Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-11-2014 | Symposium: Fractures of the Acetabulum

What Is the Frequency of Nerve Injuries Associated With Acetabular Fractures?

Authors: Wolfgang Lehmann, MD, Michael Hoffmann, MD, Florian Fensky, MD, Jakob Nüchtern, MD, Lars Großterlinden, MD, Emin Aghayev, MD, Helmar Lehmann, MD, Fabian Stuby, MD, Johannes M. Rueger, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2014

Abstract

Background

Acetabular fractures and surgical interventions used to treat them can result in nerve injuries. To date, only small case studies have tried to explore the frequency of nerve injuries and their association with patient and treatment characteristics. High-quality data on the risk of traumatic and iatrogenic nerve lesions and their epidemiology in relation to different fracture types and surgical approaches are lacking.

Questions/purposes

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the proportion of patients who develop nerve injuries after acetabular fracture; (2) which fracture type(s) are associated with increased nerve injury risk; and (3) which surgical approach was associated with the highest proportion of patients developing nerve injuries using data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry. Two secondary aims were (4) to assess hospital volume–nerve-injury relationship; and (5) internal data validity.

Methods

Between March 2001 and June 2012, 2236 patients with acetabular fractures were entered into a prospectively maintained registry from 29 hospitals; of those, 2073 (92.7%) had complete records on the endpoints of interest in this retrospective study and were analyzed. The neurological status in these patients was captured at their admission and at the discharge. A total of 1395 of 2073 (67%) patients underwent surgery, and the proportions of intervention-related and other hospital-acquired nerve injuries were obtained. Overall proportions of patients developing nerve injuries, risk based on fracture type, and risk of surgical approach type were analyzed.

Results

The proportion of patients being diagnosed with nerve injuries at hospital admission was 4% (76 of 2073) and at discharge 7% (134 or 2073). Patients with fractures of the “posterior wall” (relative risk [RR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–2.8; p = 0.001), “posterior column and posterior wall” (RR, 2.9; CI, 1.6–5.0; p = 0.002), and “transverse + posterior wall” fracture (RR, 2.1; CI, 1.3–3.5; p = 0.010) were more likely to have nerve injuries at hospital discharge. The proportion of patients with intervention-related nerve injuries and that of patients with other hospital-acquired nerve injuries was 2% (24 of 1395 and 46 of 2073, respectively). They both were associated with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (RR, 3.0; CI, 1.4–6.2; p = 0.006; and RR, 2.4; CI, 1.4–4.3; p = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusions

Acetabular fractures with the involvement of posterior wall were most commonly accompanied with nerve injuries. The data suggest also that Kocher-Langenbeck approach to the pelvic ring is associated with a higher risk of perioperative nerve injuries. Trauma surgeons should be aware of common nerve injuries, particularly in posterior wall fractures. The results of the study should help provide patients with more exact information on the risk of perioperative nerve injuries in acetabular fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AO/OTA. Pelvis. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(Suppl 10):S59–S67.

Archdeacon MT, Kazemi N, Guy P, Sagi HC. The modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:170–175.PubMed

Bradshaw C, McCrory P, Bell S, Brukner P. Obturator nerve entrapment. A cause of groin pain in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:402–408.PubMedCrossRef

Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:112–123.PubMedCrossRef

de Ridder VA, de Lange S, Kingma L, Hogervorst M. Results of 75 consecutive patients with an acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:53–57.PubMedCrossRef

Dunbar RP Jr, Gardner MJ, Cunningham B, Routt ML Jr. Sciatic nerve entrapment in associated both-column acetabular fractures: a report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:80–83.PubMedCrossRef

Fassler PR, Swiontkowski MF, Kilroy AW, Routt ML Jr. Injury of the sciatic nerve associated with acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1157–1166.PubMed

Gruson KI, Moed BR. Injury of the femoral nerve associated with acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:428–431.PubMed

Haidukewych GJ, Scaduto J, Herscovici D Jr, Sanders RW, DiPasquale T. Iatrogenic nerve injury in acetabular fracture surgery: a comparison of monitored and unmonitored procedures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:297–301.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hospodar PP, Ashman ES, Traub JA. Anatomic study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with respect to the ilioinguinal surgical dissection. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:17–19.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Issack PS, Helfet DL. Sciatic nerve injury associated with acetabular fractures. HSS J. 2009;5:12–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

12.

Keel MJ, Bastian JD, Buchler L, Siebenrock KA. [Anterior approaches to the acetabulum] [in German]. Der Unfallchirurg. 2013;116:213–220.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, Bergmann M, Bonel HM, Buchler L, Siebenrock KA, Bastian JD. The Pararectus approach for anterior intrapelvic management of acetabular fractures: an anatomical study and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:405–411.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kloen P, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R. Modification of the ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:586–593.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:81–106.PubMed

16.

Matta JM. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach: a 10-year perspective. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:S20–29.PubMed

17.

Middlebrooks ES, Sims SH, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ. Incidence of sciatic nerve injury in operatively treated acetabular fractures without somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:327–329.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Stuby FM. Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury. 2010;41:839–851.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Pohlemann T, Tosounidis G, Bircher M, Giannoudis P, Culemann U. The German Multicentre Pelvis Registry: a template for an European Expert Network? Injury. 2007;38:416–423.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sagi HC, Afsari A, Dziadosz D. The anterior intra-pelvic (modified Rives-Stoppa) approach for fixation of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:263–270.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Vrahas M, Gordon RG, Mears DC, Krieger D, Sclabassi RJ. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of pelvic and acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:50–58.PubMed

22.

Yang KH, Han DY, Park HW, Park SJ. Intraarticular entrapment of the obturator nerve in acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:361–363.PubMedCrossRef

Title: What Is the Frequency of Nerve Injuries Associated With Acetabular Fractures?
Authors: Wolfgang Lehmann, MD
Michael Hoffmann, MD
Florian Fensky, MD
Jakob Nüchtern, MD
Lars Großterlinden, MD
Emin Aghayev, MD
Helmar Lehmann, MD
Fabian Stuby, MD
Johannes M. Rueger, MD
Publication date: 01-11-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3838-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

What Is the Frequency of Nerve Injuries Associated With Acetabular Fractures?

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

The National Hospital Discharge Survey and Nationwide Inpatient Sample: The Databases Used Affect Results in THA Research

Does Implant Coating With Antibacterial-Loaded Hydrogel Reduce Bacterial Colonization and Biofilm Formation in Vitro?

What Are the Results Using the Modified Trapdoor Procedure to Treat Chondroblastoma of the Femoral Head?

Surgery for Hip Fracture Yields Societal Benefits That Exceed the Direct Medical Costs

Do Patients With Insulin-dependent and Noninsulin-dependent Diabetes Have Different Risks for Complications After Arthroplasty?

Letter to the Editor: Editorial: Transition From Training to Practice – Is There a Better Way?