Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Original Clinical Article

Ponseti method compared to previous treatment of clubfoot in Norway. A multicenter study of 205 children followed for 8–11 years

Authors: Christian Sætersdal, Jonas M. Fevang, John Asle Bjørlykke, Lars B. Engesæter

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Despite few studies comparing Ponseti treatment and traditional treatment of clubfoot (talipes equinovarus), the Ponseti method is now accepted as standard treatment for this deformity. The Ponseti method was introduced in Norway in 2003 and the purpose of this multicenter-study was to compare the results of Ponseti treatment with the results of the previous treatment for clubfoot in Norway.

Methods

90 children (134 clubfeet) treated with previous treatment (pre-Ponseti group), were compared to 115 Ponseti treated children (160 clubfeet) (Ponseti group). The previous treatment consisted of casting and surgery if needed. At 8–11 years of age, all children were examined by the same orthopaedic surgeon, the parents answered a questionnaire, all feet were X-rayed and information about surgical procedures was obtained from the patient records.

Results

The number of surgeries was higher in the pre-Ponseti group, and the number of extensive surgeries was 119 in the pre-Ponseti group compared to 19 in the Ponseti group. The range of motion in the ankle joint was better in the Ponseti group. Children in this group had better function, higher satisfaction and less pain according to patient and parent reported outcome measures. The incidence of moderate or severe talar flattening was higher in the pre-Ponseti group.

