Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Sarcomas (SH Okuno, Section Editor)

Adjuvant Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)

Authors: Paolo G. Casali, MD, Elena Fumagalli, MD, Alessandro Gronchi, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Opinion statement

Imatinib was proven to be effective for the adjuvant treatment of localized, surgically excised, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Currently, there is proof that it is able to delay relapse and prolong survival. An effect on cure rate of localized GIST is still to be proven, given the shape of relapse-free survival curves, which apparently tend to overlap after 2-3 years from completion of the adjuvant period. Although observation for a longer follow-up is needed, attempts to prolong adjuvant therapy beyond the currently standard 3 years have been made and the results are awaited. However, the impact of more prolonged adjuvant intervals on secondary resistance is unknown, so that standard practice is still 3 years in most institutions. The adjuvant choice should be based on a rather precise identification of the relapse risk of the single patient, reserving treatment to the high-risk subgroups. The choice also should be personalized on the basis of genotype: generally, PDGFRA D842V mutated and wild-type GIST are excluded. Additional results from completed trials on a longer follow-up are awaited to further refine such “precision” decision-making. There are several instances in which part of the “adjuvant” treatment may be administered preoperatively, even on the face of a surgically resectable GIST, to make surgery more limited and/or safer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blanke CD, et al. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(4):620–5.PubMedCrossRef Blanke CD, et al. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(4):620–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Verweij J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9440):1127–34.PubMedCrossRef Verweij J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9440):1127–34.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blanke CD, et al. Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(4):626–32.PubMedCrossRef Blanke CD, et al. Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(4):626–32.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dematteo RP, et al. Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer. 2008;112(3):608–15.PubMedCrossRef Dematteo RP, et al. Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer. 2008;112(3):608–15.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Von Mehren M, et al. Follow-up results after 9 years (yrs) of the ongoing, phase II B2222 trial of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable KIT + gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10016. Von Mehren M, et al. Follow-up results after 9 years (yrs) of the ongoing, phase II B2222 trial of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable KIT + gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10016.
6.
go back to reference Van Glabbeke M, et al. Initial and late resistance to imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors are predicted by different prognostic factors: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Italian Sarcoma Group-Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5795–804.PubMedCrossRef Van Glabbeke M, et al. Initial and late resistance to imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors are predicted by different prognostic factors: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Italian Sarcoma Group-Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5795–804.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blesius A, et al. Who are the long responders to imatinib (IM) in patients with advanced GIST? Results of the BFR14 prospective French Sarcoma Group randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10048. Blesius A, et al. Who are the long responders to imatinib (IM) in patients with advanced GIST? Results of the BFR14 prospective French Sarcoma Group randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10048.
8.••
go back to reference DeMatteo RP, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localized, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1097–104. The ACOSOG Z9001 was the first randomized trial to demonstrate a benefit for adjuvant therapy with imatinib. The convincing benefit was in terms of relapse-free survival, the primary end point of this study, given the current favorable prognosis of advanced GIST patients.PubMedCrossRef DeMatteo RP, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localized, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1097–104. The ACOSOG Z9001 was the first randomized trial to demonstrate a benefit for adjuvant therapy with imatinib. The convincing benefit was in terms of relapse-free survival, the primary end point of this study, given the current favorable prognosis of advanced GIST patients.PubMedCrossRef
9.••
go back to reference Joensuu H, et al. One vs. three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(12):1265–72. The SSG XVIII/AIO trial demonstrated a RFS benefit in favor of 3 years of adjuvant therapy in comparison to one year (tested in ACOSOG Z9001 trial). Even more importantly in a sense was the demonstration that this translated also in an OS improvement, thus proving that adjuvant targeted therapy is able to provide a survival benefit.PubMedCrossRef Joensuu H, et al. One vs. three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(12):1265–72. The SSG XVIII/AIO trial demonstrated a RFS benefit in favor of 3 years of adjuvant therapy in comparison to one year (tested in ACOSOG Z9001 trial). Even more importantly in a sense was the demonstration that this translated also in an OS improvement, thus proving that adjuvant targeted therapy is able to provide a survival benefit.PubMedCrossRef
10.•
go back to reference Le Cesne A, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after 3 years of treatment: an open-label multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2010;11(10):942–9. This trial randomized patients between continuing therapy and stopping it after 1, 3, and 5 years in the metastatic setting, and demonstrated that targeted therapy needs to be maintained indefinitely.PubMedCrossRef Le Cesne A, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after 3 years of treatment: an open-label multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2010;11(10):942–9. This trial randomized patients between continuing therapy and stopping it after 1, 3, and 5 years in the metastatic setting, and demonstrated that targeted therapy needs to be maintained indefinitely.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Domont J, et al. Influence of imatinib interruption and imatinib rechallenge on the residual tumor volume in patients with advanced GIST: results of the BFR14 prospective French Sarcoma Group randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10054. Domont J, et al. Influence of imatinib interruption and imatinib rechallenge on the residual tumor volume in patients with advanced GIST: results of the BFR14 prospective French Sarcoma Group randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(Suppl):10054.
12.
go back to reference Demetri GD, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1329–38.PubMedCrossRef Demetri GD, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1329–38.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reichardt P, et al. Response to imatinib rechallenge of GIST that recurs following completion of adjuvant imatinib treatment—the first analysis in the SSGXVIII/AIO trial patient population. ECCO-ESMO 2011 (Abstr 31LBA). Reichardt P, et al. Response to imatinib rechallenge of GIST that recurs following completion of adjuvant imatinib treatment—the first analysis in the SSGXVIII/AIO trial patient population. ECCO-ESMO 2011 (Abstr 31LBA).
14.
go back to reference Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23(2):70–83.PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23(2):70–83.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Joensuu H, et al. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(10):1411–9.PubMedCrossRef Joensuu H, et al. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(10):1411–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.•
go back to reference Gold JS, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2009;10(11):1045–52. A nomogram is provided to predict RFS after resection of localized primary GIST, based on tumor size, location, and mitotic index.PubMedCrossRef Gold JS, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2009;10(11):1045–52. A nomogram is provided to predict RFS after resection of localized primary GIST, based on tumor size, location, and mitotic index.PubMedCrossRef
17.•
go back to reference Rossi S, et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(11):1646–56. A retrospective analysis concerning the natural history of GIST developed a prognostic nomogram for survival that considers site, size, and mitotic index. The latter is shown to be a continuous variable, thus suggesting the opportunity to develop prognosticators for relapse-free survival exploiting the mitotic index as a continuous rather than a dichotomous variable.PubMedCrossRef Rossi S, et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(11):1646–56. A retrospective analysis concerning the natural history of GIST developed a prognostic nomogram for survival that considers site, size, and mitotic index. The latter is shown to be a continuous variable, thus suggesting the opportunity to develop prognosticators for relapse-free survival exploiting the mitotic index as a continuous rather than a dichotomous variable.PubMedCrossRef
18.•
go back to reference Hohenberger P, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97(12):1854–9. This study demonstrated that primary GIST patients with tumour rupture before or during resection have an exceedingly high risk of recurrence. These patients are clearly candidates for targeted therapy, whether it is conceived as an adjuvant or as therapy for already spread disease.PubMedCrossRef Hohenberger P, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97(12):1854–9. This study demonstrated that primary GIST patients with tumour rupture before or during resection have an exceedingly high risk of recurrence. These patients are clearly candidates for targeted therapy, whether it is conceived as an adjuvant or as therapy for already spread disease.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour: the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(10):890–6.PubMedCrossRef Rutkowski P, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour: the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(10):890–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Heinrich MC, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23):4342–9.PubMedCrossRef Heinrich MC, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23):4342–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martin-Broto J, et al. Prognostic time dependence of deletions affecting codons 557 and/or 558 of KIT gene for relapse-free survival (RFS) in localized GIST: a Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Study. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(7):1552–7.PubMedCrossRef Martin-Broto J, et al. Prognostic time dependence of deletions affecting codons 557 and/or 558 of KIT gene for relapse-free survival (RFS) in localized GIST: a Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Study. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(7):1552–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.•
go back to reference Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST). Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1247–53. This pooled analysis of data from the two randomized trials (EORTC62005 and ECOGS0033), comparing two doses of imatinib (400 vs. 800 mg daily) in patients with advanced GIST confirms a PFS advantage of high-dose imatinib among patients with KIT exon 9 mutations.CrossRef Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST). Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1247–53. This pooled analysis of data from the two randomized trials (EORTC62005 and ECOGS0033), comparing two doses of imatinib (400 vs. 800 mg daily) in patients with advanced GIST confirms a PFS advantage of high-dose imatinib among patients with KIT exon 9 mutations.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Corless CL, et al. PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(23):5357–64.PubMedCrossRef Corless CL, et al. PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(23):5357–64.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lasota J, et al. Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology. 2008;53(3):245–66.PubMedCrossRef Lasota J, et al. Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology. 2008;53(3):245–66.PubMedCrossRef
25.•
go back to reference Emile JF, et al. Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRAmutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs. Med Oncol. 2011; Sep 28 [Epub ahead of print]. This population-based series shows that the frequency of PDGFRA mutations (including the insensitive mutation PDGFRA D842V) in the localized setting is higher than observed in advanced series (given its better prognosis, although in the face of its insensitivity to targeted therapy). Emile JF, et al. Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRAmutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs. Med Oncol. 2011; Sep 28 [Epub ahead of print]. This population-based series shows that the frequency of PDGFRA mutations (including the insensitive mutation PDGFRA D842V) in the localized setting is higher than observed in advanced series (given its better prognosis, although in the face of its insensitivity to targeted therapy).
26.
go back to reference Carney JA, et al. Familial paraganglioma and gastric stromal sarcoma: a new syndrome distinct from the Carney triad. Am J Med Genet. 2002;108(2):132–9.PubMedCrossRef Carney JA, et al. Familial paraganglioma and gastric stromal sarcoma: a new syndrome distinct from the Carney triad. Am J Med Genet. 2002;108(2):132–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(1):90–6.PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(1):90–6.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mussi C, et al. Therapeutic consequences from molecular biology for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(14):4550–5.PubMedCrossRef Mussi C, et al. Therapeutic consequences from molecular biology for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(14):4550–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 44 cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1373–81.PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 44 cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1373–81.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Agaram P, et al. Molecular characterization of pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):3204–15.PubMedCrossRef Agaram P, et al. Molecular characterization of pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):3204–15.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fiore M, et al. Preoperative imatinib mesylate for unresectable or locally advanced primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Eur J Sur Oncol. 2009;35(7):739–45.CrossRef Fiore M, et al. Preoperative imatinib mesylate for unresectable or locally advanced primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Eur J Sur Oncol. 2009;35(7):739–45.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wang D, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumors: long-term follow-up results of radiation therapy oncology group 0132. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; Mar 7 [Epub ahead of print]. Wang D, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumors: long-term follow-up results of radiation therapy oncology group 0132. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; Mar 7 [Epub ahead of print].
33.
go back to reference Gronchi A, et al. The combination of surgery and imatinib in GIST: a reality for localized tumors at high risk, an open issue for metastatic ones. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2191-4. Gronchi A, et al. The combination of surgery and imatinib in GIST: a reality for localized tumors at high risk, an open issue for metastatic ones. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-2191-4.
34.
go back to reference Choi H, et al. Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncologist. 2008;13(2):4–7.PubMedCrossRef Choi H, et al. Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncologist. 2008;13(2):4–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Van den Abbeele AD, et al. The lessons of GIST–PET and PET/CT: a new paradigm for imaging. Oncologist. 2008;13(2):8–13.PubMedCrossRef Van den Abbeele AD, et al. The lessons of GIST–PET and PET/CT: a new paradigm for imaging. Oncologist. 2008;13(2):8–13.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Haller F, et al. Surgical management after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with respect to imatinib resistance caused by secondary KIT mutations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):526–32.PubMedCrossRef Haller F, et al. Surgical management after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with respect to imatinib resistance caused by secondary KIT mutations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):526–32.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adjuvant Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
Authors
Paolo G. Casali, MD
Elena Fumagalli, MD
Alessandro Gronchi, MD
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-012-0198-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 3/2012 Go to the issue

Skin Cancer (WH Sharfman, Section Editor)

Adoptive Immunotherapy of Advanced Melanoma

Sarcomas (SH Okuno, Section Editor)

New Systemic Therapy Options for Advanced Sarcomas

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine