Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Other Pain (A Kaye and N Vadivelu, Section Editors)

Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain

Authors: Fangfang Xing, R. Jason Yong, Alan David Kaye, Richard D. Urman

Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of the present investigation is to summarize the body and quality of evidence including the most recent studies in support of intrathecal drug delivery systems and spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of cancer-related pain.

Recent Findings

In the past 3 years, a number of prospective studies have been published supporting intrathecal drug delivery systems for cancer pain. Additional investigation with adjuvants to morphine-based analgesia including dexmedetomidine and ziconotide support drug-induced benefits of patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia. A study has also been recently published regarding cost-savings for intrathecal drug delivery system compared to pharmacologic management, but an analysis in the Ontario, Canada healthcare system projects additional financial costs. Finally, the Polyanalgesic Consensus Committee has updated its recommendations regarding clinical guidelines for intrathecal drug delivery systems to include new information on dosing, trialing, safety, and systemic opioid reduction. There is still a paucity of clinical evidence for spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of cancer pain. There are new intrathecal drugs under investigation including various conopeptides and AYX1.

Summary

Large, prospective, modern, randomized controlled studies are still needed to support the use of both intrathecal drug delivery systems as well as spinal cord stimulation for cancer pain populations. There are multiple prospective and small randomized controlled studies that highlight a potential promising future for these interventional modalities. Related to the challenge and urgency of cancer pain, the pain practitioner community is moving toward a multimodal approach that includes discussions regarding the role of intrathecal therapies and spinal cord stimulation to the individualized treatment of patients.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Stearns L, Boortz-Marx R, Du Pen S, Friehs G, Gordon M, Halyard M, et al. Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of cancer pain: a multidisciplinary consensus of best clinical practices. J Support Oncol. 2005;3(6):399–408.PubMed Stearns L, Boortz-Marx R, Du Pen S, Friehs G, Gordon M, Halyard M, et al. Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of cancer pain: a multidisciplinary consensus of best clinical practices. J Support Oncol. 2005;3(6):399–408.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Onofrio BM, Yaksh TL, Arnold PG. Continuous low-dose intrathecal morphine administration in the treatment of chronic pain of malignant origin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56(8):516–20.PubMed Onofrio BM, Yaksh TL, Arnold PG. Continuous low-dose intrathecal morphine administration in the treatment of chronic pain of malignant origin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56(8):516–20.PubMed
10.
go back to reference • Deer TR, Caraway DL, Wallace MS. A definition of refractory pain to help determine suitability for device implantation. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(8):711–5. Review of “refractory pain” and associated terms on the clinical decision to offer implantable therapies as well as argument for new definition. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12263.CrossRefPubMed • Deer TR, Caraway DL, Wallace MS. A definition of refractory pain to help determine suitability for device implantation. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(8):711–5. Review of “refractory pain” and associated terms on the clinical decision to offer implantable therapies as well as argument for new definition. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12263.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Deer TR, Smith HS, Burton AW, Pope JE, Doleys DM, Levy RM, et al. Comprehensive consensus based guidelines on intrathecal drug delivery systems in the treatment of pain caused by cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2011;14(3):E283–312.PubMed Deer TR, Smith HS, Burton AW, Pope JE, Doleys DM, Levy RM, et al. Comprehensive consensus based guidelines on intrathecal drug delivery systems in the treatment of pain caused by cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2011;14(3):E283–312.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Brogan S, Junkins S. Interventional therapies for the management of cancer pain. J Support Oncol. 2010;8(2):52–9.PubMed Brogan S, Junkins S. Interventional therapies for the management of cancer pain. J Support Oncol. 2010;8(2):52–9.PubMed
13.
go back to reference •• Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Bux A, Buchser E, Eldabe S, et al. The polyanalgesic consensus conference (pacc): recommendations on intrathecal drug infusion systems best practices and guidelines. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(2):96–132. Expert consensus on practice guidelines for intrathecal therapies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12538.CrossRefPubMed •• Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Bux A, Buchser E, Eldabe S, et al. The polyanalgesic consensus conference (pacc): recommendations on intrathecal drug infusion systems best practices and guidelines. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(2):96–132. Expert consensus on practice guidelines for intrathecal therapies. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12538.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference •• Deer TR, Hayek SM, Pope JE, Lamer TJ, Hamza M, Grider JS, et al. The polyanalgesic consensus conference (pacc): recommendations for trialing of intrathecal drug delivery infusion therapy. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(2):133–54. Expert consensus on the trialing process for intrathetcal drug delivery prior to implantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12543.CrossRefPubMed •• Deer TR, Hayek SM, Pope JE, Lamer TJ, Hamza M, Grider JS, et al. The polyanalgesic consensus conference (pacc): recommendations for trialing of intrathecal drug delivery infusion therapy. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(2):133–54. Expert consensus on the trialing process for intrathetcal drug delivery prior to implantation. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12543.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bruel BM, Burton AW. Intrathecal therapy for cancer-related pain. Pain Med. 2016;17:2404–21. Bruel BM, Burton AW. Intrathecal therapy for cancer-related pain. Pain Med. 2016;17:2404–21.
17.
go back to reference •• Kurita GP, Benthien KS, Nordly M, Mercadante S, Klepstad P, Sjogren P. The evidence of neuraxial administration of analgesics for cancer-related pain: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(9):1103–15. Excellent systematic review of existing evidence for intrathecal therapies for cancer pain with detailed tables listing findings and limitations of key studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12485.CrossRefPubMed •• Kurita GP, Benthien KS, Nordly M, Mercadante S, Klepstad P, Sjogren P. The evidence of neuraxial administration of analgesics for cancer-related pain: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(9):1103–15. Excellent systematic review of existing evidence for intrathecal therapies for cancer pain with detailed tables listing findings and limitations of key studies. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​aas.​12485.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, Boortz-Marx RL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(19):4040–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.02.118.CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, Boortz-Marx RL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(19):4040–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2002.​02.​118.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Coyne PJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, et al. An implantable drug delivery system (idds) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with comprehensive medical management (cmm). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(5):825–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi156.CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Coyne PJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, et al. An implantable drug delivery system (idds) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with comprehensive medical management (cmm). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(5):825–33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdi156.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference • Mitchell A, McGhie J, Owen M, Mcginn G. Audit of intrathecal drug delivery for patients with difficult-to-control cancer pain shows a sustained reduction in pain severity scores over a 6-month period. Palliat Med. 2015;29(6):554–63. Positive prospective case series evaluating efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery in difficult to control cancer pain. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315570514.CrossRefPubMed • Mitchell A, McGhie J, Owen M, Mcginn G. Audit of intrathecal drug delivery for patients with difficult-to-control cancer pain shows a sustained reduction in pain severity scores over a 6-month period. Palliat Med. 2015;29(6):554–63. Positive prospective case series evaluating efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery in difficult to control cancer pain. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0269216315570514​.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference • Brogan SE, Winter NB, Okifuji A. Prospective observational study of patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia: impact on cancer-associated symptoms, breakthrough pain control, and patient satisfaction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(4):369–75. Positive prospective study evaluating the clinical response to patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia with respect to pain control and patient satisfaction in cancer pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000251.CrossRefPubMed • Brogan SE, Winter NB, Okifuji A. Prospective observational study of patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia: impact on cancer-associated symptoms, breakthrough pain control, and patient satisfaction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(4):369–75. Positive prospective study evaluating the clinical response to patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia with respect to pain control and patient satisfaction in cancer pain. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​AAP.​0000000000000251​.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Dupoiron D, Bore F, Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Brenet O, Debourmont S, Dixmerias F, et al. Ziconotide adverse events in patients with cancer pain: a multicenter observational study of a slow titration, multidrug protocol. Pain Physician. 2012;15(5):395–403.PubMed Dupoiron D, Bore F, Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Brenet O, Debourmont S, Dixmerias F, et al. Ziconotide adverse events in patients with cancer pain: a multicenter observational study of a slow titration, multidrug protocol. Pain Physician. 2012;15(5):395–403.PubMed
31.
go back to reference • de la Calle Gil AB, Pena Vergara I, Cormane Bornacelly MA, Pajuelo Gallego A. Intrathecal ziconotide and morphine for pain relief: a case series of eight patients with refractory cancer pain, including five cases of neuropathic pain. Neurol Ther. 2015;4(2):159–68. Positive case series for the combination of morphine and ziconotide for cancer pain treatment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-015-0035-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • de la Calle Gil AB, Pena Vergara I, Cormane Bornacelly MA, Pajuelo Gallego A. Intrathecal ziconotide and morphine for pain relief: a case series of eight patients with refractory cancer pain, including five cases of neuropathic pain. Neurol Ther. 2015;4(2):159–68. Positive case series for the combination of morphine and ziconotide for cancer pain treatment. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40120-015-0035-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Peng L, Min S, Zejun Z, Wei K, Bennett MI. Spinal cord stimulation for cancer-related pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD009389. Peng L, Min S, Zejun Z, Wei K, Bennett MI. Spinal cord stimulation for cancer-related pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD009389.
39.
go back to reference Shimoji K, Hokari T, Kano T, Tomita M, Kimura R, Watanabe S, et al. Management of intractable pain with percutaneous epidural spinal cord stimulation: differences in pain-relieving effects among diseases and sites of pain. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(1):110–6.CrossRefPubMed Shimoji K, Hokari T, Kano T, Tomita M, Kimura R, Watanabe S, et al. Management of intractable pain with percutaneous epidural spinal cord stimulation: differences in pain-relieving effects among diseases and sites of pain. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(1):110–6.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Tsubota S, Higaki N, Nagaro T. A case of neuropathic cancer pain in the lower extremities successfully treated with spinal cord stimulation. Masui. 2009;58(11):1460–1.PubMed Tsubota S, Higaki N, Nagaro T. A case of neuropathic cancer pain in the lower extremities successfully treated with spinal cord stimulation. Masui. 2009;58(11):1460–1.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain
Authors
Fangfang Xing
R. Jason Yong
Alan David Kaye
Richard D. Urman
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0662-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2018 Go to the issue

Childhood and Adolescent Headache (S Evers, Section Editor)

Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension: a Current Literature Review

Chronic Daily Headache (S-J Wang, Section Editor)

Migraine and the Hippocampus

Other Pain (A Kaye and N Vadivelu, Section Editors)

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Current Concepts and Treatment Options