Published in:
01-07-2016 | Symposium: Proceedings of the 2015 Musculoskeletal Infection Society
The ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator Is a Fair Predictor of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 7/2016
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication from the patient’s perspective and an expensive one in a value-driven healthcare model. Risk stratification can help identify those patients who may have risk factors for complications that can be mitigated in advance of elective surgery. Although numerous surgical risk calculators have been created, their accuracy in predicting outcomes, specifically PJI, has not been tested.
Questions/Purposes
(1) How accurate is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Site Infection Calculator in predicting 30-day postoperative infection? (2) How accurate is the calculator in predicting 90-day postoperative infection?
Methods
We isolated 1536 patients who underwent 1620 primary THAs and TKAs at our institution during 2011 to 2013. Minimum followup was 90 days. The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator was assessed in its ability to predict acute PJI within 30 and 90 days postoperatively. Patients who underwent a repeat surgical procedure within 90 days of the index arthroplasty and in whom at least one positive intraoperative culture was obtained at time of reoperation were considered to have PJI. A total of 19 cases of PJI were identified, including 11 at 30 days and an additional eight instances by 90 days postoperatively. Patient-specific risk probabilities for PJI based on demographics and comorbidities were recorded from the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator website. The area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was calculated to determine the predictability of the risk probability for PJI. The AUC is an effective method for quantifying the discriminatory capacity of a diagnostic test to correctly classify patients with and without infection in which it is defined as excellent (AUC 0.9–1), good (AUC 0.8–0.89), fair (AUC 0.7–0.79), poor (AUC 0.6–0.69), or fail/no discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.5–0.59). A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator showed only fair accuracy in predicting 30-day PJI (AUC: 74.3% [confidence interval {CI}, 59.6%–89.0%]. For 90-day PJI, the risk calculator was also only fair in accuracy (AUC: 71.3% [CI, 59.9%–82.6%]). Conclusions The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator is a fair predictor of acute PJI at the 30- and 90-day intervals after primary THA and TKA. Practitioners should exercise caution in using this tool as a predictive aid for PJI, because it demonstrates only fair value in this application. Existing predictive tools for PJI could potentially be made more robust by incorporating preoperative risk factors and including operative and early postoperative variables.
Level of Evidence
Level III, diagnostic study.