Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio, Section Editor)

Current Status of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Authors: Jose M. Reyes, Marc C. Smaldone, Robert G. Uzzo, Rosalia Viterbo

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The incidence of incidentally diagnosed small renal masses is rising. Although open partial nephrectomy (OPN) remains the reference standard for clinically localized renal lesions, growing experience with minimally invasive PN has demonstrated equivalent oncologic efficacy and improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared to open techniques. Compared to the technically demanding laparoscopic PN (LPN), robotic PN (RPN) overcomes a number of the technical hurdles of LPN with a shorter learning curve, and now has emerged as an attractive minimally invasive treatment option for amenable tumors. Although experience with RPN has been limited to date, early series have demonstrated short-term oncologic outcomes comparable to OPN and equivalent perioperative outcomes to LPN (all ≤ level III evidence). Although prospective evidence would be ideal, clinical trial comparisons with LPN and OPN will be fraught with accrual challenges and are not expected in the near future. This review summarizes the advantages and indications for a robotic approach, operative principles and emerging technologies, early functional and oncologic outcomes, and expected future advances of RPN for localized renal tumors.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, et al. Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2008;113:78.PubMedCrossRef Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, et al. Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2008;113:78.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, et al. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1331.PubMedCrossRef Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, et al. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1331.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma–a meta-analysis and review. J Urol. 2008;179:1227.PubMedCrossRef Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma–a meta-analysis and review. J Urol. 2008;179:1227.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, et al. National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology. 2006;67:254.PubMedCrossRef Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, et al. National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology. 2006;67:254.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:735.PubMedCrossRef Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:735.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, et al. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2002;59:816.PubMedCrossRef McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, et al. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2002;59:816.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296.PubMedCrossRef Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference •• Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009;181:55. Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare data, the authors demonstrate that radical nephrectomy is associated with an increased risk of overall mortality and a greater number of cardiovascular events when compared to partial nephrectomy renal masses smaller than 4 cm. PubMedCrossRef •• Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009;181:55. Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare data, the authors demonstrate that radical nephrectomy is associated with an increased risk of overall mortality and a greater number of cardiovascular events when compared to partial nephrectomy renal masses smaller than 4 cm. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:468.PubMedCrossRef Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:468.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41.PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59:543.PubMedCrossRef Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59:543.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Hafez KS, et al. Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern? J Urol. 2006;175:853.PubMedCrossRef Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Hafez KS, et al. Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern? J Urol. 2006;175:853.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference •• Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271. This systematic review performed by the American Urological Association guidelines committee summarizes existing survival, oncologic, and complications data and provides general recommendations for the management of clinically localized stage I renal masses. PubMedCrossRef •• Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271. This systematic review performed by the American Urological Association guidelines committee summarizes existing survival, oncologic, and complications data and provides general recommendations for the management of clinically localized stage I renal masses. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol. 2000;163:442.PubMedCrossRef Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol. 2000;163:442.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. [Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case]. Prog Urol. 2000;10:520.PubMed Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. [Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case]. Prog Urol. 2000;10:520.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer. 2007;110:1951.PubMedCrossRef Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer. 2007;110:1951.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference • Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2009;182:866. This multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic versus robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrates that robotic partial nephrectomy provides equivalent early oncological outcomes, decreased hospital stay, decreased blood loss, and decreased warm ischemia time when compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. PubMedCrossRef • Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2009;182:866. This multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic versus robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrates that robotic partial nephrectomy provides equivalent early oncological outcomes, decreased hospital stay, decreased blood loss, and decreased warm ischemia time when compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gautam G, Benway BM, Bhayani SB, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current perspectives and future prospects. Urology. 2009;74:735.PubMedCrossRef Gautam G, Benway BM, Bhayani SB, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current perspectives and future prospects. Urology. 2009;74:735.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol. 1993;7:521.PubMedCrossRef Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol. 1993;7:521.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol. 1993;149:1633.PubMed McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol. 1993;149:1633.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Gill IS, Delworth MG, Munch LC. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 1994;152:1539.PubMed Gill IS, Delworth MG, Munch LC. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 1994;152:1539.PubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Miller DC, Daignault S, Wolf Jr JS, et al. Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer. Med Care. 2008;46:372.PubMedCrossRef Miller DC, Daignault S, Wolf Jr JS, et al. Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer. Med Care. 2008;46:372.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Haseebuddin M, Benway BM, Cabello JM, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon. J Endourol. 2010;24:57.PubMedCrossRef Haseebuddin M, Benway BM, Cabello JM, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon. J Endourol. 2010;24:57.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, et al. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:127.PubMedCrossRef Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, et al. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:127.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:447.PubMedCrossRef Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:447.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6.PubMedCrossRef Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Naeem N, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:101.PubMedCrossRef Naeem N, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:101.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Petros FG, Patel MN, Kheterpal E, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy in the setting of prior abdominal surgery. BJU Int. 2010. Petros FG, Patel MN, Kheterpal E, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy in the setting of prior abdominal surgery. BJU Int. 2010.
