Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Head and Neck Cancer (J-P Machiels, Section Editor)

Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Early Oropharyngeal Tumors: a Never-Ending Debate

Authors: Yan Monnier, MD-PhD, Christian Simon, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Opinion statement

Therapeutic options for early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) include both surgery and radiotherapy as single treatment modality. Retrospective data reporting on locoregional control and survival rates in early stage OPSCC have shown equivalent efficacy, although no prospective randomized trials are available to confirm these results. Given the assumed comparable oncologic results in both groups, complication rates and functional outcomes associated with each modality play a major role when making treatment decisions. Radiotherapy is used preferentially in many centers because few trials have reported higher complication rates in surgical patients. However, these adverse effects were mainly due to traditional invasive open surgical approaches used for access to the oropharynx. In order to decrease the morbidity of these techniques, transoral surgical (TOS) approaches have been developed progressively. They include transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and conventional transoral techniques. Meta-analysis comparing these new approaches with radiotherapy showed equivalent efficacy in terms of oncologic results. Furthermore, studies reporting on functional outcomes in patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC did not show major long-term functional impairment following treatment. Given the abovementioned statements, it is our practice to treat early stage OPSCC as follows: whenever a single modality treatment seems feasible (T1–2 and N0–1), we advocate TOS resection of the primary tumor associated with selective neck dissection, as indicated. In our opinion, the advantage of this approach relies on the possibility to stratify the risk of disease progression based on the pathological features of the tumor. Depending on the results, adjuvant radiation treatment or chemoradiotherapy can be chosen for high-risk patients. For tumors without adverse features, no adjuvant treatment is given. This approach also allows prevention of potential radiation-induced late complications while keeping radiotherapy as an option for any second primary lesions whenever needed. Definitive radiotherapy is generally reserved for selected patients with specific anatomical location associated with poor functional outcome following surgery, such as tumor of the soft palate, or for patients with severe comorbidities that do not allow surgical treatment.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sturgis EM, Ang KK. The epidemic of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is here: is it time to change our treatment paradigms? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(6):665–73. Sturgis EM, Ang KK. The epidemic of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is here: is it time to change our treatment paradigms? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(6):665–73.
3.
go back to reference Mehanna H, Olaleye O, Licitra L. Oropharyngeal cancer—is it time to change management according to human papilloma virus status? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(2):120–4.PubMedCrossRef Mehanna H, Olaleye O, Licitra L. Oropharyngeal cancer—is it time to change management according to human papilloma virus status? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(2):120–4.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parsons JT et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2967–80.PubMedCrossRef Parsons JT et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2967–80.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hinni ML, Nagel T, Howard B. Oropharyngeal cancer treatment: the role of transoral surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(2):132–8.PubMedCrossRef Hinni ML, Nagel T, Howard B. Oropharyngeal cancer treatment: the role of transoral surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(2):132–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rennemo E, Zatterstrom U, Boysen M. Impact of second primary tumors on survival in head and neck cancer: an analysis of 2,063 cases. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(8):1350–6.PubMedCrossRef Rennemo E, Zatterstrom U, Boysen M. Impact of second primary tumors on survival in head and neck cancer: an analysis of 2,063 cases. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(8):1350–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ho AS et al. Decision making in the management of recurrent head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36(1):144–51.PubMedCrossRef Ho AS et al. Decision making in the management of recurrent head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36(1):144–51.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Morris LG et al. Second primary cancers after an index head and neck cancer: subsite-specific trends in the era of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):739–46.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morris LG et al. Second primary cancers after an index head and neck cancer: subsite-specific trends in the era of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):739–46.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peck BW et al. Low risk of second primary malignancies among never smokers with human papillomavirus-associated index oropharyngeal cancers. Head Neck. 2013;35(6):794–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peck BW et al. Low risk of second primary malignancies among never smokers with human papillomavirus-associated index oropharyngeal cancers. Head Neck. 2013;35(6):794–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.•
