Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011

01-04-2011 | Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Durable Infection Control and Function With the PROSTALAC Spacer in Two-stage Revision for Infected Knee Arthroplasty

Authors: Christopher R. Gooding, BSc, MD, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Bassam A. Masri, MD, FRCSC, Clive P. Duncan, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Nelson V. Greidanus, MD, MPH, FRCSC, Donald S. Garbuz, MD, MHSc, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty is recognized as the gold standard in the treatment of infection. However, traditional spacers limit function in the interval between the two stages and may cause instability, scarring, and bone erosion. The PROSTALAC knee spacer is an antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer that allows some movement of the knee between stages. Whether motion enhances long-term function is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We therefore identify the rate of control of infection using the PROSTALAC exchange spacer and to assess the clinical outcome after implantation with a definitive implant.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 115 knees that underwent two-stage exchange with the PROSTALAC spacer. Forty-eight of these had a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 9 years; range, 5–12 years).

Results

At last review, 101 of the 115 knees (88%) had no evidence of infection. Of the 14 knees that became reinfected, four were from the same organism and 10 were with a different organism. After further intervention, using the two-stage approach again, the infection was controlled in 12 of the 14 initially reinfected cases, resulting in a failure to cure in only two cases. We observed improvements in mean WOMAC, Oxford, UCLA, and Patient Satisfaction scores at last review.

Conclusions

The PROSTALAC functional spacer was associated with a 98% rate of control of infection and improvements in the quality-of-life outcomes in the treatment of chronically infected total knee arthroplasties.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bengtson S, Knutson K. The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:301–311.PubMedCrossRef Bengtson S, Knutson K. The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:301–311.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bengtson S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of infected knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57:489–494.PubMedCrossRef Bengtson S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of infected knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57:489–494.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Booth RE, Lotke PA. The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:57–60.PubMed Booth RE, Lotke PA. The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:57–60.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Borden LS, Gearen PF. Infected total knee arthroplasty. A protocol for management. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:27–36.PubMedCrossRef Borden LS, Gearen PF. Infected total knee arthroplasty. A protocol for management. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:27–36.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brause BD. Infected total knee replacement: diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic considerations. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982;13:245–249.PubMed Brause BD. Infected total knee replacement: diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic considerations. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982;13:245–249.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL. Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:148–154.PubMedCrossRef Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL. Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:148–154.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76.PubMed Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Deburge A, Guepar. Guepar hinge prosthesis: complications and results with two years’ follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:47–53.PubMed Deburge A, Guepar. Guepar hinge prosthesis: complications and results with two years’ follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:47–53.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, Masri BA, McGraw RW, Paris NJ, Breault MJ. The antibiotic loaded joint replacement system. A novel approach to the management of the infected knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:296. Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, Masri BA, McGraw RW, Paris NJ, Breault MJ. The antibiotic loaded joint replacement system. A novel approach to the management of the infected knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:296.
10.
go back to reference Emerson RH, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL. Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:132–138.PubMedCrossRef Emerson RH, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL. Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:132–138.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:9–16.PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;380:9–16.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gill GS, Joshi AB. Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:209–214.PubMed Gill GS, Joshi AB. Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:209–214.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:118–124.PubMedCrossRef Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:118–124.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Wilson SD, McAlinden MG, Xu M, Duncan CP. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1409–1416.PubMedCrossRef Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Wilson SD, McAlinden MG, Xu M, Duncan CP. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1409–1416.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP, Duncan CP. The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:807–812.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP, Duncan CP. The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:807–812.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Insall JN. Infection of total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:319–324.PubMed Insall JN. Infection of total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:319–324.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Insall JN. Surgical technique and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P, eds. Surgery of the Knee. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:739–804. Insall JN. Surgical technique and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P, eds. Surgery of the Knee. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:739–804.
18.
go back to reference Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1087–1098.PubMed Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1087–1098.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:490.PubMed Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:490.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW. Revision of septic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:159–166.PubMed Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW. Revision of septic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:159–166.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kelly MA, Clarke HD. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:51–57.PubMedCrossRef Kelly MA, Clarke HD. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:51–57.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Konig A, Kirschner S. Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty [in German]. Orthopade. 2003;32:516–526.PubMed Konig A, Kirschner S. Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty [in German]. Orthopade. 2003;32:516–526.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Meek RM, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, McGraw RW, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:874–879.PubMedCrossRef Meek RM, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, McGraw RW, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:874–879.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP. Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1888–1892.PubMedCrossRef Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP. Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1888–1892.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94–102.PubMed Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94–102.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Rand JA, Chao EY, Stauffer RN. Kinematic rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:489–497.PubMed Rand JA, Chao EY, Stauffer RN. Kinematic rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:489–497.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:201–210.PubMed Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:201–210.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Rorabeck CH. Session IV: salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Infection: the problem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:113–115.PubMedCrossRef Rorabeck CH. Session IV: salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Infection: the problem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:113–115.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rosenberg AG, Haas B, Barden R, Marquez D, Landon GC, Galante JO. Salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:29–33.PubMed Rosenberg AG, Haas B, Barden R, Marquez D, Landon GC, Galante JO. Salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:29–33.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–284.CrossRef Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–284.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Spangehl MJ, Hanssen AD. Management of the infected total knee replacement. Curr Opin Orthop. 2002;13:23–29.CrossRef Spangehl MJ, Hanssen AD. Management of the infected total knee replacement. Curr Opin Orthop. 2002;13:23–29.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and débridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:35–39.PubMedCrossRef Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and débridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:35–39.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Walker RH, Schurman DJ. Management of infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:81–89.PubMed Walker RH, Schurman DJ. Management of infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:81–89.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Whiteside LA. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:169–172.PubMed Whiteside LA. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:169–172.PubMed
35.
36.
go back to reference Wilde AH, Ruth JT. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:23–35.PubMed Wilde AH, Ruth JT. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:23–35.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS. Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:878–883.PubMed Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS. Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:878–883.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urs WK, Miller DV, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:272–278.PubMed Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urs WK, Miller DV, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:272–278.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Woods GW, Lionberger DR, Tullos HS. Failed total knee arthroplasty. Revision and arthrodesis for infection and noninfectious complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:184–190.PubMed Woods GW, Lionberger DR, Tullos HS. Failed total knee arthroplasty. Revision and arthrodesis for infection and noninfectious complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:184–190.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Durable Infection Control and Function With the PROSTALAC Spacer in Two-stage Revision for Infected Knee Arthroplasty
Authors
Christopher R. Gooding, BSc, MD, FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Bassam A. Masri, MD, FRCSC
Clive P. Duncan, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Nelson V. Greidanus, MD, MPH, FRCSC
Donald S. Garbuz, MD, MHSc, FRCSC
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1579-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Controversies in Orthopaedics

Is a Silastic Radial Head Still a Reasonable Option?