Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Current Concept Review

Current approaches to flexible intramedullary nailing for bone lengthening in children

Authors: Dmitry Popkov, Pierre Lascombes, Pierre Journeau, Arnold Popkov

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Limb-length discrepancies and extremity deformities are among the most common non-traumatic orthopaedic conditions for which children are hospitalised. There is a need to develop new treatment options for lower-limb length discrepancy in order to ameliorate treatment outcomes, avoid or reduce rates of complication and provide early rehabilitation. The authors report on the basic principles, experimental and clinical data, advantages, problems and complications of a combined technique associating the Ilizarov method and flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) in limb lengthening and deformity correction in children. They describe features of the use of hydroxyapatite-coated intramedullary nails in patients with certain metabolic bone disorders and in cases where bone consolidation has been compromised. The advantages of bone lengthening using a combined technique (circular fixator plus FIN) are a lower healing index, quicker distraction-consolidation, a reduced rate of septic and bone complications, the ability to correct deformities gradually and the increased stability of bone fragments during the external fixation period and after frame removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friend L, Widmann RF (2008) Advances in management of limb length discrepancy and lower limb deformity. Curr Opin Pediatr 20:46–51CrossRefPubMed Friend L, Widmann RF (2008) Advances in management of limb length discrepancy and lower limb deformity. Curr Opin Pediatr 20:46–51CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sabharwal S, Green S, McCarthy J, Hamdy RC (2011) What’s new in limb lengthening and deformity correction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:213–221CrossRef Sabharwal S, Green S, McCarthy J, Hamdy RC (2011) What’s new in limb lengthening and deformity correction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:213–221CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1464–1480CrossRef Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:1464–1480CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stevens P (2006) Guided growth: 1933 to the present. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 1:29–35CrossRef Stevens P (2006) Guided growth: 1933 to the present. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 1:29–35CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dammerer D, Kirschbichler K, Donnan L, Kaufmann G, Krismer M, Biedermann R (2011) Clinical value of the Taylor Spatial Frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and orthofix fixators. J Child Orthop 5:343–349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dammerer D, Kirschbichler K, Donnan L, Kaufmann G, Krismer M, Biedermann R (2011) Clinical value of the Taylor Spatial Frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and orthofix fixators. J Child Orthop 5:343–349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 250:8–26 Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 250:8–26
7.
go back to reference Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA (2013) The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop 37:1533–1539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA (2013) The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop 37:1533–1539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104 Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104
9.
go back to reference Saraph V, Roposch A, Zwick EB, Linhart WE (2004) Tibial lengthening over nails in children using modified Ender nails: preliminary results of a new treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B 13:383–388CrossRefPubMed Saraph V, Roposch A, Zwick EB, Linhart WE (2004) Tibial lengthening over nails in children using modified Ender nails: preliminary results of a new treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B 13:383–388CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Matsubara H, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Watanabe K, Tomita K (2006) Deformity correction and lengthening of lower legs with an external fixator. Int Orthop 30:550–554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matsubara H, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Watanabe K, Tomita K (2006) Deformity correction and lengthening of lower legs with an external fixator. Int Orthop 30:550–554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Launay F, Jouve JL, Guillaume JM, Viehweger E, Jacquemier M, Bollini G (2001) Progressive forearm lengthening in children: 14 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Rep Appar Mot 87:786–795 Launay F, Jouve JL, Guillaume JM, Viehweger E, Jacquemier M, Bollini G (2001) Progressive forearm lengthening in children: 14 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Rep Appar Mot 87:786–795
12.
go back to reference Popkov AV (1991) Errors and complications of operative lengtheningvof the lower extremities in adults by the Ilizarov method. VestnvKhir I I Grek 1:113–116 Popkov AV (1991) Errors and complications of operative lengtheningvof the lower extremities in adults by the Ilizarov method. VestnvKhir I I Grek 1:113–116
13.
go back to reference Antoci V, Ono CM, Antoci V Jr, Raney EM (2006) Bone lengthening in children: how to predict the complications rate and complexity? J Pediatr Orthop 26:634–640CrossRefPubMed Antoci V, Ono CM, Antoci V Jr, Raney EM (2006) Bone lengthening in children: how to predict the complications rate and complexity? J Pediatr Orthop 26:634–640CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Launay F, Younsi R, Pithioux M, Chabrand P, Bollini G, Jouve JL (2013) Fracture following lower limb lengthening in children: a series of 58 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:72–79CrossRefPubMed Launay F, Younsi R, Pithioux M, Chabrand P, Bollini G, Jouve JL (2013) Fracture following lower limb lengthening in children: a series of 58 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:72–79CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Moraal JM, Elzinga-Plomp A, Jongmans MJ, Roermund PM, Flikweert PE, Castelein RM, Sinnema G (2009) Long-term psychosocial functioning after Ilizarov limb lengthening during childhood. Acta Orthop 80:704–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moraal JM, Elzinga-Plomp A, Jongmans MJ, Roermund PM, Flikweert PE, Castelein RM, Sinnema G (2009) Long-term psychosocial functioning after Ilizarov limb lengthening during childhood. Acta Orthop 80:704–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Black SR, Kwon MS, Cherkashin AM, Samchukov ML, Birch JG, Jo CH (2015) Lengthening in congenital femoral deficiency: a comparison of circular external fixation and a motorized intramedullary nail. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:1432–1440CrossRef Black SR, Kwon MS, Cherkashin AM, Samchukov ML, Birch JG, Jo CH (2015) Lengthening in congenital femoral deficiency: a comparison of circular external fixation and a motorized intramedullary nail. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:1432–1440CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Krieg AH, Speth BM, Foster BK (2008) Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents: an alternative to external fixators? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:189–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krieg AH, Speth BM, Foster BK (2008) Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents: an alternative to external fixators? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:189–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Song HR, Oh CW, Mattoo R, Park BC, Kim SJ, Park IH, Jeon IH, Ihn JC (2005) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail using the external fixator: risk of infection and knee problems in 22 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or more. Acta Orthop 76:245–252CrossRefPubMed Song HR, Oh CW, Mattoo R, Park BC, Kim SJ, Park IH, Jeon IH, Ihn JC (2005) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail using the external fixator: risk of infection and knee problems in 22 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or more. Acta Orthop 76:245–252CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gordon JE, Goldfarb CA, Luhmann SJ, Lyons D, Schoenecker PL (2002) Femoral lengthening over a humeral intramedullary nail in preadolescent children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:930–937CrossRef Gordon JE, Goldfarb CA, Luhmann SJ, Lyons D, Schoenecker PL (2002) Femoral lengthening over a humeral intramedullary nail in preadolescent children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:930–937CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kristiansen L, Steen H (1999) Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand 70:271–274CrossRefPubMed Kristiansen L, Steen H (1999) Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand 70:271–274CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Herzenberg JE, Paley D (1997) Tibial lengthening over nails. Tech Orthop 12:250–259CrossRef Herzenberg JE, Paley D (1997) Tibial lengthening over nails. Tech Orthop 12:250–259CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schiedel F, Elsner U, Gosheger G, Vogt B, Rödl R (2013) Prophylactic titanium elastic nailing (TEN) following femoral lengthening (Lengthening then rodding) with one or two nails reduces the risk for secondary interventions after regenerate fractures: a cohort study in monolateral vs bilateral lengthening procedures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schiedel F, Elsner U, Gosheger G, Vogt B, Rödl R (2013) Prophylactic titanium elastic nailing (TEN) following femoral lengthening (Lengthening then rodding) with one or two nails reduces the risk for secondary interventions after regenerate fractures: a cohort study in monolateral vs bilateral lengthening procedures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Grill F, Dungl P, Steinwender G, Hosny G (1999) Congenital short femur. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 2:35–41CrossRef Grill F, Dungl P, Steinwender G, Hosny G (1999) Congenital short femur. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 2:35–41CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lascombes P (2010) Flexible intramedullary nailing in children. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Lascombes P (2010) Flexible intramedullary nailing in children. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shevtsov VI, Popkov AV, Popkov DA, Yerofeev SA, Prévot J, Lascombes P (2004) Embrochage centro-médullaire dans les allongements osseux selon Ilizarov. Rev Chir Orthop 90:399–410PubMed Shevtsov VI, Popkov AV, Popkov DA, Yerofeev SA, Prévot J, Lascombes P (2004) Embrochage centro-médullaire dans les allongements osseux selon Ilizarov. Rev Chir Orthop 90:399–410PubMed
26.
go back to reference Popkov DA, Popkov AV, Kononovich NA, Barbier D, Ceroni D, Journeau P, Lascombes P (2014) Experimental study of progressive tibial lengthening in dogs using the Ilizarov technique. Comparison with and without associated intramedullary K-wires. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:809–814CrossRefPubMed Popkov DA, Popkov AV, Kononovich NA, Barbier D, Ceroni D, Journeau P, Lascombes P (2014) Experimental study of progressive tibial lengthening in dogs using the Ilizarov technique. Comparison with and without associated intramedullary K-wires. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:809–814CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lascombes P, Huber H, Fay R, Popkov D, Haumont T, Journeau P (2013) Flexible intramedullary nailing in children: nail to medullary canal diameters optimal ratio. J Pediatr Orthop 33:403–408CrossRefPubMed Lascombes P, Huber H, Fay R, Popkov D, Haumont T, Journeau P (2013) Flexible intramedullary nailing in children: nail to medullary canal diameters optimal ratio. J Pediatr Orthop 33:403–408CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Burlakov EV, Alatov DV, Popkov DA, Shutov RB (2008) Calculation of the main parameters of spokes for intramedullary reinforcement of tubular bones. Med Tekh 3:26–28 Burlakov EV, Alatov DV, Popkov DA, Shutov RB (2008) Calculation of the main parameters of spokes for intramedullary reinforcement of tubular bones. Med Tekh 3:26–28
29.
go back to reference Popkov D, Popkov A, Haumont T, Journeau P, Lascombes P (2010) Flexible intramedullary nail use in limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 30:910–918CrossRefPubMed Popkov D, Popkov A, Haumont T, Journeau P, Lascombes P (2010) Flexible intramedullary nail use in limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 30:910–918CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lampasi M, Launay F, Jouve JL, Bollini G (2009) Femoral lengthening over elastic stable intramedullary nailing in children using the monolateral external fixator. Chir Org Mov 93:57–64 Lampasi M, Launay F, Jouve JL, Bollini G (2009) Femoral lengthening over elastic stable intramedullary nailing in children using the monolateral external fixator. Chir Org Mov 93:57–64
31.
go back to reference Bukva B, Brdar R, Nikolic D, Petronic I, Ducic S, Abramovic D (2013) Combined external fixation and intramedullary alignment in correction of limb length discrepancies. Acta Orthop Belg 79:411–416PubMed Bukva B, Brdar R, Nikolic D, Petronic I, Ducic S, Abramovic D (2013) Combined external fixation and intramedullary alignment in correction of limb length discrepancies. Acta Orthop Belg 79:411–416PubMed
32.
go back to reference Bukva B, Vrgoč G, Rakovac I, Dučić S, Sindik J, Čoklo M, Marinović M, Bakota B (2015) Complications in leg lengthening using an Ilizarov external fixator and intramedullary alignment in children: comparative study during a fourteen-year period. Injury 46(Suppl 6):S48–S51CrossRefPubMed Bukva B, Vrgoč G, Rakovac I, Dučić S, Sindik J, Čoklo M, Marinović M, Bakota B (2015) Complications in leg lengthening using an Ilizarov external fixator and intramedullary alignment in children: comparative study during a fourteen-year period. Injury 46(Suppl 6):S48–S51CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Popkov D, Journeau P, Popkov A, Haumont T, Lascombes P (2010) Ollier’s disease limb lenghtening: should intramedullary nailing be combined with circular external fixation? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:348–353CrossRefPubMed Popkov D, Journeau P, Popkov A, Haumont T, Lascombes P (2010) Ollier’s disease limb lenghtening: should intramedullary nailing be combined with circular external fixation? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:348–353CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Popkov A, Aranovich A, Popkov D (2015) Results of deformity correction in children with X-linked hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets by external fixation or combined technique. Int Orthop 39:2423–2431CrossRefPubMed Popkov A, Aranovich A, Popkov D (2015) Results of deformity correction in children with X-linked hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets by external fixation or combined technique. Int Orthop 39:2423–2431CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Popkov D, Popkov A (2016) Progressive lengthening of short congenital forearm stump in children for prosthetic fitting. Int Orthop 40:547–554CrossRefPubMed Popkov D, Popkov A (2016) Progressive lengthening of short congenital forearm stump in children for prosthetic fitting. Int Orthop 40:547–554CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Current approaches to flexible intramedullary nailing for bone lengthening in children
Authors
Dmitry Popkov
Pierre Lascombes
Pierre Journeau
Arnold Popkov
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0781-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2016 Go to the issue