is combining massive bone allograft with free vascularized fibular flap the children’s reconstruction answer to lower limb defects following bone tumour resection? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:340–347.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Fu J, Pei GX. The use of allograft shell with intramedullary vascularized fibula graft for intercalary reconstruction after diaphyseal resection for lower extremity bony malignancy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:368–374.CrossRefPubMed Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Fu J, Pei GX. The use of allograft shell with intramedullary vascularized fibula graft for intercalary reconstruction after diaphyseal resection for lower extremity bony malignancy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:368–374.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Li SW, Pei GX. The use of massive allograft with intramedullary fibular graft for intercalary reconstruction after resection of tibial malignancy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27:37–46.CrossRefPubMed Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Li SW, Pei GX. The use of massive allograft with intramedullary fibular graft for intercalary reconstruction after resection of tibial malignancy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27:37–46.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Manfrini M, Gasbarrini A, Malaguti C, Ceruso M, Innocenti M, Bini S, Capanna R, Campanacci M. Intraepiphyseal resection of the proximal tibia and its impact on lower limb growth. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1999;358:111–119. Manfrini M, Gasbarrini A, Malaguti C, Ceruso M, Innocenti M, Bini S, Capanna R, Campanacci M. Intraepiphyseal resection of the proximal tibia and its impact on lower limb growth. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1999;358:111–119.
25.
go back to reference Manfrini M, Vanel D, De Paolis M, Malaguti C, Innocenti M, Ceruso M, Capanna R, Mercuri M. Imaging of vascularized fibula autograft placed inside a massive allograft in reconstruction of lower limb bone tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:963–970.CrossRefPubMed Manfrini M, Vanel D, De Paolis M, Malaguti C, Innocenti M, Ceruso M, Capanna R, Mercuri M. Imaging of vascularized fibula autograft placed inside a massive allograft in reconstruction of lower limb bone tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:963–970.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Moran SL, Shin AY, Bishop AT. The use of massive bone allograft with intramedullary free fibular flap for limb salvage in a pediatric and adolescent population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:413–419.CrossRefPubMed Moran SL, Shin AY, Bishop AT. The use of massive bone allograft with intramedullary free fibular flap for limb salvage in a pediatric and adolescent population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:413–419.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference O’Flanagan SJ, Stack JP, McGee HM, Dervan P, Hurson B. Imaging of intramedullary tumour spread in osteosarcoma: a comparison of techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:998–1001.PubMed O’Flanagan SJ, Stack JP, McGee HM, Dervan P, Hurson B. Imaging of intramedullary tumour spread in osteosarcoma: a comparison of techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:998–1001.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ozaki T, Fujiwara K, Kunisada T, Ito T, Kawai A, Inoue H. Reconstruction with ipsilateral fibula transfer with pasteurized bone after excision of bone sarcoma of the tibia. Sarcoma. 2004;8:97–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozaki T, Fujiwara K, Kunisada T, Ito T, Kawai A, Inoue H. Reconstruction with ipsilateral fibula transfer with pasteurized bone after excision of bone sarcoma of the tibia. Sarcoma. 2004;8:97–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. Reconstruction of tibia by ipsilateral vascularized fibula and allograft: 12 cases with malignant bone tumors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:298–301.CrossRefPubMed Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. Reconstruction of tibia by ipsilateral vascularized fibula and allograft: 12 cases with malignant bone tumors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:298–301.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Puri A, Subin BS, Agarwal MG. Fibular centralisation for the reconstruction of defects of the tibial diaphysis and distal metaphysis after excision of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:234–239.CrossRefPubMed Puri A, Subin BS, Agarwal MG. Fibular centralisation for the reconstruction of defects of the tibial diaphysis and distal metaphysis after excision of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:234–239.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Thompson RC Jr, Pickvance EA, Garry D. Fractures in large-segment allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1663–1673.CrossRefPubMed Thompson RC Jr, Pickvance EA, Garry D. Fractures in large-segment allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1663–1673.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Weber KL. What’s new in musculoskeletal oncology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1400–1410.PubMed Weber KL. What’s new in musculoskeletal oncology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1400–1410.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Wood MB. Free vascularized fibular grafting-25 years’ experience: tips, techniques, and pearls. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:1–12, v. Wood MB. Free vascularized fibular grafting-25 years’ experience: tips, techniques, and pearls. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:1–12, v.
Metadata
Title
Is There Benefit to Free Over Pedicled Vascularized Grafts in Augmenting Tibial Intercalary Allograft Constructs?
Authors
Marco Manfrini, MD
Srimanth Bindiganavile, MD
Ferhat Say, MD
Marco Colangeli, MD
Laura Campanacci, MD
Massimiliano Depaolis, MD
Massimo Ceruso, MD
Davide Donati, MD
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5196-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2017 Go to the issue