Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 10/2015

01-10-2015 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Author: Gereon Schiffer, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

The integration of evidence-based medicine, while clinically important for diagnosis and treatment, generally faces two problems: First, collecting reliable, high-level data remains difficult. This is especially true for patients with acute trauma as those trauma settings rarely allow for relaxed, informative conversations. Related to this, patients in these stressful settings often prefer the physician’s recommendations pertaining to therapy. They normally have a limited interest in our unsolved problems, and even less interest in being randomized to therapies with uncertain benefits. …
Literature
1.
Kim JK, Park ES. Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1406–1411.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008–1018.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:641–649.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CORR Insights®: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures
Author
Gereon Schiffer, MD
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4452-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 10/2015 Go to the issue

Symposium: Award Papers From Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2014

Surgical Treatment of Hip Instability in Patients With Lower Lumbar Level Myelomeningocele: Is Muscle Transfer Required?

Clinical Research

Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA

Basic Research

Intraarticular Matrix Metalloproteinases and Aggrecan Degradation Are Elevated After Articular Fracture

Basic Research

Immunohistochemical Mapping of Sensory Nerve Endings in the Human Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex

Symposium: 2014 Annual Meeting of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society

Editorial Comment: 2014 Annual Meeting of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society

Symposium: 2014 Annual Meeting of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society

Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?