Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Symposium: Evolving Medicolegal Concepts

Medical Liability of the Physician in Training

Authors: Brian Wegman, MD, James P. Stannard, MD, B. Sonny Bal, MD, JD, MBA

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lawsuits alleging medical negligence by postgraduate physicians in training (residents) arise from treatment received by aggrieved patients at teaching hospitals. A threshold question in determining liability is whether or not the standard of care has been violated. Courts have questioned whether the proper standard governing resident physician conduct should be that of a reasonably competent generalist physician, that of a specialty physician, or whether the standard should be some subjective determination that addresses the resident level of training.

Questions/purposes

We examined legal cases in which the standard of care for a physician in training has been questioned. Additionally, we address how resident conduct can extend liability to supervising physicians and employer hospitals.

Methods

Westlaw™ and LexisNexis®, two major legal databases used by law professionals, were searched to identify existing case law and law review articles related to the standard of care that applies to physicians in training. Of 57 sources initially identified, 15 legal cases and 10 law review papers addressed the standard of care pertaining to physicians in training. These selected cases and papers form the basis of the present article.

Results

The standard by which the professional conduct of a physician in training is measured has varied; most recent legal cases have applied a specialty physician standard. Relevant court rulings have tried to strike a balance between patient interests versus the societal need to train physicians.

Conclusions

Physician representation, nature of conduct, and extent of supervision of that conduct are relevant factors used by courts to determine liability. However, the recent standards are those of the physician who directly supervises the professional conduct of a resident in a given situation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centman v Cobb, 581 NE2d 1286 (Ind Ct App 1991). Centman v Cobb, 581 NE2d 1286 (Ind Ct App 1991).
2.
go back to reference Felice v Valley Lab Inc, 520 So 2d 920 (La Ct App 1988). Felice v Valley Lab Inc, 520 So 2d 920 (La Ct App 1988).
3.
go back to reference Gonzalez v St John Hospital & Medical Center, 739 NW2d 392 (Mich Ct App 2007). Gonzalez v St John Hospital & Medical Center, 739 NW2d 392 (Mich Ct App 2007).
4.
go back to reference Helms LB, Helms CM. Forty years of litigation involving residents and their training: II. Malpractice issues. Acad Med. 1991;66:718–725. Helms LB, Helms CM. Forty years of litigation involving residents and their training: II. Malpractice issues. Acad Med. 1991;66:718–725.
5.
go back to reference Jenkins v Clark, 454 NE2d 541; Ohio Ct App (1982). Jenkins v Clark, 454 NE2d 541; Ohio Ct App (1982).
6.
go back to reference Jistarri v Nappi, 549 A2d 210 (Pa Super Ct 1988). Jistarri v Nappi, 549 A2d 210 (Pa Super Ct 1988).
7.
go back to reference Johnson v Kokemoor, 545 NW2d 495 (Wis 1996). Johnson v Kokemoor, 545 NW2d 495 (Wis 1996).
8.
go back to reference Kachalia A, Studdert DM. Professional liability issues in graduate medical education. JAMA. 2004;292:1051–1052.PubMedCrossRef Kachalia A, Studdert DM. Professional liability issues in graduate medical education. JAMA. 2004;292:1051–1052.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference King JH. Causation, valuation, and chance in personal injury torts involving preexisting conditions and future consequences. Yale Law J. 1981;90:1353.CrossRef King JH. Causation, valuation, and chance in personal injury torts involving preexisting conditions and future consequences. Yale Law J. 1981;90:1353.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference King JH. Reconciling the exercise of judgment and the objective standard of care in medical malpractice. Okla Law Rev. 1999;52:49. King JH. Reconciling the exercise of judgment and the objective standard of care in medical malpractice. Okla Law Rev. 1999;52:49.
11.
go back to reference King JH. The standard of care for residents and other medical school graduates in training. Am U L Rev. 2005;55:683. King JH. The standard of care for residents and other medical school graduates in training. Am U L Rev. 2005;55:683.
12.
go back to reference Lownsbury v Van Buren, 762 NE2d 354 (Ohio 2001). Lownsbury v Van Buren, 762 NE2d 354 (Ohio 2001).
13.
go back to reference McBride v United States, 462 F2d 72, 74 (9th Cir 1972). McBride v United States, 462 F2d 72, 74 (9th Cir 1972).
14.
go back to reference Meisel A, Kabnick LD. Informed consent to medical treatment: an analysis of recent legislation. U Pitt Law Rev. 1980;41:438–439. Meisel A, Kabnick LD. Informed consent to medical treatment: an analysis of recent legislation. U Pitt Law Rev. 1980;41:438–439.
15.
go back to reference Mercil v Mathers; No C3-93-140, 1994 WL 1114 (Minn Ct App Jan 4, 1994), rev’d on other grounds, 517 NW2d 328 (Minn 1994). Mercil v Mathers; No C3-93-140, 1994 WL 1114 (Minn Ct App Jan 4, 1994), rev’d on other grounds, 517 NW2d 328 (Minn 1994).
16.
go back to reference National Bank of Commerce v Quirk; 918 SW2d 138 (Ark 1996). National Bank of Commerce v Quirk; 918 SW2d 138 (Ark 1996).
17.
go back to reference Phelps v Physicians Ins Co of Wis, 681 NW2d 571, 582 (Wisc Ct App 2004), rev’d on other grounds, 698 NW2d 643. Phelps v Physicians Ins Co of Wis, 681 NW2d 571, 582 (Wisc Ct App 2004), rev’d on other grounds, 698 NW2d 643.
18.
go back to reference Powers v United States, 589 F Supp 1084, 1099–1101 (D Conn 1984). Powers v United States, 589 F Supp 1084, 1099–1101 (D Conn 1984).
19.
go back to reference Pratt v Stein, 444 A2d 674 (Pa Super Ct 1982). Pratt v Stein, 444 A2d 674 (Pa Super Ct 1982).
20.
go back to reference Reuter SR. Professional liability in postgraduate medical education. Who is liable for resident negligence? J Leg Med. 1994;15:485–531.PubMedCrossRef Reuter SR. Professional liability in postgraduate medical education. Who is liable for resident negligence? J Leg Med. 1994;15:485–531.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rodriguez RM, Anglin D, Hankin A, Hayden SR, Phelps M, McCollough L, Hendey GW. A longitudinal study of emergency medicine residents’ malpractice fear and defensive medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:569–573.PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez RM, Anglin D, Hankin A, Hayden SR, Phelps M, McCollough L, Hendey GW. A longitudinal study of emergency medicine residents’ malpractice fear and defensive medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:569–573.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rush v Akron General Hospital 171 NE2d 378, 381 (Ohio Ct App 1957). Rush v Akron General Hospital 171 NE2d 378, 381 (Ohio Ct App 1957).
23.
go back to reference Schleiter KE. When are residents treated as doctors under the law? Virtual Mentor. 2009;11:882. Schleiter KE. When are residents treated as doctors under the law? Virtual Mentor. 2009;11:882.
24.
go back to reference Twerski AD, Cohen NB. The Second Revolution in Informed Consent: Comparing Physicians to Each Other, 94 Nw U L Rev 1, 9 (1999). Twerski AD, Cohen NB. The Second Revolution in Informed Consent: Comparing Physicians to Each Other, 94 Nw U L Rev 1, 9 (1999).
25.
go back to reference Whiteside v Lukson, 947 P2d 1263, 1265 (Wash Ct App 1997). Whiteside v Lukson, 947 P2d 1263, 1265 (Wash Ct App 1997).
Metadata
Title
Medical Liability of the Physician in Training
Authors
Brian Wegman, MD
James P. Stannard, MD
B. Sonny Bal, MD, JD, MBA
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2244-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2012 Go to the issue

Symposium: Current Approaches in Cerebral Palsy, A Focus On Gait Problems

Case Reports: The Influence of Selective Voluntary Motor Control on Gait After Hamstring Lengthening Surgery

Symposium: Current Approaches in Cerebral Palsy, A Focus on Gait Problems

Better Walking Performance in Older Children With Cerebral Palsy

Symposium: Current Approaches in Cerebral Palsy, A Focus on Gait Problems

Current Approaches in Cerebral Palsy, A Focus on Gait Problems: Editorial Comment