Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Original Clinical Article

Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Sumeet Garg, Nikki Bloch, Micaela Cyr, Patrick Carry

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Radiographs are usually taken on day of pin removal for children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiographs taken at time of pin removal for patients recovering uneventfully alter management.

Methods

After IRB approval, billing records identified 1213 patients aged 1–10 years who underwent elbow surgery between 2007 and 2013 at our institution for a supracondylar humerus fracture. Of these patients, 389 met inclusion criteria. Clinical charts were reviewed for demographics, operative details, and clinical follow-up, focusing on clinical symptoms present at pin removal. Radiographs taken at time of pin removal and subsequent visits were assessed for healing and fracture alignment.

Results

In no case was pin removal delayed based on radiographs. One hundred and nineteen (31 %) patients had radiographs taken following pin removal; in no case was loss of reduction found among these patients. No cases of neurologic or vascular injury, re-fracture, or loss of reduction occurred. Infection occurred in 12 patients (3 %). Pins were kept in place for 23.8 ± 4.4 days. Eighty-six patients (22 %) had additional intervention after pin removal (cast application in all cases). Of 389 patients, 75 (19 %) had no documented reason for extended casting, four (1 %) were extended based on physician evaluation of radiographs, and seven (2 %) were extended for other reasons.

Conclusions

Elimination of radiographs at time of pin removal should be considered. If continuing to obtain radiographs at pin removal, we recommend removing pins before taking radiographs to reduce patient fear and anxiety from visualizing percutaneous pins.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Larson AN, G.S. et al, Type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures: does time to surgery matter?, in pediatric orthopaedic society of North America (2011) Annual conference 2011: Montreal. Quebec, Canada Larson AN, G.S. et al, Type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures: does time to surgery matter?, in pediatric orthopaedic society of North America (2011) Annual conference 2011: Montreal. Quebec, Canada
2.
go back to reference O’Hara LJ, Barlow JW, Clarke NM (2000) Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. audit changes practice. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82(2):204–210CrossRef O’Hara LJ, Barlow JW, Clarke NM (2000) Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. audit changes practice. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82(2):204–210CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Parikh SN et al (2004) Displaced type II extension supracondylar humerus fractures: do they all need pinning? J Pediatr Orthop 24(4):380–384CrossRefPubMed Parikh SN et al (2004) Displaced type II extension supracondylar humerus fractures: do they all need pinning? J Pediatr Orthop 24(4):380–384CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Skaggs DL et al (2008) How safe is the operative treatment of Gartland type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children? J Pediatr Orthop 28(2):139–141CrossRefPubMed Skaggs DL et al (2008) How safe is the operative treatment of Gartland type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children? J Pediatr Orthop 28(2):139–141CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL (2008) Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(5):1121–1132CrossRef Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL (2008) Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(5):1121–1132CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ponce BA et al (2004) Complications and timing of follow-up after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: follow-up after percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 24(6):610–614CrossRefPubMed Ponce BA et al (2004) Complications and timing of follow-up after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: follow-up after percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 24(6):610–614CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sankar WN et al (2007) Loss of pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: causes and prevention. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(4):713–717CrossRef Sankar WN et al (2007) Loss of pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: causes and prevention. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(4):713–717CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wilkins KE (1990) The operative management of supracondylar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 21(2):269–289PubMed Wilkins KE (1990) The operative management of supracondylar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 21(2):269–289PubMed
9.
go back to reference Karamitopoulos MS et al (2012) Postoperative radiographs after pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: are they necessary? J Pediatr Orthop 32(7):672–674CrossRefPubMed Karamitopoulos MS et al (2012) Postoperative radiographs after pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: are they necessary? J Pediatr Orthop 32(7):672–674CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109(2):145–154PubMed Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109(2):145–154PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schlechter JA, Dempewolf M (2015) The utility of radiographs prior to pin removal after operative treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Child Orthop 9(4):303–306CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schlechter JA, Dempewolf M (2015) The utility of radiographs prior to pin removal after operative treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Child Orthop 9(4):303–306CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Lim KB et al (2014) Percutaneous pin removal in the outpatient clinic–do children require analgesia?: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(7):597–602CrossRef Lim KB et al (2014) Percutaneous pin removal in the outpatient clinic–do children require analgesia?: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(7):597–602CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tay GT et al (2012) Pain during percutaneous pin removal in children with elbow fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20(3):369–370 Tay GT et al (2012) Pain during percutaneous pin removal in children with elbow fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20(3):369–370
15.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Sumeet Garg
Nikki Bloch
Micaela Cyr
Patrick Carry
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0744-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2016 Go to the issue