Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Clinical Article

Analysis of halo-orthoses application in children less than three years old

Authors: Alexandre Arkader, Harish S. Hosalkar, Denis S. Drummond, John P. Dormans

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of halo immobilization in children younger than 3 years.

Methods

All children less than 3 years of age who were placed in a halo-orthosis at a tertiary pediatric center were reviewed to determine the indications, safety, and efficacy of this method. Adequacy of immobilization and correct technique was established considering the chronology of maturation (skull and brain development). The functional outcome was analyzed.

Results

Ten patients (<3 years old) were identified from a total of 150 where halo ring/vest immobilization was used. There were six boys and four girls, with an average age of 2 years (range 10 months to 2 years and 10 months). The average time of immobilization in the halo-orthosis was 75 days (range 33–168 days), and the average follow-up time was 5 years and 2 months (range 1–12 years). There were two halo-related problems and four related to the index procedure. Halo-related problems included pin-site infection in one patient, and three pins loosening in another. There were four complications associated with the index procedure, all early in the series, including three cases of pseudarthrosis and one patient that had an insufficient decompression of basilar invagination. Two of the three failed fusions occurred at the occipito-cervical junction, which prompted us to develop new techniques for fusion at this level.

Conclusions

Halo-orthosis is a relatively safe and reliable device for immobilization of the upper cervical spine in children less than 3 years old. Understanding the developmental anatomy and a limited CT scan are helpful in pin placement. We recommend the use of a multiple pin construct, perpendicular insertion, and precise tightening with good pin-site care and frequent follow-up. The benefits seem to outweigh the risks in this population, considering the mechanical advantages of the halo-orthosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perry J, Nickel VL (1959) Total cervicalspine fusion for neck paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-A:37–60PubMed Perry J, Nickel VL (1959) Total cervicalspine fusion for neck paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-A:37–60PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mubarak SJ, Camp JF, Vuletich W, Wenger DR, Garfin SR (1989) Halo application in the infant. J Pediatr Orthop 9:612–614PubMedCrossRef Mubarak SJ, Camp JF, Vuletich W, Wenger DR, Garfin SR (1989) Halo application in the infant. J Pediatr Orthop 9:612–614PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Caird MS, Hensinger RN, Weiss N, Farley FA (2006) Complications and problems in halo treatment of toddlers: limited ambulation is recommended. J Pediatr Orthop 26:750–752PubMedCrossRef Caird MS, Hensinger RN, Weiss N, Farley FA (2006) Complications and problems in halo treatment of toddlers: limited ambulation is recommended. J Pediatr Orthop 26:750–752PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garfin SR, Roux R, Botte MJ, Centeno R, Woo SL (1986) Skull osteology as it affects halo pin placement in children. J Pediatr Orthop 6:434–436PubMedCrossRef Garfin SR, Roux R, Botte MJ, Centeno R, Woo SL (1986) Skull osteology as it affects halo pin placement in children. J Pediatr Orthop 6:434–436PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Centeno RS, Nickel VL (1985) Osteology of the skull as it affects halo pin placement. Spine 10:696–698PubMedCrossRef Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Centeno RS, Nickel VL (1985) Osteology of the skull as it affects halo pin placement. Spine 10:696–698PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Waters RL, Nickel VL (1986) Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:320–325PubMed Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Waters RL, Nickel VL (1986) Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:320–325PubMed
7.
go back to reference An HS, Riley LH III (1998) An atlas of surgery of the spine. 1st edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, NY, pp 10–12 An HS, Riley LH III (1998) An atlas of surgery of the spine. 1st edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, NY, pp 10–12
8.
go back to reference Copley LA, Dormans JP, Pepe MD, Tan V, Browne RH (2003) Accuracy and reliability of torque wrenches used for halo application in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2199–2204PubMed Copley LA, Dormans JP, Pepe MD, Tan V, Browne RH (2003) Accuracy and reliability of torque wrenches used for halo application in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2199–2204PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cohen MW, Drummond DS, Flynn JM, Pill SG, Dormans JP (2001) A technique of occipitocervical arthrodesis in children using autologous rib grafts. Spine 26:825–829PubMedCrossRef Cohen MW, Drummond DS, Flynn JM, Pill SG, Dormans JP (2001) A technique of occipitocervical arthrodesis in children using autologous rib grafts. Spine 26:825–829PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dormans JP, Drummond DS, Sutton LN, Ecker ML, Kopacz KJ (1995) Occipitocervical arthrodesis in children. A new technique and analysis of results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1234–1240PubMed Dormans JP, Drummond DS, Sutton LN, Ecker ML, Kopacz KJ (1995) Occipitocervical arthrodesis in children. A new technique and analysis of results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1234–1240PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dormans JP, Criscitiello AA, Drummond DS, Davidson RS (1995) Complications in children managed with immobilization in a halo vest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1370–1373PubMed Dormans JP, Criscitiello AA, Drummond DS, Davidson RS (1995) Complications in children managed with immobilization in a halo vest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1370–1373PubMed
12.
go back to reference Baum JA, Hanley EN Jr, Pullekines J (1989) Comparison of halo complications in adults and children. Spine 14:251–252PubMedCrossRef Baum JA, Hanley EN Jr, Pullekines J (1989) Comparison of halo complications in adults and children. Spine 14:251–252PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wong WB, Haynes RJ (1994) Osteology of the pediatric skull. Considerations of halo pin placement. Spine 19:1451–1454PubMedCrossRef Wong WB, Haynes RJ (1994) Osteology of the pediatric skull. Considerations of halo pin placement. Spine 19:1451–1454PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Segal LS, Drummond DS, Zanotti RM, Ecker ML, Mubarak SJ (1991) Complications of posterior arthrodesis of the cervical spine in patients who have Down syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1547–1554PubMed Segal LS, Drummond DS, Zanotti RM, Ecker ML, Mubarak SJ (1991) Complications of posterior arthrodesis of the cervical spine in patients who have Down syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1547–1554PubMed
15.
go back to reference Copley LA, Pepe MD, Tan V, Dormans JP, Gabriel JP, Sheth NP, Asada N (1998) A comparative evaluation of halo pin designs in an immature skull model. Clin Orthop:212–218 Copley LA, Pepe MD, Tan V, Dormans JP, Gabriel JP, Sheth NP, Asada N (1998) A comparative evaluation of halo pin designs in an immature skull model. Clin Orthop:212–218
16.
go back to reference Copley LA, Pepe MD, Tan V, Sheth N, Dormans JP (1999) A comparison of various angles of halo pin insertion in an immature skull model. Spine 24:1777–1780PubMedCrossRef Copley LA, Pepe MD, Tan V, Sheth N, Dormans JP (1999) A comparison of various angles of halo pin insertion in an immature skull model. Spine 24:1777–1780PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Letts M, Girouard L, Yeadon A (1997) Mechanical evaluation of four- versus eight-pin halo fixation. J Pediatr Orthop 17:121–124PubMed Letts M, Girouard L, Yeadon A (1997) Mechanical evaluation of four- versus eight-pin halo fixation. J Pediatr Orthop 17:121–124PubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of halo-orthoses application in children less than three years old
Authors
Alexandre Arkader
Harish S. Hosalkar
Denis S. Drummond
John P. Dormans
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-007-0065-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 6/2007 Go to the issue