Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors)

Are Gene Signatures Ready for Use in the Selection of Patients for Adjuvant Treatment?

Authors: Cristina Santos Vivas, Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona, Julieta Grasselli, Nuria Mulet-Margalef, Ramon Salazar Soler

Published in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy improves survival in stage III colon cancer patients in the adjuvant setting, whereas its clinical benefit in stage II is limited. Adjuvant therapy could be considered in patients with high-risk stage II disease, who are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy. Clinicopathological factors have been routinely used for risk stratification in stage II, as well as microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis, which has been recently incorporated in clinical guidelines as a prognostic marker. Other molecular markers, such as KRAS and BRAF mutations, suggested improving accuracy in prognostic classification in non-metastatic disease. Recent data derived from randomized clinical trial demonstrated that KRAS/BRAF gene mutations are associated with worse outcome depending on MSI status and tumor localization. Similarly, supervised gene expression signatures have refined recurrence risk stratification in several prospective studies although the clinical utility is still debatable. In this review, we focus on the new data on molecular and gene expression profiling in non metastatic colon cancer and the impact on prognostication and treatment decision.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2011;127(12):2893–917.CrossRef Ferlay J et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2011;127(12):2893–917.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andre T et al. Phase III study comparing a semimonthly with a monthly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for stage II and III colon cancer patients: final results of GERCOR C96.1. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3732–8.CrossRefPubMed Andre T et al. Phase III study comparing a semimonthly with a monthly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for stage II and III colon cancer patients: final results of GERCOR C96.1. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3732–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Andre T et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3109–16.CrossRefPubMed Andre T et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3109–16.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Benson 3rd AB et al. Localized colon cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(5):519–28. Benson 3rd AB et al. Localized colon cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(5):519–28.
5.
go back to reference Labianca R et al. Primary colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v70–7.CrossRefPubMed Labianca R et al. Primary colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v70–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Santos C et al. Molecular markers in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance in stage II colon cancer. Colorect Cancer. 2013;2(3):1–21.CrossRef Santos C et al. Molecular markers in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance in stage II colon cancer. Colorect Cancer. 2013;2(3):1–21.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gray RG et al. Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4611–9.CrossRefPubMed Gray RG et al. Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4611–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Salazar R et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;29(1):17–24.CrossRefPubMed Salazar R et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;29(1):17–24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kennedy RD et al. Development and independent validation of a prognostic assay for stage II colon cancer using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4620–6.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy RD et al. Development and independent validation of a prognostic assay for stage II colon cancer using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4620–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sargent DJ et al. Molecular testing for lymph node metastases as a determinant of colon cancer recurrence: results from a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(16):4361–9.CrossRefPubMed Sargent DJ et al. Molecular testing for lymph node metastases as a determinant of colon cancer recurrence: results from a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(16):4361–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C et al. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(10):1466–75.CrossRefPubMed Bokemeyer C et al. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(10):1466–75.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Douillard JY et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4697–705.CrossRefPubMed Douillard JY et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4697–705.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):692–700.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):692–700.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Douillard JY et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):1023–34.CrossRefPubMed Douillard JY et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):1023–34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taieb J et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage III colon cancer (PETACC-8): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):862–73.CrossRefPubMed Taieb J et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage III colon cancer (PETACC-8): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):862–73.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sinicrope FA et al. Prognostic impact of deficient DNA mismatch repair in patients with stage III colon cancer from a randomized trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3664–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinicrope FA et al. Prognostic impact of deficient DNA mismatch repair in patients with stage III colon cancer from a randomized trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3664–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Yoon HH et al. KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in relation to disease-free survival in BRAF-wild-type stage III colon cancers from an adjuvant chemotherapy trial (N0147 alliance). Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(11):3033–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoon HH et al. KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in relation to disease-free survival in BRAF-wild-type stage III colon cancers from an adjuvant chemotherapy trial (N0147 alliance). Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(11):3033–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Taieb J, et al. Prognostic value of BRAF V600E and KRAS exon 2 mutations in microsatellite stable (MSS), stage III colon cancers (CC) from patients (pts) treated with adjuvant FOLFOX+/- cetuximab: A pooled analysis of 3934 pts from the PETACC8 and N0147 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33 suppl:abstr 3507. Taieb J, et al. Prognostic value of BRAF V600E and KRAS exon 2 mutations in microsatellite stable (MSS), stage III colon cancers (CC) from patients (pts) treated with adjuvant FOLFOX+/- cetuximab: A pooled analysis of 3934 pts from the PETACC8 and N0147 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33 suppl:abstr 3507.
21.
go back to reference Hutchins G et al. Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1261–70.CrossRefPubMed Hutchins G et al. Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1261–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Peeters M et al. Massively parallel tumor multigene sequencing to evaluate response to panitumumab in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(7):1902–12.CrossRefPubMed Peeters M et al. Massively parallel tumor multigene sequencing to evaluate response to panitumumab in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(7):1902–12.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Oliner KS, Douillard JY, et al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in the phase III PRIME study of panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFOX versus FOLFOX as first-line treatment (tx) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 suppl:abstr 3511. Oliner KS, Douillard JY, et al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in the phase III PRIME study of panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFOX versus FOLFOX as first-line treatment (tx) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 suppl:abstr 3511.
24.
go back to reference Roth AD et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;28(3):466–74.CrossRefPubMed Roth AD et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;28(3):466–74.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Pietrantonio F et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(5):587–94.CrossRefPubMed Pietrantonio F et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(5):587–94.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;25 Suppl 3:iii1–9.CrossRef Van Cutsem E et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;25 Suppl 3:iii1–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sinicrope FA et al. Molecular markers identify subtypes of stage III colon cancer associated with patient outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2014;148(1):88–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinicrope FA et al. Molecular markers identify subtypes of stage III colon cancer associated with patient outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2014;148(1):88–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.••
go back to reference Sanz-Pamplona R et al. Clinical value of prognosis gene expression signatures in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48877. A systematic review of the gene expression signatures evaluated as pronostic tools in colon cancer.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sanz-Pamplona R et al. Clinical value of prognosis gene expression signatures in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48877. A systematic review of the gene expression signatures evaluated as pronostic tools in colon cancer.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Sveen A et al. Anticipating the clinical use of prognostic gene expression-based tests for colon cancer stage II and III: is Godot finally arriving? Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(24):6669–77.CrossRefPubMed Sveen A et al. Anticipating the clinical use of prognostic gene expression-based tests for colon cancer stage II and III: is Godot finally arriving? Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(24):6669–77.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang Y et al. Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1564–71.CrossRefPubMed Wang Y et al. Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1564–71.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487(7407):330-7. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487(7407):330-7.
33.
go back to reference Zhang JX et al. Prognostic and predictive value of a microRNA signature in stage II colon cancer: a microRNA expression analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1295–306.CrossRefPubMed Zhang JX et al. Prognostic and predictive value of a microRNA signature in stage II colon cancer: a microRNA expression analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1295–306.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kerr D et al. A quantitative multigene RT-PCR assay for prediction of recurrence in stage II colon cancer: Selection of the genes in four large studies and results of the independent, prospectively designed QUASAR validation study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts). 2009;27(15S):4000. Kerr D et al. A quantitative multigene RT-PCR assay for prediction of recurrence in stage II colon cancer: Selection of the genes in four large studies and results of the independent, prospectively designed QUASAR validation study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts). 2009;27(15S):4000.
36.
go back to reference Schepeler T et al. Diagnostic and prognostic microRNAs in stage II colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(15):6416–24.CrossRefPubMed Schepeler T et al. Diagnostic and prognostic microRNAs in stage II colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(15):6416–24.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Venook AP et al. Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1775–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Venook AP et al. Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1775–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.•
go back to reference Yothers G et al. Validation of the 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score in NSABP C-07 as a predictor of recurrence in patients with stage II and III colon cancer treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) and FU/LV plus oxaliplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(36):4512–9. The largest validation study of OncotypeDx in a patient population included in a randomized clinical trial.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yothers G et al. Validation of the 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score in NSABP C-07 as a predictor of recurrence in patients with stage II and III colon cancer treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) and FU/LV plus oxaliplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(36):4512–9. The largest validation study of OncotypeDx in a patient population included in a randomized clinical trial.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Yothers G, et al. Oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: updated results of NSABP C-07 trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3768–74. Yothers G, et al. Oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: updated results of NSABP C-07 trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3768–74.
40.•
go back to reference Srivastava G et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of oncotype DX colon cancer assay results on treatment recommendations in stage II colon cancer patients. Oncologist. 2014;19(5):492–7. The only clinical trial evaluating the impact of the gene expression signature results on treatment decision in stage II colon cancer.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Srivastava G et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of oncotype DX colon cancer assay results on treatment recommendations in stage II colon cancer patients. Oncologist. 2014;19(5):492–7. The only clinical trial evaluating the impact of the gene expression signature results on treatment decision in stage II colon cancer.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Reimers MS, et al. Validation of the 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score as a predictor of recurrence risk in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):1–8. Reimers MS, et al. Validation of the 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score as a predictor of recurrence risk in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):1–8.
42.
go back to reference Niedzwiecki D, et al. Association between ColDx assay result and recurrence-free interval in stage II colon cancer patients on CALGB (Alliance) 9581. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 suppl 3:abstr 455. Niedzwiecki D, et al. Association between ColDx assay result and recurrence-free interval in stage II colon cancer patients on CALGB (Alliance) 9581. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 suppl 3:abstr 455.
43.•
go back to reference Kopetz S et al. Genomic classifier ColoPrint predicts recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer patients more accurately than clinical factors. Oncologist. 2015;20(2):127–33. Results derived from a pooled dataset of stage II colon cancer which validates the prognostic value of ColoPrint.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kopetz S et al. Genomic classifier ColoPrint predicts recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer patients more accurately than clinical factors. Oncologist. 2015;20(2):127–33. Results derived from a pooled dataset of stage II colon cancer which validates the prognostic value of ColoPrint.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Salazar R, et al. Comparison of ColoPrint risk classification with clinical risk in the prospective PARSC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5s, suppl; abstr 3562). Salazar R, et al. Comparison of ColoPrint risk classification with clinical risk in the prospective PARSC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5s, suppl; abstr 3562).
45.
go back to reference Lenehan PF, et al. Generation and external validation of a tumor-derived 5-gene prognostic signature for recurrence of lymph node-negative, invasive colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(21):5234–44. Lenehan PF, et al. Generation and external validation of a tumor-derived 5-gene prognostic signature for recurrence of lymph node-negative, invasive colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(21):5234–44.
46.
go back to reference Van Laar RK. An online gene expression assay for determining adjuvant therapy eligibility in patients with stage 2 or 3 colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(12):1852–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Laar RK. An online gene expression assay for determining adjuvant therapy eligibility in patients with stage 2 or 3 colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(12):1852–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Di Narzo AF et al. Test of four colon cancer risk-scores in formalin fixed paraffin embedded microarray gene expression data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(10). Study analysing the prognostic value of four different classifiers in the same cohort of patients. Di Narzo AF et al. Test of four colon cancer risk-scores in formalin fixed paraffin embedded microarray gene expression data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(10). Study analysing the prognostic value of four different classifiers in the same cohort of patients.
48.•
49.
go back to reference Guinney, J, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015. Guinney, J, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015.
50.
go back to reference Des Guetz G et al. Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(10):1890–6.CrossRefPubMed Des Guetz G et al. Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(10):1890–6.CrossRefPubMed
51.••
go back to reference Salazar R, Tabernero J. New approaches but the same flaws in the search for prognostic signatures. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(8):2019–22. Critical overview of the steps for developing and validating prognostic multigene classifiers.CrossRefPubMed Salazar R, Tabernero J. New approaches but the same flaws in the search for prognostic signatures. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(8):2019–22. Critical overview of the steps for developing and validating prognostic multigene classifiers.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Are Gene Signatures Ready for Use in the Selection of Patients for Adjuvant Treatment?
Authors
Cristina Santos Vivas
Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona
Julieta Grasselli
Nuria Mulet-Margalef
Ramon Salazar Soler
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1556-3790
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-016-0305-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 1/2016 Go to the issue

Translational Colorectal Oncology (Y Jiang, Section Editor)

The Outlook for Immune Checkpoint Targeting Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors)

Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Care in Older Patients

Prevention and Early Detection (R Benamouzig, Section Editor)

Is Curcumin a Chemopreventive Agent for Colorectal Cancer?

Prevention and Early Detection (R Benamouzig, Section Editor)

How Can We Improve Adenoma Detection Rate?

Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors)

Aspirin and Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Is It for Everyone?

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine