Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Symposium: Update on Hard-on-Hard Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Resurfacing: Surgical Technique and Complications

Authors: Stefan Kreuzer, MD, Kevin Leffers, BS, Suneel Kumar, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a technically difficult approach but theoretically reduces the soft tissue trauma to the hip because it does not require muscle detachments from the bone. Furthermore, the patient is in the supine position facilitating fluoroscopy to control component placement. However, the complications associated with the learning curve and functional outcome scores are not well defined in the literature.

Questions/purposes

We therefore asked how our first 57 operations using the anterior approach and special table extension compared with that in the literature with regard to (1) complication rate; (2) functional outcome scores; (3) component placement; and (4) length of stay.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent 57 hip resurfacing procedures using a DAA. There were 45 men and six women with an average age of 51 years (range, 31–63 years) and a body mass index of 28.7 kg/m2 (range, 19.7–42.0 kg/m2). The minimum followup was 0.3 months (mean, 8.7 months; range, 0.3–24.9 months).

Results

There were three atraumatic (5%) and one posttraumatic (1.8%) femoral neck fractures. Average HOOS scores were equal to or better than averages reported for total hip arthroplasty. Average cup inclination was 36.5° (range, 25°–48°). The average length of stay was 2.11 days (range, 1–4 days).

Conclusions

The surgical approach for anterior hip resurfacing is technically difficult but may have some clinical benefits. Surgeons interested in using the DAA for hip resurfacing should be very familiar with the DAA for total hip arthroplasty and with hip resurfacing.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28–39.PubMed Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28–39.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Campbell P, Lu Z, Leunig-Ganz K, Beck M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):85–96.PubMedCrossRef Beaule PE, Campbell P, Lu Z, Leunig-Ganz K, Beck M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):85–96.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:87–93.PubMedCrossRef Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:87–93.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Benoit B, Gofton W, Beaule PE. Hueter anterior approach for hip resurfacing: assessment of the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:357–363.PubMedCrossRef Benoit B, Gofton W, Beaule PE. Hueter anterior approach for hip resurfacing: assessment of the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:357–363.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:248–255.PubMedCrossRef Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:248–255.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gross TP, Liu F. Minimally invasive posterior approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2010;25:39–49.CrossRef Gross TP, Liu F. Minimally invasive posterior approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2010;25:39–49.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1987. Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.
8.
go back to reference Kreuzer SW, Matta J. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen approach. Monogram of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007:1–14. Kreuzer SW, Matta J. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen approach. Monogram of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007:1–14.
9.
go back to reference Lachiewicz PF. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic’s view. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:86–91.PubMed Lachiewicz PF. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic’s view. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:86–91.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Le Duff MJ, Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Range of Motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Joint Dis. 2009;67:177–181. Le Duff MJ, Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Range of Motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Joint Dis. 2009;67:177–181.
11.
go back to reference Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1550–1554.PubMedCrossRef Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1550–1554.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:66–71.PubMedCrossRef Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:66–71.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53.PubMedCrossRef Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115–124.PubMedCrossRef Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115–124.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McMinn DJW, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Posterior surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2010;25:73–79.CrossRef McMinn DJW, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Posterior surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2010;25:73–79.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–298.PubMedCrossRef Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–298.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:66–71.PubMedCrossRef Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:66–71.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Beaule PE, Boyd HS, Grecula MJ, Goldberg VM, Kennedy WR, Marker DR, Schmalzried TP, Sparling EA, Vail TP, Amstutz HC. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:63–70.PubMed Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Beaule PE, Boyd HS, Grecula MJ, Goldberg VM, Kennedy WR, Marker DR, Schmalzried TP, Sparling EA, Vail TP, Amstutz HC. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:63–70.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger U, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:705–711.PubMedCrossRef Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger U, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:705–711.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:698–704.PubMedCrossRef Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:698–704.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.PubMedCrossRef Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sandri A, Regis D, Magnan B, Luminari E, Bartolozzi P. Hip resurfacing using the anterolateral Watson-Jones approach in the supine position. Orthopedics. 2009;32:406.PubMedCrossRef Sandri A, Regis D, Magnan B, Luminari E, Bartolozzi P. Hip resurfacing using the anterolateral Watson-Jones approach in the supine position. Orthopedics. 2009;32:406.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:463–464.PubMedCrossRef Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:463–464.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Steffen RT, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS. A modified posterior approach preserves femoral head oxgenation during hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print]. Steffen RT, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS. A modified posterior approach preserves femoral head oxgenation during hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print].
25.
go back to reference Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167–170. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167–170.
Metadata
Title
Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Resurfacing: Surgical Technique and Complications
Authors
Stefan Kreuzer, MD
Kevin Leffers, BS
Suneel Kumar, MD
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1698-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Update on Hard-on-Hard Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty

Update on Hard-on-hard Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty: Editorial Comment