Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Clinical Research

Assessing Shoulder Motion in Children: Age Limitations to Mallet and ABC Loops

Authors: Michael L. Pearl, MD, Fabian van de Bunt, BS, Michaela Pearl, BS, Nina Lightdale-Miric, MD, Susan Rethlefsen, PT, DPT, Jennifer Loiselle, OTRL

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shoulder ROM and function of the shoulder are difficult to evaluate in young children. There has been no determination of the age at which children can comply with the current assessment tools in use, but doing so would be important, because it gives us more accurate insight into the development and assessment of shoulder functional ROM in young children.

Questions/purposes

We (1) determined whether age would limit the use of two different observational scales used to assess shoulder ROM and function in young children (the Mallet scale and the ABC Loops protocol); and (2) compared the two scales in terms of intra- and interobserver reliabilities.

Methods

Sixty-five able-bodied children (32 boys, 33 girls; mean age, 3.9 years; range, 0.5–7.0 years) were recruited from local preschools and evaluated using the Mallet scale and ABC Loops protocol. Children were assessed on their ability to complete the examinations and time to completion for each measurement protocol. Intra- and interobserver reliability was tested by percentage agreement. Forty-eight children (mean age, 4.4 years; SD, 1.3 years) were able to complete the Mallet and ABC Loops measurement protocols; 17 children (mean age, 2.3 years; SD, 1.1 years) failed to complete either test.

Results

Younger children had more difficulty completing the examinations; there was a strong negative correlation between age and failure: probability of failure increased with decreasing age (Pearson r = −0.601, p < 0.001). Children who were able to complete one test were able to complete the other. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was very high for both scales (in excess of 95% for all comparisons), and with the numbers available, there were no differences between the scales.

Conclusions

The Mallet scale and ABC Loops protocol have high reliability metrics in children younger than 6 years, but very young children (those younger than 3 years) generally will not be able to complete the examinations. The ABC Loops test took longer to perform than the Mallet scale but may more comprehensively evaluate a child’s functional capabilities. We therefore state that both assessment tools can be reliably used in children older than 3 years; we believe the ABC Loops gives a more accurate assessment of shoulder ROM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bae DS, Waters PM, Zurakowski D. Reliability of three classification systems measuring active motion in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1733–1738.PubMed Bae DS, Waters PM, Zurakowski D. Reliability of three classification systems measuring active motion in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1733–1738.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bialocerkowski AE, Galea M. Comparison of visual and objective quantification of elbow and shoulder movement in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2006;1:5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bialocerkowski AE, Galea M. Comparison of visual and objective quantification of elbow and shoulder movement in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2006;1:5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Curtis C, Stephens D, Clarke HM, Andrews D. The active movement scale: an evaluative tool for infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:470–478.PubMedCrossRef Curtis C, Stephens D, Clarke HM, Andrews D. The active movement scale: an evaluative tool for infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:470–478.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hoeksma AF, Wolf H, Oei SL. Obstetrical brachial plexus injuries: incidence, natural course and shoulder contracture. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:523–526.PubMedCrossRef Hoeksma AF, Wolf H, Oei SL. Obstetrical brachial plexus injuries: incidence, natural course and shoulder contracture. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:523–526.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kon DS, Darakjian AB, Pearl ML, Kosco AE. Glenohumeral deformity in children with internal rotation contractures secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy: intraoperative arthrographic classification. Radiology. 2004;231:791–795.PubMedCrossRef Kon DS, Darakjian AB, Pearl ML, Kosco AE. Glenohumeral deformity in children with internal rotation contractures secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy: intraoperative arthrographic classification. Radiology. 2004;231:791–795.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mallet J. [Obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus. 3. Conclusions] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1972;58(suppl):166–168.PubMed Mallet J. [Obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus. 3. Conclusions] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1972;58(suppl):166–168.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mehlman CT, DeVoe WB, Lippert WC, Michaud LJ, Allgier AJ, Foad SL. Arthroscopically assisted Sever-L’Episcopo procedure improves clinical and radiographic outcomes in neonatal brachial plexus palsy patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:341–351.PubMedCrossRef Mehlman CT, DeVoe WB, Lippert WC, Michaud LJ, Allgier AJ, Foad SL. Arthroscopically assisted Sever-L’Episcopo procedure improves clinical and radiographic outcomes in neonatal brachial plexus palsy patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:341–351.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Michelow BJ, Clarke HM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM, Seifu Y, Andrews DF. The natural history of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:675–681.PubMedCrossRef Michelow BJ, Clarke HM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM, Seifu Y, Andrews DF. The natural history of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:675–681.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mosqueda T, James MA, Petuskey K, Bagley A, Abdala E, Rab G. Kinematic assessment of the upper extremity in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:695–699.PubMedCrossRef Mosqueda T, James MA, Petuskey K, Bagley A, Abdala E, Rab G. Kinematic assessment of the upper extremity in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:695–699.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pearl ML. Shoulder problems in children with brachial plexus birth palsy: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:242–254.PubMed Pearl ML. Shoulder problems in children with brachial plexus birth palsy: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:242–254.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pearl ML, Edgerton BW, Kazimiroff PA, Burchette RJ, Wong K. Arthroscopic release and latissimus dorsi transfer for shoulder internal rotation contractures and glenohumeral deformity secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:564–574.PubMedCrossRef Pearl ML, Edgerton BW, Kazimiroff PA, Burchette RJ, Wong K. Arthroscopic release and latissimus dorsi transfer for shoulder internal rotation contractures and glenohumeral deformity secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:564–574.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Richards RR, Bigliani LU, Gartsman GM, Ianotti JP, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:347–352.PubMedCrossRef Richards RR, Bigliani LU, Gartsman GM, Ianotti JP, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:347–352.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sibinski M, Hems TE, Sherlock DA. Management strategies for shoulder reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus injury with special reference to loss of internal rotation after surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37:772–779.PubMedCrossRef Sibinski M, Hems TE, Sherlock DA. Management strategies for shoulder reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus injury with special reference to loss of internal rotation after surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37:772–779.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference van der Sluijs JA, van Doorn-Loogman MH, Ritt MJ, Wuisman PI. Interobserver reliability of the Mallet score. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:324–327.PubMedCrossRef van der Sluijs JA, van Doorn-Loogman MH, Ritt MJ, Wuisman PI. Interobserver reliability of the Mallet score. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:324–327.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference van Gelein Vitringa VM, van Kooten EO, Jaspers RT, Mullender MG, van Doorn-Loogman MH, van der Sluijs JA. An MRI study on the relations between muscle atrophy, shoulder function and glenohumeral deformity in shoulders of children with obstetric brachial plexus injury. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2009;4:9. van Gelein Vitringa VM, van Kooten EO, Jaspers RT, Mullender MG, van Doorn-Loogman MH, van der Sluijs JA. An MRI study on the relations between muscle atrophy, shoulder function and glenohumeral deformity in shoulders of children with obstetric brachial plexus injury. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2009;4:9.
16.
go back to reference Waters PM, Bae DS. Effect of tendon transfers and extra-articular soft-tissue balancing on glenohumeral development in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:320–325.PubMedCrossRef Waters PM, Bae DS. Effect of tendon transfers and extra-articular soft-tissue balancing on glenohumeral development in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:320–325.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing Shoulder Motion in Children: Age Limitations to Mallet and ABC Loops
Authors
Michael L. Pearl, MD
Fabian van de Bunt, BS
Michaela Pearl, BS
Nina Lightdale-Miric, MD
Susan Rethlefsen, PT, DPT
Jennifer Loiselle, OTRL
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3324-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2014 Go to the issue