Conclusion

Ponseti treatment seems to be superior to the previous treatment in Norway, with regards to number and severity of operations, flexibility of the foot and ankle, parent/patient reported outcome and the presence of talar flattening on X-ray.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cooper DM, Dietz FR (1995) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(10):1477–1489 Cooper DM, Dietz FR (1995) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(10):1477–1489
4.
go back to reference Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R and Tudisco C (2003) Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(7):1286–1294 Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R and Tudisco C (2003) Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(7):1286–1294
5.
go back to reference Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV (1980) Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(1):23–31PubMed Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV (1980) Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(1):23–31PubMed
6.
go back to reference Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV (2004) Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 113(2):376–380CrossRefPubMed Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV (2004) Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 113(2):376–380CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Church C, Coplan JA, Poljak D, Thabet AM, Kowtharapu D, Lennon N, Marchesi S, Henley J, Starr R, Mason D, Belthur MV, Herzenberg JE, Miller F (2012) A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms. J Child Orthop 6(1):51–59. doi:10.1007/s11832-012-0387-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Church C, Coplan JA, Poljak D, Thabet AM, Kowtharapu D, Lennon N, Marchesi S, Henley J, Starr R, Mason D, Belthur MV, Herzenberg JE, Miller F (2012) A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms. J Child Orthop 6(1):51–59. doi:10.​1007/​s11832-012-0387-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Halanski MA, Davison JE, Huang JC, Walker CG, Walsh SJ, Crawford HA (2010) Ponseti method compared with surgical treatment of clubfoot: a prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):270–278. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01560 CrossRefPubMed Halanski MA, Davison JE, Huang JC, Walker CG, Walsh SJ, Crawford HA (2010) Ponseti method compared with surgical treatment of clubfoot: a prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):270–278. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​H.​01560 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N (2002) Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 22(4):517–521PubMed Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N (2002) Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 22(4):517–521PubMed
14.
go back to reference Smith PA, Kuo KN, Graf AN, Krzak J, Flanagan A, Hassani S, Caudill AK, Dietz FR, Morcuende J, Harris GF (2014) Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(4):1281–1290. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3386-8 CrossRefPubMed Smith PA, Kuo KN, Graf AN, Krzak J, Flanagan A, Hassani S, Caudill AK, Dietz FR, Morcuende J, Harris GF (2014) Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(4):1281–1290. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-013-3386-8 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nesse E, Terjesen T, Ronningen H (1996) Treatment of clubfoot. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke 116(18):2165–2168 Nesse E, Terjesen T, Ronningen H (1996) Treatment of clubfoot. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke 116(18):2165–2168
17.
go back to reference Aronson J, Puskarich CL (1990) Deformity and disability from treated clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 10(1):109–119CrossRefPubMed Aronson J, Puskarich CL (1990) Deformity and disability from treated clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 10(1):109–119CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Roye BD, Vitale MG, Gelijns AC, Roye DP Jr (2001) Patient-based outcomes after clubfoot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 21(1):42–49CrossRefPubMed Roye BD, Vitale MG, Gelijns AC, Roye DP Jr (2001) Patient-based outcomes after clubfoot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 21(1):42–49CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vitale MG, Choe JC, Vitale MA, Lee FY, Hyman JE, Roye DP Jr (2005) Patient-based outcomes following clubfoot surgery: a 16-year follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop 25(4):533–538CrossRefPubMed Vitale MG, Choe JC, Vitale MA, Lee FY, Hyman JE, Roye DP Jr (2005) Patient-based outcomes following clubfoot surgery: a 16-year follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop 25(4):533–538CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dunn HK, Samuelson KM (1974) Flat-top talus. A long-term report of twenty club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(1):57–62 Dunn HK, Samuelson KM (1974) Flat-top talus. A long-term report of twenty club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(1):57–62
22.
go back to reference Hutchins PM, Foster BK, Paterson DC, Cole EA (1985) Long-term results of early surgical release in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(5):791–799PubMed Hutchins PM, Foster BK, Paterson DC, Cole EA (1985) Long-term results of early surgical release in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(5):791–799PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hudson I, Catterall A (1994) Posterolateral release for resistant club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(2):281–284PubMed Hudson I, Catterall A (1994) Posterolateral release for resistant club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(2):281–284PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kumar PN, Laing PW, Klenerman L (1993) Medial calcaneal osteotomy for relapsed equinovarus deformity. Long-term study of the results of Frederick Dwyer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(6):967–971 Kumar PN, Laing PW, Klenerman L (1993) Medial calcaneal osteotomy for relapsed equinovarus deformity. Long-term study of the results of Frederick Dwyer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(6):967–971
25.
go back to reference McHale KA, Lenhart MK (1991) Treatment of residual clubfoot deformity–the “bean-shaped” foot–by opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy and closing wedge cuboid osteotomy. Clinical review and cadaver correlations. J Pediatr Orthop 11(3):374–381CrossRefPubMed McHale KA, Lenhart MK (1991) Treatment of residual clubfoot deformity–the “bean-shaped” foot–by opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy and closing wedge cuboid osteotomy. Clinical review and cadaver correlations. J Pediatr Orthop 11(3):374–381CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Haasbeek JF, Wright JG (1997) A comparison of the long-term results of posterior and comprehensive release in the treatment of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 17(1):29–35PubMed Haasbeek JF, Wright JG (1997) A comparison of the long-term results of posterior and comprehensive release in the treatment of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 17(1):29–35PubMed
28.
go back to reference Herbsthofer B, Eckardt A, Rompe JD, Kullmer K (1998) Significance of radiographic angle measurements in evaluation of congenital clubfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(6–7):324–329CrossRefPubMed Herbsthofer B, Eckardt A, Rompe JD, Kullmer K (1998) Significance of radiographic angle measurements in evaluation of congenital clubfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(6–7):324–329CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wynne-Davies R (1964) Talipes Equinovarus. A review of eighty-four cases after completion of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46:464–476PubMed Wynne-Davies R (1964) Talipes Equinovarus. A review of eighty-four cases after completion of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46:464–476PubMed
Metadata
Title
Ponseti method compared to previous treatment of clubfoot in Norway. A multicenter study of 205 children followed for 8–11 years
Authors
Christian Sætersdal
Jonas M. Fevang
John Asle Bjørlykke
Lars B. Engesæter
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0760-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2016 Go to the issue