Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors)

Personalizing Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Authors: Julia Quidde, Alexander Stein

Published in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Current systemic management of MCRC should include periods of intensive and less intensive treatment or even complete stop. Different systemic post-induction strategies have been evaluated in many trials. The aim of this article is to review the available data on maintenance strategies in MCRC and potential options to personalize choice of the respective strategy.

Recent Findings

Despite the large variability of clinical trials conducted in this setting, it can be concluded that intermittent chemotherapy does not seem to be inferior to continuous chemotherapy if at least 3 months of intensive induction treatment is applied, and active maintenance seem to be superior to complete stop after at least 3 months of induction treatment in terms of PFS and may add some benefit in terms of OS. The choice of the respective maintenance strategy may be personalized taking into account disease and patient characteristic, choice of induction treatment and response, treatment tolerability and quality of life.

Summary

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and no options of secondary resection or local ablation should be considered for a personalized maintenance approach.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Boffetta P, Levi F, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukaemias. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2016;27(4):725–31. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw022.CrossRef Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Boffetta P, Levi F, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukaemias. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2016;27(4):725–31. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdw022.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference • Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw235. The ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of expert recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in this rapidly evolving treatment setting. CrossRefPubMed • Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdw235. The ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of expert recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in this rapidly evolving treatment setting. CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lupi C, Sensi E, Lonardi S, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00122-9. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lupi C, Sensi E, Lonardi S, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(15)00122-9.
6.
7.
8.
go back to reference Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(10):1065–75. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(10):1065–75. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70330-4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–9.CrossRefPubMed Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, Ledermann JA, Seymour MT, Topham C, et al. Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):457–64.CrossRefPubMed Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, Ledermann JA, Seymour MT, Topham C, et al. Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):457–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Adams RA, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, Madi A, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent versus continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12(7):642–53. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70102-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adams RA, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, Madi A, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent versus continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12(7):642–53. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(11)70102-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, Lledo G, Flesch M, Buyse M, et al. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer—a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):394–400. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.0106.CrossRefPubMed Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, Lledo G, Flesch M, Buyse M, et al. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer—a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):394–400. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​03.​0106.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Labianca R, Sobrero A, Isa L, Cortesi E, Barni S, Nicolella D, et al. Intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised ‘GISCAD’ trial. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2011;22(5):1236–42. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq580.CrossRef Labianca R, Sobrero A, Isa L, Cortesi E, Barni S, Nicolella D, et al. Intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised ‘GISCAD’ trial. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2011;22(5):1236–42. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdq580.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Diaz-Rubio E, Gomez-Espana A, Massuti B, Sastre J, Abad A, Valladares M, et al. First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):15–25. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Diaz-Rubio E, Gomez-Espana A, Massuti B, Sastre J, Abad A, Valladares M, et al. First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):15–25. doi:10.​1634/​theoncologist.​2011-0249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, et al. Bevacizumab + capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial bevacizumab + XELOX treatment in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: phase III ‘Stop and Go’ study results—a Turkish oncology group trial. Oncology. 2013;85(6):328–35. doi:10.1159/000355914.CrossRefPubMed Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, et al. Bevacizumab + capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial bevacizumab + XELOX treatment in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: phase III ‘Stop and Go’ study results—a Turkish oncology group trial. Oncology. 2013;85(6):328–35. doi:10.​1159/​000355914.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pfeiffer P, Sorbye H, Qvortrup C, Karlberg M, Kersten C, Vistisen K, et al. Maintenance therapy with cetuximab every second week in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-7.5 study by the nordic colorectal cancer biomodulation group. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(3):170–6. doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2015.03.002.CrossRefPubMed Pfeiffer P, Sorbye H, Qvortrup C, Karlberg M, Kersten C, Vistisen K, et al. Maintenance therapy with cetuximab every second week in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-7.5 study by the nordic colorectal cancer biomodulation group. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(3):170–6. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clcc.​2015.​03.​002.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tveit KM, Guren T, Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P, Sorbye H, Pyrhonen S, et al. Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1755–62. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0915.CrossRefPubMed Tveit KM, Guren T, Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P, Sorbye H, Pyrhonen S, et al. Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1755–62. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2011.​38.​0915.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Mineur L, Andre T, Bennamoun M, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5727–33. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4344.CrossRefPubMed Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Mineur L, Andre T, Bennamoun M, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5727–33. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​23.​4344.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference • Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch colorectal cancer group. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1843–52. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. The CAIRO3 study was designed to determine the efficacy of maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus observation. It showed that maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab after six cycles of CAPOX-B in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs progression free survival and does not compromise quality of life. CrossRefPubMed • Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch colorectal cancer group. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1843–52. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(14)62004-3. The CAIRO3 study was designed to determine the efficacy of maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus observation. It showed that maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab after six cycles of CAPOX-B in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs progression free survival and does not compromise quality of life. CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Koeberle D, Betticher DC, von Moos R, Dietrich D, Brauchli P, Baertschi D, et al. Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06). Ann Oncol. 2015;26(4):709–14. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv011.CrossRefPubMed Koeberle D, Betticher DC, von Moos R, Dietrich D, Brauchli P, Baertschi D, et al. Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06). Ann Oncol. 2015;26(4):709–14. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv011.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference • Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmuller CA, Killing B, Depenbusch R, Steffens CC, et al. Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00042-X. Randomized trial investigating different maintenance strategies after first-line induction treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. An active maintenance treatment, either with a fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab or with bevacizumab alone, is associated with a longer progression free survival, but choice of maintenance or post-induction strategy does not affect overall survival. • Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmuller CA, Killing B, Depenbusch R, Steffens CC, et al. Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(15)00042-X. Randomized trial investigating different maintenance strategies after first-line induction treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. An active maintenance treatment, either with a fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab or with bevacizumab alone, is associated with a longer progression free survival, but choice of maintenance or post-induction strategy does not affect overall survival.
23.
go back to reference Stein A, Schwenke C, Folprecht G, Arnold D. Effect of application and intensity of Bevacizumab-based maintenance after induction chemotherapy with Bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(2):e29–39. doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.005.CrossRefPubMed Stein A, Schwenke C, Folprecht G, Arnold D. Effect of application and intensity of Bevacizumab-based maintenance after induction chemotherapy with Bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(2):e29–39. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clcc.​2015.​12.​005.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wasan H, Meade AM, Adams R, Wilson R, Pugh C, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):631–9. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70106-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wasan H, Meade AM, Adams R, Wilson R, Pugh C, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):631–9. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70106-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Tournigand C, Chibaudel B, Samson B, Scheithauer W, Vernerey D, Mesange P, et al. Bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (GERCOR DREAM; OPTIMOX3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1493–505. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00216-8.CrossRefPubMed Tournigand C, Chibaudel B, Samson B, Scheithauer W, Vernerey D, Mesange P, et al. Bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (GERCOR DREAM; OPTIMOX3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1493–505. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(15)00216-8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Johnsson A, Hagman H, Frodin JE, Berglund A, Keldsen N, Fernebro E, et al. A randomized phase III trial on maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with erlotinib after chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2335–41. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt236.CrossRefPubMed Johnsson A, Hagman H, Frodin JE, Berglund A, Keldsen N, Fernebro E, et al. A randomized phase III trial on maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with erlotinib after chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2335–41. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdt236.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Goey KKH, Elias SG, Van Tinteren H. Predictive value of KRAS mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with capecitabine and bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment vs observation in the phase III CAIRO3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl):abstr 3525. Goey KKH, Elias SG, Van Tinteren H. Predictive value of KRAS mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with capecitabine and bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment vs observation in the phase III CAIRO3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl):abstr 3525.
28.
go back to reference • Quidde J, Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmuller CA, Killing B, Depenbusch R, et al. Quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving maintenance therapy after first-line induction treatment: a preplanned analysis of the phase III AIO KRK 0207 trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(12):2203–10. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw425. This was one of the first studies analysing quality of life during maintenance treatment. The study showed that continuation of an active maintenance treatment with fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab after induction treatment was neither associated with a detrimental effect on health related quality of life when compared to bevacizumab alone or no active treatment. CrossRefPubMed • Quidde J, Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmuller CA, Killing B, Depenbusch R, et al. Quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving maintenance therapy after first-line induction treatment: a preplanned analysis of the phase III AIO KRK 0207 trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(12):2203–10. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdw425. This was one of the first studies analysing quality of life during maintenance treatment. The study showed that continuation of an active maintenance treatment with fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab after induction treatment was neither associated with a detrimental effect on health related quality of life when compared to bevacizumab alone or no active treatment. CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Personalizing Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Julia Quidde
Alexander Stein
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1556-3790
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-017-0365-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 3/2017 Go to the issue

Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Current Views on the Interval Between Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Systemic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer (RD Kim, Section Editor)

Anti-EGFR and Anti-VEGF Agents in First-Line Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Basic Science Foundations in Colorectal Cancer (J Roper, Section Editor)

Using 3D Organoid Cultures to Model Intestinal Physiology and Colorectal Cancer

Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Current Trends in the Use of Bowel Preparation for Colorectal Surgery

Radiation Therapy and Radiation Therapy Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (JY Wo, Section Editor)

Radiotherapy for the Primary Tumor in Patients with Metastatic Rectal Cancer

Radiation Therapy and Radiation Therapy Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (JY Wo, Section Editor)

Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine