Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

TKA Sagittal Alignment with Navigation Systems and Conventional Techniques Vary Only a Few Degrees

Authors: Yukihide Minoda, MD, PhD, Akio Kobayashi, MD, PhD, Hiroyoshi Iwaki, MD, PhD, Hirotsugu Ohashi, MD, PhD, Kunio Takaoka, MD, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Navigation systems have been developed to achieve more reliable prosthetic alignment in TKAs. However, the component alignment in the sagittal plane is reportedly less reliable than in the coronal plane even with navigation systems. We measured and compared sagittal prosthetic alignments for TKAs with the conventional technique and three navigation approaches to establish reference frames, using radiographs of the entire lower extremity while standing. The sagittal alignments simulated on the radiographs with the conventional technique and navigation systems differed by a mean of 2° to 4°. Use of navigation systems resulted in a mean of 1° to 4° hyperextension between the femoral and tibial components and use of the conventional technique resulted in a mean of 1° flexion. Use of different reference points on the distal femoral condyle for the navigation systems resulted in differences of as much as 3° alignment in the sagittal plane. Although optimal prosthetic alignment for TKA in the sagittal plane is unknown, surgeons and technicians using navigation systems should be aware of this difference in the sagittal plane and the risk of hyperextension between the femoral and tibial components, which might be associated with osteolysis and anterior post-cam impingement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40–47.PubMed Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40–47.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, Goetz DD, Schmalzried TP, Campbell PA, Johnston RC. Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:83–88.PubMedCrossRef Callaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, Goetz DD, Schmalzried TP, Campbell PA, Johnston RC. Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:83–88.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:818–823.PubMedCrossRef Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:818–823.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2702–2708.PubMedCrossRef Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2702–2708.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Egol KA, Chang EY, Cvitkovic J, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:410–415.PubMedCrossRef Egol KA, Chang EY, Cvitkovic J, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:410–415.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709–714.PubMed Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709–714.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:471–476.PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:471–476.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:536–541.PubMedCrossRef Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:536–541.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:889–896.PubMedCrossRef Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:889–896.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–243.PubMedCrossRef Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–243.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Sugama R, Iwakiri K, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K. Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:435–442.PubMedCrossRef Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Sugama R, Iwakiri K, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K. Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:435–442.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:419–426.PubMedCrossRef Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:419–426.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:620–628.PubMedCrossRef Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:620–628.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830–835.PubMed Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830–835.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:177–184.PubMedCrossRef Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:177–184.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:551–556.PubMed Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:551–556.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31–43.PubMed Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31–43.PubMed
Metadata
Title
TKA Sagittal Alignment with Navigation Systems and Conventional Techniques Vary Only a Few Degrees
Authors
Yukihide Minoda, MD, PhD
Akio Kobayashi, MD, PhD
Hiroyoshi Iwaki, MD, PhD
Hirotsugu Ohashi, MD, PhD
Kunio Takaoka, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0449-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2009 Go to the issue