Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird and M Desai, Section Editors)

Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era

Authors: Robert Geraghty, Omar Abourmarzouk, Bhavan Rai, Chandra Shakhar Biyani, Nicholas J. Rukin, Bhaskar K. Somani

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Large renal stones (>2 cm) are managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which has a good stone-free rate (SFR) but a relatively high incidence of complications graded Clavien ≥3. We wanted to review the literature for the use of ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation (URSL) for the management of these stones. A systematic review was done from 1990 to April 2014 for all English language articles reporting on a minimum of 10 patients for stones >2 cm in size (done by 2 reviewers independently) in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane review guidelines. A total of 379 articles were identified and after screening for the titles (54) and abstracts (29), 12 papers (651 patients) were included. The male to female ratio was 356:232 with a mean age of 54 years (range 16–86 years). With a mean stone size of 2.7 cm (2–3.15 cm) and the mean operating time of 96 min (28–238 min); the SFR was 91 % (1.45 procedures/patient). The overall number of complications was 58 (8.6 %) of which 26 (4.5 %) were complications classed Clavien ≥3 (haematuria with subcapsular haematoma/clot retention-7; ureteral perforation-7; steinstrasse-5; sepsis/pyelonephritis-5; prostatitis-1; cerebrovascular accident-1). Ureterorenoscopy for large renal stones in the modern era has good SFR with a small risk of major complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turna B, Raza A, Moussa S, Smith G, Tolley DA. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):151–6.PubMedCrossRef Turna B, Raza A, Moussa S, Smith G, Tolley DA. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):151–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium: YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol. 2007;177:168–73.PubMedCrossRef Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium: YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol. 2007;177:168–73.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous lithotripsy equivalent? J Endourol. 2011;25:481–5.PubMedCrossRef Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous lithotripsy equivalent? J Endourol. 2011;25:481–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf Jr JS. AUA nephrolithiasis guideline panel. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000.PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf Jr JS. AUA nephrolithiasis guideline panel. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A, et al. Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2005;173(2):469–73.PubMedCrossRef Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A, et al. Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2005;173(2):469–73.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109(9):1384–9.PubMedCrossRef Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109(9):1384–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O. Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:543537.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O. Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:543537.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hussain M, Archer P, Penev B, Cynk M. Redefining the limits of flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25:45–9.PubMedCrossRef Hussain M, Archer P, Penev B, Cynk M. Redefining the limits of flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25:45–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol. 2009;23:1295–398.CrossRef Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol. 2009;23:1295–398.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179:981–4.PubMedCrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179:981–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24:1583–8.PubMedCrossRef Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24:1583–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol. 2012;19:264–7.PubMedCrossRef Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol. 2012;19:264–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2012;111:127–31.CrossRef Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2012;111:127–31.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Miernik A, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, et al. Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):697–702.PubMedCrossRef Miernik A, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, et al. Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):697–702.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol. 1998;160:346–51.PubMedCrossRef Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol. 1998;160:346–51.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference El-Anany FG, Hammouda HM, Maghraby HA, Elakkad MA. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi. BJU Int. 2001;88:850–3.PubMedCrossRef El-Anany FG, Hammouda HM, Maghraby HA, Elakkad MA. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi. BJU Int. 2001;88:850–3.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, et al. Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm. Urol Res. 2010;38:397–402.PubMedCrossRef Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, et al. Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm. Urol Res. 2010;38:397–402.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, et al. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187:1293–7.PubMedCrossRef Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, et al. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187:1293–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Endourology. 2012;26(10):1257–64.PubMedCrossRef Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Endourology. 2012;26(10):1257–64.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O, Lahme S. Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining of SFR. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):95.PubMedCrossRef Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O, Lahme S. Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining of SFR. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):95.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Li H, Na W, Li H, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method? J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1120–5.PubMedCrossRef Li H, Na W, Li H, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method? J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1120–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era
Authors
Robert Geraghty
Omar Abourmarzouk
Bhavan Rai
Chandra Shakhar Biyani
Nicholas J. Rukin
Bhaskar K. Somani
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Current Urology Reports 8/2015 Go to the issue

Men’s Health (R Carrion and C Yang, Section Editors)

Update on Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Hypogonadal Men

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (V BIRD AND M DESAI, SECTION EDITORS)

Role of Narrow Band Imaging in Management of Urothelial Carcinoma

Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird and M Desai, Section Editors)

Engineering Better Lithotripters

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (K McVary, Section Editor)

Comparison of Patients Undergoing PVP Versus TURP for LUTS/BPH