Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports 1/2010

01-03-2010

Benefits and Limitations of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover Markers to Monitor Patients Treated for Osteoporosis

Author: E. Michael Lewiecki

Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Medications are approved by regulatory agencies for treating osteoporosis when at least one randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial shows a reduction in vertebral fracture risk and the benefit-risk ratio is determined to be acceptable. Subjects who participate in registration trials are a generally homogeneous group carefully screened with strict entry criteria. Individual patients who are treated for osteoporosis in clinical practice commonly differ from subjects enrolled in these clinical trials according to confounding factors that include age, sex, comorbidities, compliance, and persistence. Because the goal of therapy is reduction of fracture risk, and this cannot be directly assessed in an individual patient, biomarkers are commonly used as surrogate end points for effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical use and abuse of the two biomarkers most commonly used to assess the effectiveness of therapy in clinical practice: bone mineral density testing and measurement of markers of bone turnover.
Literature
1.
go back to reference NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy: Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001, 285:785–795.CrossRef NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy: Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001, 285:785–795.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al.: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465–475.CrossRefPubMed Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al.: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465–475.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O: Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:229–238.CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O: Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:229–238.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference WHO Study Group on Assessment of Fracture Risk and its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Assessment of Fracture Risk and Its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Technical report series 843. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994 WHO Study Group on Assessment of Fracture Risk and its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Assessment of Fracture Risk and Its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Technical report series 843. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994
5.
go back to reference •• Baim S, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, et al.: Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom 2008, 11:75–91. The ISCD Official Positions include essential quality standards for the clinical use of BMD testing to monitor response to osteoporosis therapy.CrossRefPubMed •• Baim S, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, et al.: Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom 2008, 11:75–91. The ISCD Official Positions include essential quality standards for the clinical use of BMD testing to monitor response to osteoporosis therapy.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization: FRAX WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. World Health Organization: FRAX WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
7.
go back to reference • National Osteoporosis Foundation: Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2008. These evidence-based guidelines for managing osteoporosis in the United States provide recommendations for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis with BMD testing and BTMs. • National Osteoporosis Foundation: Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2008. These evidence-based guidelines for managing osteoporosis in the United States provide recommendations for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis with BMD testing and BTMs.
8.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, et al.: European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:399–428.CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, et al.: European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:399–428.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dowd R, Recker RR, Heaney RP: Study subjects and ordinary patients. Osteoporosis Int 2000, 11:533–536.CrossRef Dowd R, Recker RR, Heaney RP: Study subjects and ordinary patients. Osteoporosis Int 2000, 11:533–536.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Chan WW, Lewiecki EM: Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 2009 Jul 2 [Epub ahead of print]. Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Chan WW, Lewiecki EM: Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 2009 Jul 2 [Epub ahead of print].
11.
go back to reference Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM: A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1023–1031.CrossRefPubMed Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM: A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1023–1031.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, et al.: Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 2006, 81:1013–1022.CrossRefPubMed Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, et al.: Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 2006, 81:1013–1022.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Biomarkers Definitions Working Group: Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001, 69:89–95.CrossRef Biomarkers Definitions Working Group: Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001, 69:89–95.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference • Bouxsein ML, Delmas PD: Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:1155–1167. This is a thorough review of the evidence supporting the use of BMD testing and BTMs as surrogate end points in clinical trials of bone-active pharmacologic agents, with implications for their use in clinical practice.CrossRefPubMed • Bouxsein ML, Delmas PD: Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:1155–1167. This is a thorough review of the evidence supporting the use of BMD testing and BTMs as surrogate end points in clinical trials of bone-active pharmacologic agents, with implications for their use in clinical practice.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM, Watts NB: Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1363–1368.CrossRefPubMed Lewiecki EM, Watts NB: Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1363–1368.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wasnich RD, Miller PD: Antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive agents are related to changes in bone density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:231–236.CrossRefPubMed Wasnich RD, Miller PD: Antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive agents are related to changes in bone density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:231–236.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, et al: Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 2002, 112:281–289.CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, et al: Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 2002, 112:281–289.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hochberg MC, Greenspan S, Wasnich RD, et al.: Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002, 87:1586–1592.CrossRefPubMed Hochberg MC, Greenspan S, Wasnich RD, et al.: Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002, 87:1586–1592.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM, Rudolph LA: How common is loss of bone mineral density in elderly clinical practice patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17(Suppl 2):S367. Lewiecki EM, Rudolph LA: How common is loss of bone mineral density in elderly clinical practice patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17(Suppl 2):S367.
20.
go back to reference Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L, et al.: Association between change in bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fracture in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:361–370.CrossRefPubMed Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L, et al.: Association between change in bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fracture in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:361–370.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al.: Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 1996, 348:1535–1541.CrossRefPubMed Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al.: Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 1996, 348:1535–1541.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al.: Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 1998, 280:2077–2082.CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al.: Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 1998, 280:2077–2082.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, et al.: Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1999, 282:637–645.CrossRefPubMed Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, et al.: Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1999, 282:637–645.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W, et al.: Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 2000, 283:1318–1321.CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W, et al.: Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 2000, 283:1318–1321.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lenchik L, Watts NB: Regression to the mean: what does it mean? Using bone density results to monitor treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2001, 4:1–4.CrossRefPubMed Lenchik L, Watts NB: Regression to the mean: what does it mean? Using bone density results to monitor treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2001, 4:1–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bonnick SL: Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: a vital tool or regression toward mediocrity? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:3493–3495.CrossRefPubMed Bonnick SL: Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: a vital tool or regression toward mediocrity? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:3493–3495.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sebba AI: Significance of a decline in bone mineral density while receiving oral bisphosphonate treatment. Clin Ther 2008, 30:443–452.CrossRefPubMed Sebba AI: Significance of a decline in bone mineral density while receiving oral bisphosphonate treatment. Clin Ther 2008, 30:443–452.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bell KJ, Hayen A, Macaskill P, et al.: Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ 2009, 338:b2266.CrossRefPubMed Bell KJ, Hayen A, Macaskill P, et al.: Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ 2009, 338:b2266.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL, et al.: Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:1643–1646.CrossRefPubMed Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL, et al.: Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:1643–1646.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al.: Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:1434–1441.CrossRefPubMed Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al.: Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:1434–1441.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Watts NB, Miller PD, Kohlmeier LA, et al.: Vertebral fracture risk is reduced in women who lose femoral neck bone mineral density with teriparatide treatment. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:1125–1131.CrossRefPubMed Watts NB, Miller PD, Kohlmeier LA, et al.: Vertebral fracture risk is reduced in women who lose femoral neck bone mineral density with teriparatide treatment. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:1125–1131.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM: Crisis in osteoporosis care. The Female Patient 2009, 34:1–2. Lewiecki EM: Crisis in osteoporosis care. The Female Patient 2009, 34:1–2.
35.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM, Baim S, Siris ES: Osteoporosis care at risk in the United States. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1505–1509.CrossRefPubMed Lewiecki EM, Baim S, Siris ES: Osteoporosis care at risk in the United States. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1505–1509.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Greenspan SL, Parker RA, Ferguson L, et al.: Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1431–1438.CrossRefPubMed Greenspan SL, Parker RA, Ferguson L, et al.: Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1431–1438.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Eastell R, Barton I, Hannon RA, et al.: Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:1051–1056.CrossRefPubMed Eastell R, Barton I, Hannon RA, et al.: Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:1051–1056.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Bauer DC, Black DM, Garnero P, et al.: Change in bone turnover and hip, non-spine, and vertebral fracture in alendronate-treated women: the fracture intervention trial. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1250–1258.CrossRefPubMed Bauer DC, Black DM, Garnero P, et al.: Change in bone turnover and hip, non-spine, and vertebral fracture in alendronate-treated women: the fracture intervention trial. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1250–1258.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sarkar S, Reginster JY, Crans GG, et al.: Relationship between changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD to predict vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:394–401.CrossRefPubMed Sarkar S, Reginster JY, Crans GG, et al.: Relationship between changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD to predict vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:394–401.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Chen P, Satterwhite JH, Licata AA, et al.: Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:962–970.CrossRefPubMed Chen P, Satterwhite JH, Licata AA, et al.: Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:962–970.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Hannon R, Eastell R: Preanalytical variability of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11(Suppl 6):S30–S44.CrossRefPubMed Hannon R, Eastell R: Preanalytical variability of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11(Suppl 6):S30–S44.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Seibel MJ: Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochem Rev 2005, 26:97–122.PubMed Seibel MJ: Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochem Rev 2005, 26:97–122.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Seibel MJ, Lang M, Geilenkeuser WJ: Interlaboratory variation of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Clin Chem 2001, 47:1443–1450.PubMed Seibel MJ, Lang M, Geilenkeuser WJ: Interlaboratory variation of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Clin Chem 2001, 47:1443–1450.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Bergmann P, Body JJ, Boonen S, et al.: Evidence-based guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the selection and monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Int J Clin Pract 2009, 63:19–26.CrossRefPubMed Bergmann P, Body JJ, Boonen S, et al.: Evidence-based guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the selection and monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Int J Clin Pract 2009, 63:19–26.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Srivastava AK, Vliet EL, Lewiecki EM, et al.: Clinical use of serum and urine bone markers in the management of osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005, 21:1015–1026.CrossRefPubMed Srivastava AK, Vliet EL, Lewiecki EM, et al.: Clinical use of serum and urine bone markers in the management of osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005, 21:1015–1026.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Nishizawa Y, Nakamura T, Ohta H, et al.: Guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis (2004). J Bone Miner Metab 2005, 23:97–104.CrossRefPubMed Nishizawa Y, Nakamura T, Ohta H, et al.: Guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis (2004). J Bone Miner Metab 2005, 23:97–104.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R: The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89:1117–1123.CrossRefPubMed Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R: The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89:1117–1123.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Meier C, Seibel MJ, Kraenzlin ME: Use of bone turnover markers in the real world: are we there yet? J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:386–388.CrossRefPubMed Meier C, Seibel MJ, Kraenzlin ME: Use of bone turnover markers in the real world: are we there yet? J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:386–388.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, et al.: 2008 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: update on osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2009, 12:135–157.CrossRefPubMed Lewiecki EM, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, et al.: 2008 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: update on osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2009, 12:135–157.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Singer FR, Eyre DR: Using biochemical markers of bone turnover in clinical practice. Cleve Clin J Med 2008, 75:739–750.CrossRefPubMed Singer FR, Eyre DR: Using biochemical markers of bone turnover in clinical practice. Cleve Clin J Med 2008, 75:739–750.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Benefits and Limitations of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover Markers to Monitor Patients Treated for Osteoporosis
Author
E. Michael Lewiecki
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Electronic ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-010-0004-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Current Osteoporosis Reports 1/2010 Go to the issue