Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 8/2008

Open Access 01-08-2008 | Original Article

Less Anterior Knee Pain with a Mobile-bearing Prosthesis Compared with a Fixed-bearing Prosthesis

Authors: Stefan J. M. Breugem, MD, Inger N. Sierevelt, MSc, Matthias U. Schafroth, MD, PhD, Leendert Blankevoort, PhD, Gerard R. Schaap, MD, PhD, C. Niek van Dijk, MD, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Anterior knee pain is one of the major short-term complaints after TKA. Since the introduction of the mobile-bearing TKA, numerous studies have attempted to confirm the theoretical advantages of a mobile-bearing TKA over a fixed-bearing TKA but most show little or no actual benefits. The concept of self-alignment for the mobile bearing suggests the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA would provide a lower incidence of anterior knee pain compared with a fixed-bearing TKA. We therefore asked whether the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee would in fact reduce anterior knee pain. We randomized 103 patients scheduled for cemented three-component TKA for osteoarthrosis in a prospective, double-blind clinical trial. With a 1-year followup, more patients experienced persistent anterior knee pain in the posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing group (10 of 53, 18.9%) than in the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing group (two of 47, 4.3%). No differences were observed for range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, Oxford 12-item questionnaire, SF-36, or the American Knee Society score. The posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee therefore seems to provide a short-term advantage compared with the posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing knee.
Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:145–153.PubMedCrossRef Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:145–153.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baldini A, Anderson JA, Zampetti P, Pavlov H, Sculco TP. A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:150–154.PubMedCrossRef Baldini A, Anderson JA, Zampetti P, Pavlov H, Sculco TP. A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:150–154.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46–55.PubMedCrossRef Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46–55.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Bertot AJ, Myers L. Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1121–1131.PubMed Barrack RL, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Bertot AJ, Myers L. Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1121–1131.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2290–2296.PubMedCrossRef Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2290–2296.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:927–933.PubMedCrossRef Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:927–933.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boeckstyns ME, Backer M. Reliability and validity of the evaluation of pain in patients with total knee replacement. Pain. 1989;38:29–33.PubMedCrossRef Boeckstyns ME, Backer M. Reliability and validity of the evaluation of pain in patients with total knee replacement. Pain. 1989;38:29–33.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, Houle T. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:27–36.PubMedCrossRef Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, Houle T. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:27–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:431–449.PubMed Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:431–449.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM, Lam P. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2001;9:45–50. Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM, Lam P. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2001;9:45–50.
11.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–69.PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–69.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:575–582.PubMed Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:575–582.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger: 10- to 17-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:22–27.PubMedCrossRef Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger: 10- to 17-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:22–27.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haas BD, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Anderson DT, Northcut EJ. Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:685–692.PubMedCrossRef Haas BD, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Anderson DT, Northcut EJ. Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:685–692.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:347–352.PubMed Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:347–352.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1193–1196.PubMed Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1193–1196.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Henricson A, Dalen T, Nilsson KG. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:114–121.PubMedCrossRef Henricson A, Dalen T, Nilsson KG. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:114–121.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1317–1323.PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1317–1323.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Maniar R. Rationale for the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 suppl):S23–S27.PubMed Maniar R. Rationale for the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 suppl):S23–S27.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Most E, Li G, Schule S, Sultan P, Park SE, Zayontz S, Rubash HE. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:197–207.PubMedCrossRef Most E, Li G, Schule S, Sultan P, Park SE, Zayontz S, Rubash HE. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:197–207.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hagglund E, Dunningham TH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:675–678.PubMed Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hagglund E, Dunningham TH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:675–678.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Murray DW, Frost SJ. Pain in the assessment of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:426–431.PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Frost SJ. Pain in the assessment of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:426–431.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:221–227.PubMedCrossRef Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:221–227.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Popovic N, Lemaire R. Anterior knee pain with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis: the effect of femoral component design. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:396–400.PubMedCrossRef Popovic N, Lemaire R. Anterior knee pain with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis: the effect of femoral component design. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:396–400.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, de Steiger R, Dodd CA, Gibbons M, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:62–67.PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, de Steiger R, Dodd CA, Gibbons M, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:62–67.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, Rasquinha VJ, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:35–39.PubMedCrossRef Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, Rasquinha VJ, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:35–39.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, Clarke HD. Cemented posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 suppl 1):17–21.PubMedCrossRef Scuderi GR, Clarke HD. Cemented posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 suppl 1):17–21.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott NW. Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:239–246.PubMed Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott NW. Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:239–246.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980–986.PubMed Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980–986.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:187–193.PubMed Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:187–193.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Woolson ST, Northrop GD. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:135–140.PubMedCrossRef Woolson ST, Northrop GD. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:135–140.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Less Anterior Knee Pain with a Mobile-bearing Prosthesis Compared with a Fixed-bearing Prosthesis
Authors
Stefan J. M. Breugem, MD
Inger N. Sierevelt, MSc
Matthias U. Schafroth, MD, PhD
Leendert Blankevoort, PhD
Gerard R. Schaap, MD, PhD
C. Niek van Dijk, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 8/2008 Go to the issue

Symposium: New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation

Controlled Release of Growth Factors on Allograft Bone in vitro

Symposium: New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation

New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation: Editorial Comment

Symposium: New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation

A Perspective: Engineering Periosteum for Structural Bone Graft Healing