Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016 | Symposium: 2015 Hip Society Proceedings

John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA

Authors: Jonathan L. Berliner, MD, Dane J. Brodke, BA, Vanessa Chan, MPH, Nelson F. SooHoo, MD, Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the overall effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA), a subset of patients remain dissatisfied with their results because of persistent pain or functional limitations. It is therefore important to develop predictive tools capable of identifying patients at risk for poor outcomes before surgery.

Questions/purposes

The purpose of this study was to use preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores to predict which patients undergoing THA are most likely to experience a clinically meaningful change in functional outcome 1 year after surgery.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study design was used to evaluate preoperative and 1-year postoperative SF-12 version 2 (SF12v2) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) scores from 537 selected patients who underwent primary unilateral THA. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated using a distribution-based method. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate threshold values, defined as the levels at which substantial changes occurred, and their predictive ability. MCID values for HOOS and SF12v2 physical component summary (PCS) scores were calculated to be 9.1 and 4.6, respectively. We analyzed the effect of SF12v2 mental component summary (MCS) scores, which measure mental and emotional health, on SF12v2 PCS and HOOS threshold values.

Results

Threshold values for preoperative HOOS and PCS scores were a maximum of 51.0 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; p < 0.001) and 32.5 (AUC, 0.62; p < 0.001), respectively. As preoperative mental and emotional health improved, which was reflected by a higher MCS score, HOOS and PCS threshold values also increased. When preoperative mental and emotional health were taken into account, both HOOS and PCS threshold values’ predictive ability improved (AUCs increased to 0.77 and 0.69, respectively).

Conclusions

We identified PROM threshold values that predict clinically meaningful improvements in functional outcome after THA. Patients with a higher level of preoperative function, as suggested by HOOS or PCS scores above the defined threshold values, are less likely to obtain meaningful improvement after THA. Lower preoperative mental and emotional health decreases the likelihood of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA. The results of this study may be used to facilitate discussion between physicians and patients regarding the expected benefit after THA and to support the development of patient-based informed decision-making tools. For example, despite significant disease, patients with high preoperative function, as measured by PROM scores, may choose to delay surgery given the low likelihood of experiencing a meaningful improvement postoperatively. Similarly, patients with notably low MCS scores might best be counseled to address mental health issues before embarking on surgery.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prognostic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:209–213.PubMedCrossRef Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:209–213.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ring DC. The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e165.PubMedPubMedCentral Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ring DC. The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e165.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Freund D. Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:125–130.PubMedCrossRef Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Freund D. Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:125–130.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000435.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000435.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braeken AM, Lochhaas-Gerlach JA, Gollish JD, Myles JD, Mackenzie TA. Determinants of 6–12 month postoperative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997;9:413–418.PubMed Braeken AM, Lochhaas-Gerlach JA, Gollish JD, Myles JD, Mackenzie TA. Determinants of 6–12 month postoperative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997;9:413–418.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Browne JA, Sandberg BF, D’Apuzzo MR, Novicoff WM. Depression is associated with early postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;29:481–483.PubMedCrossRef Browne JA, Sandberg BF, D’Apuzzo MR, Novicoff WM. Depression is associated with early postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;29:481–483.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, Davis AM. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:907–918.PubMedCrossRef Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, Davis AM. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:907–918.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7:541–546.PubMedCrossRef Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7:541–546.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Duivenvoorden T, Vissers MM, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Gosens T, Bloem RM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1834–1840.PubMedCrossRef Duivenvoorden T, Vissers MM, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Gosens T, Bloem RM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1834–1840.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Ibañez B, Arenaza JC, Gutiérrez L, Azkárate J, Güenaga JI, Vidaurreta I. Development of explicit criteria for prioritization of hip and knee replacement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:429–434.PubMedCrossRef Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Ibañez B, Arenaza JC, Gutiérrez L, Azkárate J, Güenaga JI, Vidaurreta I. Development of explicit criteria for prioritization of hip and knee replacement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:429–434.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–974.PubMed Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–974.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Fisher ES, Bell J-E, Tomek IM, Esty AR, Goodman DC. Trends and Regional Variation in Hip, Knee, and Shoulder Replacement. Dartmouth Atlas Surgery Report. Hanover, NH, USA: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2010. Fisher ES, Bell J-E, Tomek IM, Esty AR, Goodman DC. Trends and Regional Variation in Hip, Knee, and Shoulder Replacement. Dartmouth Atlas Surgery Report. Hanover, NH, USA: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2010.
13.
go back to reference Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Bélisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722–1728.PubMedCrossRef Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Bélisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722–1728.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:2415–2418.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:2415–2418.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? Spine J. 2010;10:321–327.PubMedCrossRef Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? Spine J. 2010;10:321–327.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Behrend H, Giesinger K. Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Behrend H, Giesinger K. Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gortmaker SL, Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. Contemp Sociol. 1994;23:159.CrossRef Gortmaker SL, Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. Contemp Sociol. 1994;23:159.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Greene ME, Rolfson O, Gordon M, Garellick G, Nemes S. Standard comorbidity measures do not predict patient-reported outcomes 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb 21 [Epub ahead of print]. Greene ME, Rolfson O, Gordon M, Garellick G, Nemes S. Standard comorbidity measures do not predict patient-reported outcomes 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb 21 [Epub ahead of print].
19.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–629.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–629.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163–173.PubMed Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163–173.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;18:419–423.PubMedCrossRef Hays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;18:419–423.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1942–1948.PubMed Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1942–1948.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hopman WM, Mantle M, Towheed TE, MacKenzie TA. Determinants of health-related quality of life following elective total hip replacement. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:110–116.PubMedCrossRef Hopman WM, Mantle M, Towheed TE, MacKenzie TA. Determinants of health-related quality of life following elective total hip replacement. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:110–116.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.PubMedCrossRef Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DWC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33:71–86.PubMedCrossRef Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DWC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33:71–86.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Judge A, Arden NK, Price A, Glyn-Jones S, Beard D, Carr AJ, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Field RE. Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1660–1664.PubMedCrossRef Judge A, Arden NK, Price A, Glyn-Jones S, Beard D, Carr AJ, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Field RE. Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1660–1664.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, McCarthy BD, Ward RE. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:623–638.PubMedPubMedCentral MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, McCarthy BD, Ward RE. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:623–638.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference McGlothlin A, Lewis R. Minimal Clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014;312:1342–1343.PubMedCrossRef McGlothlin A, Lewis R. Minimal Clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014;312:1342–1343.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McGuigan F, Hozack W, Moriarty L. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:742–747.PubMedCrossRef McGuigan F, Hozack W, Moriarty L. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:742–747.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Nilsdotter A, Petersson I. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheumatol Dis. 2003;62:923–930.CrossRef Nilsdotter A, Petersson I. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheumatol Dis. 2003;62:923–930.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Norman G, Sloan J, Wyrwich K. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.PubMed Norman G, Sloan J, Wyrwich K. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Quintana JM, Aróstegui I, Azkarate J, Ignacio Goenaga J, Elexpe X, Letona J, Arcelay A. Evaluation of explicit criteria for total hip joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1200–1208.PubMedCrossRef Quintana JM, Aróstegui I, Azkarate J, Ignacio Goenaga J, Elexpe X, Letona J, Arcelay A. Evaluation of explicit criteria for total hip joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1200–1208.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:1076–1083.PubMedCrossRef Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:1076–1083.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rat A-C, Guillemin F, Osnowycz G, Delagoutte J-P, Cuny C, Mainard D, Baumann C. Total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis: mid- and long-term quality of life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:54–62.PubMedCrossRef Rat A-C, Guillemin F, Osnowycz G, Delagoutte J-P, Cuny C, Mainard D, Baumann C. Total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis: mid- and long-term quality of life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:54–62.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Slätis P, Paavolainen P. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:56–64.PubMedCrossRef Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Slätis P, Paavolainen P. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:56–64.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson J, Malchau H, Garellick G. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:157–161.PubMedCrossRef Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson J, Malchau H, Garellick G. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:157–161.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Slover J, Alvarado C, Nelson C. Shared decision making in total joint replacement. JBJS Rev. 2014;2:e1–e6.CrossRef Slover J, Alvarado C, Nelson C. Shared decision making in total joint replacement. JBJS Rev. 2014;2:e1–e6.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, Li Z, Chenok KE, Bozic KJ. Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:176–191.PubMedCrossRef SooHoo NF, Li Z, Chenok KE, Bozic KJ. Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:176–191.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, Croft P, de Vet HCW. Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:524–534.PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, Croft P, de Vet HCW. Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:524–534.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:285–295.PubMedCrossRef Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:285–295.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Wyrwich KW, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Acaster S. Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:475–483.PubMedCrossRef Wyrwich KW, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Acaster S. Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:475–483.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA
Authors
Jonathan L. Berliner, MD
Dane J. Brodke, BA
Vanessa Chan, MPH
Nelson F. SooHoo, MD
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4350-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2016 Go to the issue