Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-06-2015 | Symposium: Current Approaches to the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Does Surgical Timing Influence Functional Recovery After Lumbar Discectomy? A Systematic Review

Authors: Andrew J. Schoenfeld, MD, Christopher M. Bono, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 6/2015

Abstract

Background

The impact of the duration of preoperative symptoms on outcomes after lumbar discectomy has not been sufficiently answered in a single study but is a potentially important clinical variable.

Questions/purposes

A systematic review was performed to answer two questions: (1) Does symptomatic duration before surgery influence functional recovery after lumbar discectomy? (2) What is the time point for intervention beyond which the extent of postoperative recovery might be compromised?

Methods

The systematic review began with a query of PubMed using a structured algorithm comprised of medical subject heading terms. This was supplemented by a keyword search in PubMed along with queries of Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science and searches of reference lists as well as the tables of contents of relevant journals. Eligible studies were those that evaluated aspects of recovery after elective discectomy and stratified duration of symptoms before surgery. Included papers were abstracted by two authors and determinations regarding the period of symptom duration and its impact on outcome were recorded. Eleven studies met all inclusion criteria. No prospectively randomized trials addressed our study questions.

Results

Nine of 11 studies, four of which were prospective, maintained that longer symptom duration adversely impacted postsurgical recovery. There were substantial differences among the critical periods of symptom duration reported by individual studies, which ranged from 2 to 12 months. A preponderance of studies (five of nine) reported that surgical interventions could be performed at periods of 6 months or greater without impacting recovery.

Conclusions

Longer symptom duration had an adverse impact on results in most studies after lumbar discectomy. A possible point beyond which outcomes may be compromised is 6 months after symptom onset. Limitations in the literature surveyed, however, prevent firm conclusions.

Available only for authorised users

Akagi R, Aoki Y, Ikeda Y, Nakajima F, Ohtori S, Takahashi K, Yamagata M. Comparison of early and late surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation: is earlier better? J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:294–298.CrossRefPubMed

Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2005;30:927–935.CrossRefPubMed

Blazhevski B, Filipche V, Cvetanovski V, Simonovska N. Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. Prilozi. 2008;29:325–335.PubMed

Fisher C, Noonan V, Bishop P, Boyd M, Fairholm D, Wing P, Dvorak M. Outcome evaluation of the operative management of lumbar disc herniation causing sciatica. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(Suppl):317–324.PubMed

Gaetani P, Aimar E, Panella L, Debernardi A, Tancioni F, Rodriguez y Baena R. Surgery for herniated lumbar disc disease: factors influencing outcome measures. An analysis of 403 cases. Funct Neurol. 2004;19:43–49.

Hurme M, Alaranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine. 1987;12:933–938.CrossRefPubMed

Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;311:210–215.CrossRef

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman G, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151: 264–269.CrossRefPubMed

Ng LCL, Sell P. Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:546–549.PubMed

10.

Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Solberg T. Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. J Neurosurg. 2000;92:131–134.PubMed

11.

Nygaard OP, Romner B, Trumpy JH. Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir. 1994;128:53–56.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Peul WC, Arts MP, Brand R, Koes BW. Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:538–545.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

13.

Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Radcliff K, Kurd M, Lurie J, Blood E, Albert TJ, Weinstein JN. Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1906–1914.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Schoeggl A, Maier H, Saringer W, Reddy M, Matula C. Outcome after chronic sciatica as the only reason for lumbar microdiscectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:415–419.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Schoenfeld AJ, Weiner BK. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: evidence-based practice. Int J Gen Med. 2010;3:209–214.PubMedCentralPubMed

16.

Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Bria WF, El-Solh AA, Ernst A, Fahy BF, Gould MK, Horan KL, Krishnan JA, Manthous CA, Maurer JR, McNicholas WT, Oxman AD, Rubenfeld G, Turino GM, Guyatt G; ATS Documents Development and Implementation Committee. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:605–614.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Konishi S, Terai H, Tsujio T, Dozono S, Nakamura H. Risk factor analysis for motor deficit and delayed recovery associated with L4/5 lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:1–5.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine. 2008;33:2789–2800.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Title: Does Surgical Timing Influence Functional Recovery After Lumbar Discectomy? A Systematic Review
Authors: Andrew J. Schoenfeld, MD
Christopher M. Bono, MD
Publication date: 01-06-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3505-1

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Does Surgical Timing Influence Functional Recovery After Lumbar Discectomy? A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Modified Dunn Procedure is Superior to In Situ Pinning for Short-term Clinical and Radiographic Improvement in Severe Stable SCFE

CORR Insights®: Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Associated With a Unique Cementless Stem Design

Art In Science: The Stage of the Human Body—The Anatomical Theatre of Bologna

CORR Insights®: Is the Induced-membrane Technique Successful for Limb Reconstruction After Resecting Large Bone Tumors in Children?

Is the Induced-membrane Technique Successful for Limb Reconstruction After Resecting Large Bone Tumors in Children?

Orthopaedic Healthcare Worldwide: Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans: An Adjunct to Clinical Practice Guidelines