Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

The John Insall Award: Both Morphotype and Gender Influence the Shape of the Knee in Patients Undergoing TKA

Authors: Johan Bellemans, MD, PhD, Karel Carpentier, MD, Hilde Vandenneucker, MD, Johan Vanlauwe, MD, Jan Victor, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate whether gender differences in the dimensions of the knee should influence the design of TKA components. We hypothesized that not only gender but also the patient’s morphotype determined the shape of the distal femur and proximal tibia and that this factor should be taken into account when designing gender-specific TKA implants. We reviewed all 1000 European white patients undergoing TKA between April 2003 and June 2007 and stratified each into one of three groups based on their anatomic constitution: endomorph, ectomorph, or mesomorph. Of the 250 smallest knees, 98% were female, whereas 81% of the 250 largest knees were male. In the group with intermediate-sized knees, female knees were narrower than male knees. Patients with smaller knees (predominantly female) demonstrated large variability between narrow and wide mediolateral dimensions irrespective of gender. The same was true for larger knees (predominantly male). This variability within gender could partially be explained by morphotypic variation. Patients with short and wide morphotype (endomorph) had, irrespective of gender, wider knees, whereas patients with long and narrow morphotype (ectomorph) had narrower knees. The shape of the knee is therefore not only dependent on gender, but also on the morphotype of the patient.
Level of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference? Orthopedics. 2006;29:S53–S55.PubMed Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference? Orthopedics. 2006;29:S53–S55.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Battista RA, Pivarnik JM, Dummer GM, Sauer N, Malina RM. Comparison of physical characteristics and performances among female college rowers. J Sport Sci. 2007;25:651–657.CrossRef Battista RA, Pivarnik JM, Dummer GM, Sauer N, Malina RM. Comparison of physical characteristics and performances among female college rowers. J Sport Sci. 2007;25:651–657.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bindelglass DF, Dorr LD. Current concepts review: symmetry versus asymmetry in the design of total knee femoral components—an unresolved controversy. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:939–944.CrossRefPubMed Bindelglass DF, Dorr LD. Current concepts review: symmetry versus asymmetry in the design of total knee femoral components—an unresolved controversy. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:939–944.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bulbulian R. The influence of somatotype on anthropometric prediction of body composition in young women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:389–397.PubMed Bulbulian R. The influence of somatotype on anthropometric prediction of body composition in young women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:389–397.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M. Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:329–333.PubMed Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M. Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:329–333.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:213–217.PubMed Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:213–217.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:S31–S36.PubMed Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:S31–S36.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:63–67. Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:63–67.
9.
go back to reference Greene K. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(Suppl. 3):27–31.CrossRefPubMed Greene K. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(Suppl. 3):27–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:354–359.CrossRefPubMed Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:354–359.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Badley EM. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1016–1022.CrossRefPubMed Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Badley EM. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1016–1022.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
14.
go back to reference Hitt K, Shurman JR, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman M, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 4):115–122.PubMed Hitt K, Shurman JR, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman M, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 4):115–122.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee. 2006;13:12–14.CrossRefPubMed Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee. 2006;13:12–14.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kawashima K, Kat K, Miyazaki M. Body size and somatotype characteristics of male golfers in Japan. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003;43:334–341.PubMed Kawashima K, Kat K, Miyazaki M. Body size and somatotype characteristics of male golfers in Japan. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003;43:334–341.PubMed
17.
go back to reference MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RD, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The John Insall Award: Gender-specific total knee replacement. Prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2612–2616.CrossRefPubMed MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RD, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The John Insall Award: Gender-specific total knee replacement. Prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2612–2616.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Fatah EE, Booth R, Argenson JN. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2007;10:447–456.CrossRefPubMed Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Fatah EE, Booth R, Argenson JN. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2007;10:447–456.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M, Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA. The female knee. Anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:3059–3065.CrossRefPubMed Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M, Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA. The female knee. Anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:3059–3065.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Karabacakoglu A, Seker M, Ziylan T. Distal femoral morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27:108–112.CrossRefPubMed Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Karabacakoglu A, Seker M, Ziylan T. Distal femoral morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27:108–112.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35–46.CrossRefPubMed Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35–46.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sheldon WH. The somatotype, the morphophenotype, and the morphogenotype. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1950;15:373–382.PubMed Sheldon WH. The somatotype, the morphophenotype, and the morphogenotype. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1950;15:373–382.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Slaughter MH, Lohman TG. Relationship of body composition to somatotype. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976;44:237–244.CrossRefPubMed Slaughter MH, Lohman TG. Relationship of body composition to somatotype. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976;44:237–244.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The John Insall Award: Both Morphotype and Gender Influence the Shape of the Knee in Patients Undergoing TKA
Authors
Johan Bellemans, MD, PhD
Karel Carpentier, MD
Hilde Vandenneucker, MD
Johan Vanlauwe, MD
Jan Victor, MD
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1016-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2010 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

The Classic: Symposium on Arthroplasty: Arthroplasty: Experimental and Clinical Methods

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Aseptic and Septic Causes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Biographical Sketch: Nathaniel Allison, 1876–1932