Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-04-2014 | Clinical Research

Are Younger Patients Undergoing TKAs Appropriately Characterized As Active?

Authors: James A. Keeney, MD, Ryan M. Nunley, MD, Rick W. Wright, MD, Robert L. Barrack, MD, John C. Clohisy, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2014

Abstract

Background

The use of TKAs in young patients is increasing. Demographic characteristics and activity levels among this patient group may affect implant selection, performance, and survivorship. Patient age (≤ 55 years) and preoperative diagnosis have been used to define this patient group, with the presumption that these patients are more active than older patients with similar indications for TKA.

Questions/purposes

We questioned whether (1) demographic features of young patients support high activity expectations after TKA, and (2) preoperative or postoperative functional activity measures support projections that young patients are active after TKA.

Methods

We retrospectively compared demographic characteristics (gender, BMI, diagnosis) and functional activity profile (as determined by preoperative and postoperative UCLA activity score and functional subscores of The Knee Society and WOMAC instruments) for 150 patients 55 years old or younger (181 TKAs) and 262 patients who were between 65 to 75 years old (314 TKAs) at the time of surgery.

Results

Younger patients having TKAs were significantly more likely than older patients to be female (74% versus 60%, p < 0.001) and to have diagnoses other than osteoarthritis (18% versus 3%, p < 0.001). BMI was significantly greater among younger female patients than among other age and gender combinations (35 kg/m² versus 31 kg/m², p < 0.001). Male patients had higher mean postoperative UCLA activity scores (5.5 versus 4.4, p < 0.001), Knee Society function subscores (80.2 versus 66.4, p < 0.001), and WOMAC function subscores (82.8 versus 74.2, p < 0.01) compared with female patients, but these were not different in older versus younger patients.

Conclusions

Sustained high activity levels are not likely to be a principal cause of revision TKAs among younger patients when considering age and diagnosis alone. Determining the effect of activity on survivorship of prosthetic designs and techniques should be based on measured functional activity instead of using age and diagnosis as surrogates for activity.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228–241.PubMed

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMed

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 45–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Clohisy JC, Kamath GV, Byrd GD, Steger-May K, Wright RW. Patient compliance with clinical follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1848–1854.PubMedCrossRef

Crowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 suppl 3):12–16.PubMedCrossRef

Dalury DF, Ewald FC, Christie MJ, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty in a group of patients less than 45 years of age. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:598–602.PubMedCrossRef

Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:575–582.PubMed

Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:153–158.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:66–72.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Duffy GP, Crowder AR, Trousdale RR, Berry DJ. Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 suppl 2):67–70.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.PubMed

12.

Gill GS, Chan KC, Mills DM. 5- to 18-year follow-up study of cemented total knee arthroplasty for patients 55 years old or younger. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:49–54.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:83–87.PubMed

14.

Harrysson OL, Robertsson O, Nayfeh JF. Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:162–168.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, Hamalainen M, Lehto MU. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis: Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8,467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:85–88.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV. Cementless total knee replacement in patients 50 years old and under. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:131–145.PubMed

17.

Jamsen E, Nevalainen P, Eskelinen A, Huotari K, Kalliovalkama J, Moilanen T. Obesity, diabetes, and preoperative hyperglycemia as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center analysis of 7181 primary hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e101 1–9.

18.

Hofmann AA, Heithoff SM, Camargo M. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:102–107.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, Wright RW, Clohisy JC. What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:574–583.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

20.

Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, Kim TK; The Kleos Korea Research Group. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug 28. [Epub ahead of print].

21.

Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–2612.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

22.

Lonner JH, Hershman S, Mont M, Lotke PA. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years of age and younger with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:85–90.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Malinzak RA, Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Olberding EM, Davis KE. Morbidly obese, diabetic, younger, and unilateral joint arthroplasty patients have elevated total joint arthroplasty infection rates. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:84–88.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Mont MA, Sayeed SA, Osuji O, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Delanois RE, Bonutti PM. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years and younger. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:65–69.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Odland AN, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Wells CW. Wear and lysis is the problem in modular TKA in the young OA patient at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:41–47.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

26.

Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1968–1973.PubMed

27.

Ranawat CS, Padgett DE, Ohashi Y. Total knee arthroplasty for patients younger than 55 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:27–33.PubMed

28.

Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:259–265.PubMed

29.

Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1588–1596.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Faris PM, Berend ME. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger: osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee. 2007;14:9–11.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Stern SH, Bowen MK, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Cemented total knee arthroplasty for gonarthrosis in patients 55 years old or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:124–129.PubMed

33.

Stuart MJ, Rand JA. Total knee arthroplasty in young adults who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:84–87.PubMed

34.

Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1158–1163.PubMedCrossRef

35.

W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients Acta Orthop. 2010;81:161–164.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

36.

World Health Organization, Division of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Programme of Nutrition, Family and Reproductive Health. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva, Switzerland; 1998:29. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63854. Accessed October 30, 2013.

Title: Are Younger Patients Undergoing TKAs Appropriately Characterized As Active?
Authors: James A. Keeney, MD
Ryan M. Nunley, MD
Rick W. Wright, MD
Robert L. Barrack, MD
John C. Clohisy, MD
Publication date: 01-04-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3376-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Are Younger Patients Undergoing TKAs Appropriately Characterized As Active?

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

In Vivo Kinematics of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint During Three Isometric Functional Tasks

Lateral Ankle Stabilization After Distal Fibular Resection Using a Novel Approach: A Surgical Technique

Obesity Increases Length of Stay and Direct Medical Costs in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Trust in Science

Obituary: Alexander Garcia MD (1919–2012)

Ultrastructure and Innervation of Thumb Carpometacarpal Ligaments in Surgical Patients With Osteoarthritis