32.
go back to reference Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2011;59:325.PubMedCrossRef Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2011;59:325.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lebed B, Jani SD, Kutikov A, et al. Renal masses herniating into the hilum: technical considerations of the “ball-valve phenomenon” during nephron-sparing surgery. Urology. 2010;75:707.PubMedCrossRef Lebed B, Jani SD, Kutikov A, et al. Renal masses herniating into the hilum: technical considerations of the “ball-valve phenomenon” during nephron-sparing surgery. Urology. 2010;75:707.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol. 2008;180:2353.PubMedCrossRef Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol. 2008;180:2353.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol. (in press), 2011. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol. (in press), 2011.
36.
go back to reference Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol. 2010;57:310.PubMedCrossRef Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol. 2010;57:310.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol. 2008;53:514.PubMedCrossRef Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol. 2008;53:514.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Boris R, Proano M, Linehan WM, et al. Initial experience with robot assisted partial nephrectomy for multiple renal masses. J Urol. 2009;182:1280.PubMedCrossRef Boris R, Proano M, Linehan WM, et al. Initial experience with robot assisted partial nephrectomy for multiple renal masses. J Urol. 2009;182:1280.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Touijer K, Jacqmin D, Kavoussi LR, et al. The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol. 2010;57:214.PubMedCrossRef Touijer K, Jacqmin D, Kavoussi LR, et al. The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol. 2010;57:214.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Patel MN, Bhandari M, Menon M, et al. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2009;103:1296.PubMedCrossRef Patel MN, Bhandari M, Menon M, et al. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2009;103:1296.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol. 2009;23:115.PubMedCrossRef Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol. 2009;23:115.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int. 2008;102:86.PubMedCrossRef Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int. 2008;102:86.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ghani KR, Anderson C. Closing the deal: renorrhaphy during laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108:2.PubMedCrossRef Ghani KR, Anderson C. Closing the deal: renorrhaphy during laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108:2.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;55:592.PubMedCrossRef Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;55:592.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Sammon J, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al. Barbed suture for renorrhaphy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:529.PubMedCrossRef Sammon J, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al. Barbed suture for renorrhaphy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:529.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004;64:914.PubMedCrossRef Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004;64:914.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol. 2006;176:36.PubMedCrossRef Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol. 2006;176:36.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ho H, Schwentner C, Neururer R, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes at 1 year. BJU Int. 2009;103:663.PubMedCrossRef Ho H, Schwentner C, Neururer R, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes at 1 year. BJU Int. 2009;103:663.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. J Endourol. 2009;23:1491.PubMedCrossRef Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. J Endourol. 2009;23:1491.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Michli EE, Parra RO. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology. 2009;73:302.PubMedCrossRef Michli EE, Parra RO. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology. 2009;73:302.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Alleemudder A, Dudderidge T. Raj Rao A, et al: Feasibility of robotic partial nephrectomy in a UK Cancer Centre. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011;4:78.CrossRef Alleemudder A, Dudderidge T. Raj Rao A, et al: Feasibility of robotic partial nephrectomy in a UK Cancer Centre. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011;4:78.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, et al. Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2010;28:111.PubMedCrossRef Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, et al. Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2010;28:111.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology. 2010;75:1328.PubMedCrossRef Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology. 2010;75:1328.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of >/=7. Urology. 2011;77:809.PubMedCrossRef White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of >/=7. Urology. 2011;77:809.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology. 2009;73:306.PubMedCrossRef Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology. 2009;73:306.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol. 2008;22:947.PubMedCrossRef Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol. 2008;22:947.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Jeong W, Park SY, Lorenzo EI, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23:1457.PubMedCrossRef Jeong W, Park SY, Lorenzo EI, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23:1457.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology. 2010;76:754.PubMedCrossRef Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology. 2010;76:754.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference DeLong JM, Shapiro O, Moinzadeh A. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon’s initial experience. Can J Urol. 2010;17:5207.PubMed DeLong JM, Shapiro O, Moinzadeh A. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon’s initial experience. Can J Urol. 2010;17:5207.PubMed
60.
go back to reference Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, et al. Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:279.PubMedCrossRef Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, et al. Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:279.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol. 2010;183:1708.PubMedCrossRef Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol. 2010;183:1708.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference • Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844. The authors introduce a novel scoring system to objectively characterize renal mass anatomy using five critical and reproducible anatomical features to provide a tool to standardize classification of renal masses for the effective comparison of case mix. PubMedCrossRef • Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844. The authors introduce a novel scoring system to objectively characterize renal mass anatomy using five critical and reproducible anatomical features to provide a tool to standardize classification of renal masses for the effective comparison of case mix. PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL, et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL nephrometry score. Eur Urol. 2011;60:241.PubMedCrossRef Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL, et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL nephrometry score. Eur Urol. 2011;60:241.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley BJ, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L.-nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology. (in press), 2011. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley BJ, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L.-nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology. (in press), 2011.