go back to reference Hinni ML, Zarka MA, Hoxworth JM. Margin mapping in transoral surgery for head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1190–8. This is an article reporting on the average size of surgical margins and the oncologic outcomes obtained with TLM and margin mapping techniques.PubMedCrossRef Hinni ML, Zarka MA, Hoxworth JM. Margin mapping in transoral surgery for head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1190–8. This is an article reporting on the average size of surgical margins and the oncologic outcomes obtained with TLM and margin mapping techniques.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cohen MA et al. Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: oncologic results. Head Neck. 2011;33(4):573–80.PubMedCrossRef Cohen MA et al. Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: oncologic results. Head Neck. 2011;33(4):573–80.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grant DG et al. Oropharyngeal cancer: a case for single modality treatment with transoral laser microsurgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(12):1225–30.PubMedCrossRef Grant DG et al. Oropharyngeal cancer: a case for single modality treatment with transoral laser microsurgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(12):1225–30.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Haughey BH et al. Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Head Neck. 2011;33(12):1683–94.PubMedCrossRef Haughey BH et al. Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Head Neck. 2011;33(12):1683–94.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haughey BH, Sinha P. Prognostic factors and survival unique to surgically treated p16+ oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2012;122 Suppl 2:S13–33.PubMedCrossRef Haughey BH, Sinha P. Prognostic factors and survival unique to surgically treated p16+ oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2012;122 Suppl 2:S13–33.PubMedCrossRef
15.•
go back to reference Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery and adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal carcinomas and the influence of p16 INK4a on treatment outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):635–40. This is a review reporting on the oncologic outcomes between HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC treated with TORS.PubMedCrossRef Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery and adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal carcinomas and the influence of p16 INK4a on treatment outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):635–40. This is a review reporting on the oncologic outcomes between HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC treated with TORS.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen MM et al. Transoral robotic surgery: a population-level analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(6):968–75.PubMedCrossRef Chen MM et al. Transoral robotic surgery: a population-level analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(6):968–75.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference de Almeida JR et al. A systematic review of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy for early oropharynx cancer: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2096–102.PubMedCrossRef de Almeida JR et al. A systematic review of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy for early oropharynx cancer: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2096–102.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kelly K et al. Oncologic, functional and surgical outcomes of primary transoral robotic surgery for early squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(8):696–703.PubMedCrossRef Kelly K et al. Oncologic, functional and surgical outcomes of primary transoral robotic surgery for early squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(8):696–703.PubMedCrossRef
19.••
go back to reference Morisod, B. and C. Simon, A meta-analysis on survival of patients treated with trans-oral surgery (TOS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC). Head Neck, 2014. doi:10.1002/hed.23995. This is a recent meta-analysis specifically addressing the question of oncologic outcomes in early stages OPSCC. The data show equivalent efficacy of both treatment modalities in terms of disease control. Morisod, B. and C. Simon, A meta-analysis on survival of patients treated with trans-oral surgery (TOS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC). Head Neck, 2014. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​23995. This is a recent meta-analysis specifically addressing the question of oncologic outcomes in early stages OPSCC. The data show equivalent efficacy of both treatment modalities in terms of disease control.
20.••
go back to reference Williams CE et al. Transoral laser resection versus lip-split mandibulotomy in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a case match study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(2):367–72. This is a retrospective study addressing the functional outcomes, rates of complications and cost of TOS approaches, as compared to traditional open surgical treatments of OPSCC.PubMedCrossRef Williams CE et al. Transoral laser resection versus lip-split mandibulotomy in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a case match study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(2):367–72. This is a retrospective study addressing the functional outcomes, rates of complications and cost of TOS approaches, as compared to traditional open surgical treatments of OPSCC.PubMedCrossRef
21.••
go back to reference Chen AM et al. Comparison of functional outcomes and quality of life between transoral surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2015;37(3):381–5. This is a case control study comparing functional outcomes between TOS approaches and definitive radiotherapy. It shows better recovery of function with TOS.PubMedCrossRef Chen AM et al. Comparison of functional outcomes and quality of life between transoral surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2015;37(3):381–5. This is a case control study comparing functional outcomes between TOS approaches and definitive radiotherapy. It shows better recovery of function with TOS.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Genden EM et al. Transoral robotic resection and reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1668–74.PubMedCrossRef Genden EM et al. Transoral robotic resection and reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1668–74.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grant DG et al. Carcinoma of the tongue base treated by transoral laser microsurgery, part one: Untreated tumors, a prospective analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(12):2150–5.PubMedCrossRef Grant DG et al. Carcinoma of the tongue base treated by transoral laser microsurgery, part one: Untreated tumors, a prospective analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(12):2150–5.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Leonhardt FD et al. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function. Head Neck. 2012;34(2):146–54.PubMedCrossRef Leonhardt FD et al. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function. Head Neck. 2012;34(2):146–54.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference More YI et al. Functional swallowing outcomes following transoral robotic surgery vs primary chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage oropharynx and supraglottis cancers. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(1):43–8.PubMedCrossRef More YI et al. Functional swallowing outcomes following transoral robotic surgery vs primary chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage oropharynx and supraglottis cancers. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(1):43–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sinclair CF et al. Patient-perceived and objective functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery for early oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(11):1112–6.PubMedCrossRef Sinclair CF et al. Patient-perceived and objective functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery for early oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(11):1112–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.••
go back to reference Hutcheson KA et al. Functional outcomes after TORS for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272((2):463–71. This is a recent meta-analysis specifically addressing the question of functional outcomes in OPSCC treated with TORS. It shows overall good functional results and identifies baseline function, TNM stage, primary tumor location in the base of tongue and adjuvant chemo radiation therapy as predictors of poor functional prognosis.PubMedCrossRef Hutcheson KA et al. Functional outcomes after TORS for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272((2):463–71. This is a recent meta-analysis specifically addressing the question of functional outcomes in OPSCC treated with TORS. It shows overall good functional results and identifies baseline function, TNM stage, primary tumor location in the base of tongue and adjuvant chemo radiation therapy as predictors of poor functional prognosis.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nichols AC et al. Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)—study protocol for a randomized phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:133.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nichols AC et al. Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)—study protocol for a randomized phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:133.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Diaz-Molina JP et al. Functional and oncological results of non-surgical vs surgical treatment in squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012;63(5):348–54.PubMedCrossRef Diaz-Molina JP et al. Functional and oncological results of non-surgical vs surgical treatment in squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012;63(5):348–54.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference de Almeida, J.R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery is cost-effective compared to (Chemo)radiotherapy for early t-classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-utility analysis. Head Neck, 2014. doi:10.1002/hed.23930. de Almeida, J.R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery is cost-effective compared to (Chemo)radiotherapy for early t-classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-utility analysis. Head Neck, 2014. doi:10.​1002/​hed.​23930.
31.
go back to reference Dombree M et al. Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(10):2825–34.PubMedCrossRef Dombree M et al. Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(10):2825–34.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dziegielewski PT et al. The mandibulotomy: friend or foe? Safety outcomes and literature review. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(12):2369–75.PubMedCrossRef Dziegielewski PT et al. The mandibulotomy: friend or foe? Safety outcomes and literature review. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(12):2369–75.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zafereo ME et al. Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction. Head Neck. 2010;32(8):1003–11.PubMedCrossRef Zafereo ME et al. Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction. Head Neck. 2010;32(8):1003–11.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tsue TT et al. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(7):731–7.PubMedCrossRef Tsue TT et al. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(7):731–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Seikaly H et al. Functional outcomes after primary oropharyngeal cancer resection and reconstruction with the radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(5):897–904.PubMedCrossRef Seikaly H et al. Functional outcomes after primary oropharyngeal cancer resection and reconstruction with the radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(5):897–904.PubMedCrossRef
36.••
go back to reference Lee SY et al. Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes after transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy versus conventional surgery for T1 to T3 tonsillar cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36(8):1138–45. This is a prospective study reporting on the functional and oncologic outcomes between TORS, conventional TOS approaches and open surgery in the management of OPSCC.It shows better rates of negative margins with TORS and better functional as well as faster recovery times with TOS techniques as compared with open approaches.PubMedCrossRef Lee SY et al. Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes after transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy versus conventional surgery for T1 to T3 tonsillar cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36(8):1138–45. This is a prospective study reporting on the functional and oncologic outcomes between TORS, conventional TOS approaches and open surgery in the management of OPSCC.It shows better rates of negative margins with TORS and better functional as well as faster recovery times with TOS techniques as compared with open approaches.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP. Patterns of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck. 1990;12(3):197–203.PubMedCrossRef Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP. Patterns of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck. 1990;12(3):197–203.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lim YC et al. Distributions of cervical lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal carcinoma: therapeutic implications for the N0 neck. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7):1148–52.PubMedCrossRef Lim YC et al. Distributions of cervical lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal carcinoma: therapeutic implications for the N0 neck. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7):1148–52.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kuntz AL, Weymuller Jr EA. Impact of neck dissection on quality of life. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(8):1334–8.PubMedCrossRef Kuntz AL, Weymuller Jr EA. Impact of neck dissection on quality of life. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(8):1334–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Terrell JE et al. Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(4):620–6.PubMedCrossRef Terrell JE et al. Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(4):620–6.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference O'Brien CJ, Nettle WJ, Lee KK. Changing trends in the management of carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(4):270–4.PubMedCrossRef O'Brien CJ, Nettle WJ, Lee KK. Changing trends in the management of carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(4):270–4.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Brown JS et al. Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap. Head Neck. 1997;19(6):524–34.PubMedCrossRef Brown JS et al. Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap. Head Neck. 1997;19(6):524–34.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lee N et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update. Head Neck. 2007;29(4):387–400.PubMedCrossRef Lee N et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update. Head Neck. 2007;29(4):387–400.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Holliday EB, Frank SJ. Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89(2):292–302.PubMedCrossRef Holliday EB, Frank SJ. Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89(2):292–302.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Braam PM et al. Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(3):659–64.PubMedCrossRef Braam PM et al. Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(3):659–64.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Gupta T et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104(3):343–8.PubMedCrossRef Gupta T et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104(3):343–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kam MK et al. Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(31):4873–9.PubMedCrossRef Kam MK et al. Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(31):4873–9.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Nutting CM et al. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(2):127–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nutting CM et al. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(2):127–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Monnier Y et al. Mandibular osteoradionecrosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: incidence and risk factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(5):726–32.PubMedCrossRef Monnier Y et al. Mandibular osteoradionecrosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: incidence and risk factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(5):726–32.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Peterson DE et al. Osteoradionecrosis in cancer patients: the evidence base for treatment-dependent frequency, current management strategies, and future studies. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(8):1089–98.PubMedCrossRef Peterson DE et al. Osteoradionecrosis in cancer patients: the evidence base for treatment-dependent frequency, current management strategies, and future studies. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(8):1089–98.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wetzels JW et al. Maximum mouth opening and trismus in 143 patients treated for oral cancer: a 1-year prospective study. Head Neck. 2014;36(12):1754–62.PubMedCrossRef Wetzels JW et al. Maximum mouth opening and trismus in 143 patients treated for oral cancer: a 1-year prospective study. Head Neck. 2014;36(12):1754–62.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Bensadoun RJ et al. A systematic review of trismus induced by cancer therapies in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(8):1033–8.PubMedCrossRef Bensadoun RJ et al. A systematic review of trismus induced by cancer therapies in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(8):1033–8.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Chao KS et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: impact of tumor volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(1):43–50.PubMedCrossRef Chao KS et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: impact of tumor volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(1):43–50.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Scott AS, Parr LA, Johnstone PA. Risk of cerebrovascular events after neck and supraclavicular radiotherapy: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90(2):163–5.PubMedCrossRef Scott AS, Parr LA, Johnstone PA. Risk of cerebrovascular events after neck and supraclavicular radiotherapy: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90(2):163–5.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Dorresteijn LD et al. Increased risk of ischemic stroke after radiotherapy on the neck in patients younger than 60 years. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):282–8.PubMedCrossRef Dorresteijn LD et al. Increased risk of ischemic stroke after radiotherapy on the neck in patients younger than 60 years. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):282–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Early Oropharyngeal Tumors: a Never-Ending Debate
Authors
Yan Monnier, MD-PhD
Christian Simon, MD
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-015-0362-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 9/2015 Go to the issue

Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers (AB Benson, Section Editor)

Surgical Options in the Treatment of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine