Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Oncology Reports 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Melanoma (RJ Sullivan, Section Editor)

Influences of BRAF Inhibitors on the Immune Microenvironment and the Rationale for Combined Molecular and Immune Targeted Therapy

Authors: Sangeetha M. Reddy, Alexandre Reuben, Jennifer A. Wargo

Published in: Current Oncology Reports | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The identification of key driver mutations in melanoma has led to the development of targeted therapies aimed at BRAF and MEK, but responses are often limited in duration. There is growing evidence that MAPK pathway activation impairs antitumor immunity and that targeting this pathway may enhance responses to immunotherapies. There is also evidence that immune mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy exist, providing the rationale for combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy in combining these strategies, and combination clinical trials are ongoing. It is, however, becoming clear that additional translational studies are needed to better understand toxicity, proper timing, and sequence of therapy, as well as the utility of multidrug regimens and effects of other targeted agents on antitumor immunity. Insights gained through translational research in preclinical models and clinical studies will provide mechanistic insight into therapeutic response and resistance and help devise rational strategies to enhance therapeutic responses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–54.CrossRefPubMed Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–54.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Singh M, Lin J, Hocker TL, Tsao H. Genetics of melanoma tumorigenesis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:15–21.CrossRefPubMed Singh M, Lin J, Hocker TL, Tsao H. Genetics of melanoma tumorigenesis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:15–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.CrossRefPubMed Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Dreno B, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1867–76.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Dreno B, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1867–76.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carvajal RD, Sosman JA, Quevedo JF, et al. Effect of selumetinib vs chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:2397–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carvajal RD, Sosman JA, Quevedo JF, et al. Effect of selumetinib vs chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:2397–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Long GV, Fung C, Menzies AM, et al. Increased MAPK reactivation in early resistance to dabrafenib/trametinib combination therapy of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5694.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Fung C, Menzies AM, et al. Increased MAPK reactivation in early resistance to dabrafenib/trametinib combination therapy of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5694.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kwong LN, Boland GM, Frederick DT, et al. Co-clinical assessment identifies patterns of BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1459–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwong LN, Boland GM, Frederick DT, et al. Co-clinical assessment identifies patterns of BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1459–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
12.
go back to reference Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:107–14.CrossRefPubMed Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:107–14.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
15.
go back to reference Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94.CrossRefPubMed Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Prieto PA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: long-term follow-up of 177 patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2039–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prieto PA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: long-term follow-up of 177 patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2039–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:908–18.CrossRefPubMed Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:908–18.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1020–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1020–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or Monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1270–1.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or Monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1270–1.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2006–17.CrossRefPubMed Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2006–17.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boni A, Cogdill AP, Dang P, et al. Selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances T-cell recognition of melanoma without affecting lymphocyte function. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5213–9.CrossRefPubMed Boni A, Cogdill AP, Dang P, et al. Selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances T-cell recognition of melanoma without affecting lymphocyte function. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5213–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.••
go back to reference Frederick DT, Piris A, Cogdill AP, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1225–31. BRAF/MAPK inhibition causes a more favorable immune microenvironment due to increased melanoma differentiation antigen expression as well as decrease in immunosuppressive cytokines. Also noted, however, in this translational human tissue based study is an increase in exhaustion markers PD-1, PD-L1, and TIM-3. The favorable changes are seen within 10-14 days and lost by several weeks after treatment.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frederick DT, Piris A, Cogdill AP, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1225–31. BRAF/MAPK inhibition causes a more favorable immune microenvironment due to increased melanoma differentiation antigen expression as well as decrease in immunosuppressive cytokines. Also noted, however, in this translational human tissue based study is an increase in exhaustion markers PD-1, PD-L1, and TIM-3. The favorable changes are seen within 10-14 days and lost by several weeks after treatment.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, Ahmed Z, Wargo JA. Combining checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted agents against metastatic melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e24320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, Ahmed Z, Wargo JA. Combining checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted agents against metastatic melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e24320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.••
go back to reference Cooper ZA, Juneja VR, Sage PT, et al. Response to BRAF inhibition in melanoma is enhanced when combined with immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:643–54. In vivo mouse model demonstrates that BRAF inhibition enhances number and function of intratumoral T cells and that following BRAF inhibition by checkpoint inhibition leads to improved tumor control and survival.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cooper ZA, Juneja VR, Sage PT, et al. Response to BRAF inhibition in melanoma is enhanced when combined with immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:643–54. In vivo mouse model demonstrates that BRAF inhibition enhances number and function of intratumoral T cells and that following BRAF inhibition by checkpoint inhibition leads to improved tumor control and survival.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Dobreva ZG, Miteva LD, Stanilova SA. The inhibition of JNK and p38 MAPKs downregulates IL-10 and differentially affects c-Jun gene expression in human monocytes. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31:195–201.CrossRefPubMed Dobreva ZG, Miteva LD, Stanilova SA. The inhibition of JNK and p38 MAPKs downregulates IL-10 and differentially affects c-Jun gene expression in human monocytes. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31:195–201.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Liu C, Peng W, Xu C, et al. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:393–403.CrossRefPubMed Liu C, Peng W, Xu C, et al. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:393–403.CrossRefPubMed
29.••
go back to reference Jiang X, Zhou J, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. The activation of MAPK in melanoma cells resistant to BRAF inhibition promotes PD-L1 expression that is reversible by MEK and PI3K inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:598–609. BRAF inhibitor resistance is mediated by immune microenvironment with upregulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells.CrossRefPubMed Jiang X, Zhou J, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. The activation of MAPK in melanoma cells resistant to BRAF inhibition promotes PD-L1 expression that is reversible by MEK and PI3K inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:598–609. BRAF inhibitor resistance is mediated by immune microenvironment with upregulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Schilling B, Paschen A. Immunological consequences of selective BRAF inhibitors in malignant melanoma: Neutralization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e25218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schilling B, Paschen A. Immunological consequences of selective BRAF inhibitors in malignant melanoma: Neutralization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e25218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Ho PC, Meeth KM, Tsui YC, et al. Immune-based antitumor effects of BRAF inhibitors rely on signaling by CD40L and IFNgamma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3205–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ho PC, Meeth KM, Tsui YC, et al. Immune-based antitumor effects of BRAF inhibitors rely on signaling by CD40L and IFNgamma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3205–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Khalili JS, Liu S, Rodriguez-Cruz TG, et al. Oncogenic BRAF(V600E) promotes stromal cell-mediated immunosuppression via induction of interleukin-1 in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5329–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khalili JS, Liu S, Rodriguez-Cruz TG, et al. Oncogenic BRAF(V600E) promotes stromal cell-mediated immunosuppression via induction of interleukin-1 in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5329–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Sumimoto H, Imabayashi F, Iwata T, Kawakami Y. The BRAF-MAPK signaling pathway is essential for cancer-immune evasion in human melanoma cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1651–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sumimoto H, Imabayashi F, Iwata T, Kawakami Y. The BRAF-MAPK signaling pathway is essential for cancer-immune evasion in human melanoma cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1651–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
36.
go back to reference Vergani E, Di Guardo L, Dugo M, et al. Overcoming melanoma resistance to vemurafenib by targeting CCL2-induced miR-34a, miR-100 and miR-125b. Oncotarget. 2016;7:4428–41. Vergani E, Di Guardo L, Dugo M, et al. Overcoming melanoma resistance to vemurafenib by targeting CCL2-induced miR-34a, miR-100 and miR-125b. Oncotarget. 2016;7:4428–41.
37.
38.
go back to reference Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, et al. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:549–55.CrossRefPubMed Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, et al. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:549–55.CrossRefPubMed
40.••
go back to reference Smith MP, Sanchez-Laorden B, O’Brien K, et al. The immune microenvironment confers resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors through macrophage-derived TNFalpha. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1214–29. Macrophages increase in number in response to BRAF inhibition and present a mechanism of resistance, described in this paper to be mediated by TNF-α.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith MP, Sanchez-Laorden B, O’Brien K, et al. The immune microenvironment confers resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors through macrophage-derived TNFalpha. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1214–29. Macrophages increase in number in response to BRAF inhibition and present a mechanism of resistance, described in this paper to be mediated by TNF-α.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Bradley SD, Chen Z, Melendez B, et al. BRAFV600E Co-opts a conserved MHC class i internalization pathway to diminish antigen presentation and CD8+ T-cell recognition of melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:602–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley SD, Chen Z, Melendez B, et al. BRAFV600E Co-opts a conserved MHC class i internalization pathway to diminish antigen presentation and CD8+ T-cell recognition of melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:602–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.•
go back to reference Callahan MK, Masters G, Pratilas CA, et al. Paradoxical activation of T cells via augmented ERK signaling mediated by a RAF inhibitor. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:70–9. BRAF inhibition directly activates T cells through pardoxical MAPK activation.CrossRefPubMed Callahan MK, Masters G, Pratilas CA, et al. Paradoxical activation of T cells via augmented ERK signaling mediated by a RAF inhibitor. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:70–9. BRAF inhibition directly activates T cells through pardoxical MAPK activation.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Wilmott JS, Long GV, Howle JR, et al. Selective BRAF inhibitors induce marked T-cell infiltration into human metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1386–94.CrossRefPubMed Wilmott JS, Long GV, Howle JR, et al. Selective BRAF inhibitors induce marked T-cell infiltration into human metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1386–94.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, Juneja VR, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with increased clonality in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e26615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, Juneja VR, et al. BRAF inhibition is associated with increased clonality in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e26615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.•
go back to reference Ott PA, Henry T, Baranda SJ, et al. Inhibition of both BRAF and MEK in BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma restores compromised dendritic cell (DC) function while having differential direct effects on DC properties. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:811–22. BRAF mutated cells suppress DC function which is reversed with BRAF/MEK inhibition.CrossRefPubMed Ott PA, Henry T, Baranda SJ, et al. Inhibition of both BRAF and MEK in BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma restores compromised dendritic cell (DC) function while having differential direct effects on DC properties. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:811–22. BRAF mutated cells suppress DC function which is reversed with BRAF/MEK inhibition.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Vella LJ, Andrews MC, Pasam A, et al. The kinase inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib affect isolated immune cell populations. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e946367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vella LJ, Andrews MC, Pasam A, et al. The kinase inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib affect isolated immune cell populations. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e946367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Vella LJ, Pasam A, Dimopoulos N, et al. MEK inhibition, alone or in combination with BRAF inhibition, affects multiple functions of isolated normal human lymphocytes and dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:351–60.CrossRefPubMed Vella LJ, Pasam A, Dimopoulos N, et al. MEK inhibition, alone or in combination with BRAF inhibition, affects multiple functions of isolated normal human lymphocytes and dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:351–60.CrossRefPubMed
48.•
go back to reference Ferrari de Andrade L, Ngiow SF, Stannard K, et al. Natural killer cells are essential for the ability of BRAF inhibitors to control BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7298–308. NK cells are a mediator of BRAF inhibitor response and present a possible target in designing future combination therapies.CrossRefPubMed Ferrari de Andrade L, Ngiow SF, Stannard K, et al. Natural killer cells are essential for the ability of BRAF inhibitors to control BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7298–308. NK cells are a mediator of BRAF inhibitor response and present a possible target in designing future combination therapies.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Sottile R, Pangigadde PN, Tan T, et al. HLA class I downregulation is associated with enhanced NK-cell killing of melanoma cells with acquired drug resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:409–19.CrossRefPubMed Sottile R, Pangigadde PN, Tan T, et al. HLA class I downregulation is associated with enhanced NK-cell killing of melanoma cells with acquired drug resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:409–19.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Koya RC, Mok S, Otte N, et al. BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib improves the antitumor activity of adoptive cell immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3928–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koya RC, Mok S, Otte N, et al. BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib improves the antitumor activity of adoptive cell immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3928–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Hooijkaas A, Gadiot J, Morrow M, et al. Selective BRAF inhibition decreases tumor-resident lymphocyte frequencies in a mouse model of human melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:609–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hooijkaas A, Gadiot J, Morrow M, et al. Selective BRAF inhibition decreases tumor-resident lymphocyte frequencies in a mouse model of human melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:609–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Liu L, Mayes PA, Eastman S, et al. The BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib: effects on immune function and in combination with immunomodulatory antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1639–51.CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Mayes PA, Eastman S, et al. The BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib: effects on immune function and in combination with immunomodulatory antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1639–51.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Puzanov I. Combining targeted and immunotherapy: BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) +/- the MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) for V600E/K mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM). J Transl Med. 2015;13 Suppl 1:K8.CrossRefPubMedCentral Puzanov I. Combining targeted and immunotherapy: BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) +/- the MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) for V600E/K mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM). J Transl Med. 2015;13 Suppl 1:K8.CrossRefPubMedCentral
54.••
go back to reference Ribas A, Hodi FS, Callahan M, et al. Hepatotoxicity with combination of vemurafenib and ipilimumab. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1365–6. The first phase 1 trial to report tolerability of combination targeted and checkpoint blockade showed unexpected grade 3 hepatotoxicity and highlighted the need for closer monitoring in combination clinical trials. Trial was closed early due to 7/12 patients developing grade 3 hepatotoxicity to combination vemurafenib and ipilimumab.CrossRefPubMed Ribas A, Hodi FS, Callahan M, et al. Hepatotoxicity with combination of vemurafenib and ipilimumab. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1365–6. The first phase 1 trial to report tolerability of combination targeted and checkpoint blockade showed unexpected grade 3 hepatotoxicity and highlighted the need for closer monitoring in combination clinical trials. Trial was closed early due to 7/12 patients developing grade 3 hepatotoxicity to combination vemurafenib and ipilimumab.CrossRefPubMed
55.••
go back to reference Ribas A, Butler M, Lutsky J, Lawrence DP, Robert C, et al. Phase I study combining anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) with BRAF (dabrafenib) and/or MEK (trametinib) inhibitors in advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3003. This phase 1 clinical trial is first study to demonstrate tolerability and efficacy with combination of MAPK targeted therapy and immunotherapy against PD-1/PD-L1 axis. High response rates and disease control rates were seen with combination BRAF and MEK inhibition along with anti-PD-L1 antibody with preliminary evidence of durable response.CrossRef Ribas A, Butler M, Lutsky J, Lawrence DP, Robert C, et al. Phase I study combining anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) with BRAF (dabrafenib) and/or MEK (trametinib) inhibitors in advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3003. This phase 1 clinical trial is first study to demonstrate tolerability and efficacy with combination of MAPK targeted therapy and immunotherapy against PD-1/PD-L1 axis. High response rates and disease control rates were seen with combination BRAF and MEK inhibition along with anti-PD-L1 antibody with preliminary evidence of durable response.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Amin A LD, Salama AK, Koon HB, et al. A single-arm, open-label, phase II study to evaluate the safety of vemurafenib (VEM) followed by ipilimumab (IPI) in BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (suppl; abstr 9032). Amin A LD, Salama AK, Koon HB, et al. A single-arm, open-label, phase II study to evaluate the safety of vemurafenib (VEM) followed by ipilimumab (IPI) in BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (suppl; abstr 9032).
57.
go back to reference Wargo JA, Lawrence DP, Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, et al. A phase II study of combined therapy with vemurafenib (vem) and high-dose interleukin-2 (aldesleukin; HD IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33, e20074. Wargo JA, Lawrence DP, Cooper ZA, Frederick DT, et al. A phase II study of combined therapy with vemurafenib (vem) and high-dose interleukin-2 (aldesleukin; HD IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33, e20074.
58.
go back to reference Puzanov I, Callahan MK, Linette GP. Phase 1 study of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) with or without the MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) for V600E/K mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(suppl; abstr 2511):5s. Puzanov I, Callahan MK, Linette GP. Phase 1 study of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) with or without the MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) for V600E/K mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(suppl; abstr 2511):5s.
59.••
go back to reference Ackerman A, Klein O, McDermott DF, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy prior to or after BRAF inhibitors. Cancer. 2014;120:1695–701. This retrospective study of 274 metastatic melanoma patients treated with sequential BRAF targeted and immunotherapy suggests that treating with immunotherapy at time of BRAF inhibitor resistance is unlikely to be of clinical benefit.CrossRefPubMed Ackerman A, Klein O, McDermott DF, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy prior to or after BRAF inhibitors. Cancer. 2014;120:1695–701. This retrospective study of 274 metastatic melanoma patients treated with sequential BRAF targeted and immunotherapy suggests that treating with immunotherapy at time of BRAF inhibitor resistance is unlikely to be of clinical benefit.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Das Thakur M, Salangsang F, Landman AS, et al. Modelling vemurafenib resistance in melanoma reveals a strategy to forestall drug resistance. Nature. 2013;494:251–5.CrossRefPubMed Das Thakur M, Salangsang F, Landman AS, et al. Modelling vemurafenib resistance in melanoma reveals a strategy to forestall drug resistance. Nature. 2013;494:251–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influences of BRAF Inhibitors on the Immune Microenvironment and the Rationale for Combined Molecular and Immune Targeted Therapy
Authors
Sangeetha M. Reddy
Alexandre Reuben
Jennifer A. Wargo
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Oncology Reports / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1523-3790
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0531-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Current Oncology Reports 7/2016 Go to the issue

Integrative Care (C Lammersfeld, Section Editor)

The Gut Microbiome and Obesity

Translational Oncology (L Vecchione, Section Editor)

Personalised Treatment in Gastric Cancer: Myth or Reality?

Integrative Care (C Lammersfeld, Section Editor)

The Use of Medical Marijuana in Cancer

Palliative Medicine (A Jatoi, Section Editor)

“The Talk:” Discussing Hospice Care

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine