Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports 4/2013

01-12-2013 | The Why and How of Fracture Liaison Services (SL Silverman, Section Editor)

Commentary: The Five Ws of a Fracture Liaison Service: Why, Who, What, Where, and How? In Osteoporosis, We Reap What We Sow

Authors: Jeffrey R. Curtis, Stuart L. Silverman

Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Establishing a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) to identify and treat patients with a recent fragility fracture has been shown to be effective, save money, useful to document high quality of care, and makes good clinical sense. A FLS starts with an osteoporosis champion and encompasses identification of patients with a recent fracture, diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up. A FLS is most effective when it is able to function in multiple settings: the hospital, emergency department, and outpatient clinic. Implementation may be somewhat easier in a closed healthcare system but can be feasible even in an open system. There are many barriers to implementation which can be addressed. The future of FLS care lies in a collaborative systems-based approach with appropriate stakeholder engagement, leading to seamless integration of osteoporosis care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grace SC, Elliot MN, Giordino LA, et al. Health related quality of life and quality of care in specialized Medicare managed plans. Ambul Care Manag. 2013;36:72–84.CrossRef Grace SC, Elliot MN, Giordino LA, et al. Health related quality of life and quality of care in specialized Medicare managed plans. Ambul Care Manag. 2013;36:72–84.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mitchell PJ. Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:52–60.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell PJ. Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:52–60.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A, et al. ASBMR Task Force on Secondary Fracture Prevention. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASMBR ttask froce report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;10:2039–46. Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A, et al. ASBMR Task Force on Secondary Fracture Prevention. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASMBR ttask froce report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;10:2039–46.
4.
go back to reference Dell R. Fracture prevention in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:457–60.PubMedCrossRef Dell R. Fracture prevention in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:457–60.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Newman ED. Perspectives on prefracture intervention strategies: the Geisinger Health System Osteoporosis Program. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:451–5.PubMedCrossRef Newman ED. Perspectives on prefracture intervention strategies: the Geisinger Health System Osteoporosis Program. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:451–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2013. Available at: www.nof.org/hcp/clinicians-guide. Accessed September 6, 2013. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2013. Available at: www.​nof.​org/​hcp/​clinicians-guide. Accessed September 6, 2013.
8.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Kim Y, Bryant T, Allison J, Scott D, Saag KG. Osteoporosis in the home health care setting: a window of opportunity? Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(6):971–5.PubMedCrossRef Curtis JR, Kim Y, Bryant T, Allison J, Scott D, Saag KG. Osteoporosis in the home health care setting: a window of opportunity? Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(6):971–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Becker DJ, Yun H, Kilgore ML, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Gary LC, et al. Health services utilization after fractures: evidence from Medicare. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(9):1012–20.PubMedCrossRef Becker DJ, Yun H, Kilgore ML, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Gary LC, et al. Health services utilization after fractures: evidence from Medicare. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(9):1012–20.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Warriner AH, Outman RC, Saag KG, Berry SD, Colón-Emeric C, Flood KL, et al. Management of osteoporosis among home health and long-term care patients with a prior fracture. South Med J. 2009;102(4):397–404.PubMedCrossRef Warriner AH, Outman RC, Saag KG, Berry SD, Colón-Emeric C, Flood KL, et al. Management of osteoporosis among home health and long-term care patients with a prior fracture. South Med J. 2009;102(4):397–404.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Arora T, Matthews RS, Taylor A, Becker DJ, Colon-Emeric C, et al. Is withholding osteoporosis medication after fracture sometimes rational? A comparison of the risk for second fracture vs death. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(8):584–91.PubMedCrossRef Curtis JR, Arora T, Matthews RS, Taylor A, Becker DJ, Colon-Emeric C, et al. Is withholding osteoporosis medication after fracture sometimes rational? A comparison of the risk for second fracture vs death. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(8):584–91.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang J, Delzell E, Zhao H, Laster AJ, Saag KG, Kilgore ML, et al. Central DXA utilization shifts from office-based to hospital-based settings among Medicare beneficiaries in the wake of reimbursement changes. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(4):858–64.PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Delzell E, Zhao H, Laster AJ, Saag KG, Kilgore ML, et al. Central DXA utilization shifts from office-based to hospital-based settings among Medicare beneficiaries in the wake of reimbursement changes. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(4):858–64.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mitchell P. Fracture Liaison Service: the United Kingdom experience. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:487–94.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell P. Fracture Liaison Service: the United Kingdom experience. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:487–94.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Commentary: The Five Ws of a Fracture Liaison Service: Why, Who, What, Where, and How? In Osteoporosis, We Reap What We Sow
Authors
Jeffrey R. Curtis
Stuart L. Silverman
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Electronic ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-013-0177-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Current Osteoporosis Reports 4/2013 Go to the issue

Osteoporosis and Cancer (P Taxel, Section Editor)

Osteoporosis after Stem Cell Transplantation

Quality of Care in Osteoporosis (SL Silverman, Section Editor)

Review of New Guidelines for the Management of Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology (RA Adler, Section Editor)

Temporal Trends in the Incidence of Osteoporotic Fractures

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology (RA Adler, Section Editor)

Idiopathic Osteoporosis in Men

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology (RA Adler, Section Editor)

Recent Advances: Osteoporosis in the “Oldest Old”

The Why and How of Fracture Liaison Services (SL Silverman, Section Editor)

Fracture Liaison Services in an Open System: How was it Done? What Were the Barriers and How Were They Overcome?