66.
go back to reference Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, et al. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. (in press), 2010. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, et al. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. (in press), 2010.
67.
go back to reference Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. (in press), 2011. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. (in press), 2011.
68.
go back to reference Simhan J, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, et al. A nephrometry based comparative analysis of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderate and complex renal tumors. (presented at the Society of Urologic Oncology annual meeting, Besthesda, MD), 2010. Simhan J, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, et al. A nephrometry based comparative analysis of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderate and complex renal tumors. (presented at the Society of Urologic Oncology annual meeting, Besthesda, MD), 2010.
69.
go back to reference Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007;51:186.PubMedCrossRef Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007;51:186.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol. 2010;57:815.PubMedCrossRef Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol. 2010;57:815.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference • Spana G, Haber GP, Dulabon LM, et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol. 2011. In this multi-institutional experience summarizing postoperative complications following robotic partial nephrectomy, the authors demonstrate that robotic partial nephrectomy is safe compared to contemporary procedures and report that most ensuing complications were low grade. • Spana G, Haber GP, Dulabon LM, et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol. 2011. In this multi-institutional experience summarizing postoperative complications following robotic partial nephrectomy, the authors demonstrate that robotic partial nephrectomy is safe compared to contemporary procedures and report that most ensuing complications were low grade.
72.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Comparison of warm ischemia versus no ischemia during partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney. Eur Urol. 2010;58:331.PubMedCrossRef Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Comparison of warm ischemia versus no ischemia during partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney. Eur Urol. 2010;58:331.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;58:340.PubMedCrossRef Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;58:340.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Lane BR, Russo P, Uzzo RG, et al. Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function. J Urol. 2011;185:421.PubMedCrossRef Lane BR, Russo P, Uzzo RG, et al. Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function. J Urol. 2011;185:421.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Simmons MN, Schreiber MJ, Gill IS. Surgical renal ischemia: a contemporary overview. J Urol. 2008;180:19.PubMedCrossRef Simmons MN, Schreiber MJ, Gill IS. Surgical renal ischemia: a contemporary overview. J Urol. 2008;180:19.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Abaza R, Picard J. A novel technique for laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy: feasibility study. J Endourol. 2008;22:1715.PubMedCrossRef Abaza R, Picard J. A novel technique for laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy: feasibility study. J Endourol. 2008;22:1715.PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:627.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:627.PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, et al. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol. 2010;183:34.PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, et al. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol. 2010;183:34.PubMedCrossRef
79.
80.
go back to reference Piotrowski Z, Canter DJ, Kutikov A, et al. Metanephric adenofibroma: robotic partial nephrectomy of a large Wilms’ tumor variant. Can J Urol. 2010;17:5309.PubMed Piotrowski Z, Canter DJ, Kutikov A, et al. Metanephric adenofibroma: robotic partial nephrectomy of a large Wilms’ tumor variant. Can J Urol. 2010;17:5309.PubMed
81.
go back to reference Lane BR, Gill IS. 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010;183:473.PubMedCrossRef Lane BR, Gill IS. 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010;183:473.PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Viprakasit DP, Altamar HO, Miller NL, et al. Selective renal parenchymal clamping in robotic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. Urology. 2010;76:750.PubMedCrossRef Viprakasit DP, Altamar HO, Miller NL, et al. Selective renal parenchymal clamping in robotic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. Urology. 2010;76:750.PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol. 2011;59:128.PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol. 2011;59:128.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference White WM, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar occlusion. BJU Int. 2010;105:1580.PubMedCrossRef White WM, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar occlusion. BJU Int. 2010;105:1580.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Hyams ES, Perlmutter M, Stifelman MD. A prospective evaluation of the utility of laparoscopic Doppler technology during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2011;77:617.PubMedCrossRef Hyams ES, Perlmutter M, Stifelman MD. A prospective evaluation of the utility of laparoscopic Doppler technology during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2011;77:617.PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Tobis S, Knopf J, Silvers C, et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging with robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience for renal cortical tumors. J Urol. 2011;186:47.PubMedCrossRef Tobis S, Knopf J, Silvers C, et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging with robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience for renal cortical tumors. J Urol. 2011;186:47.PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology. 2009;74:801.PubMedCrossRef White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology. 2009;74:801.PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Stein RJ, White WM, Goel RK, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol. 2010;57:132.PubMedCrossRef Stein RJ, White WM, Goel RK, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol. 2010;57:132.PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Kaouk JH, White WM, Goel RK, et al. NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. Urology. 2009;74:5.PubMedCrossRef Kaouk JH, White WM, Goel RK, et al. NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. Urology. 2009;74:5.PubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology. 2008;71:996.PubMedCrossRef Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology. 2008;71:996.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current Status of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
Authors
Jose M. Reyes
Marc C. Smaldone
Robert G. Uzzo
Rosalia Viterbo
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0223-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Current Urology Reports 1/2012 Go to the issue

New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala, Section Editor)

Advanced Renal Mass Imaging: Diffusion and Perfusion MRI

New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala, Section editor

Dual-energy Computed Tomography Applications in Uroradiology

New Techniques: Imaging (A Atala, Section Editor)

Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer