Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Care

Developing the structure of Japan’s cancer survivorship guidelines using an expert panel and modified Delphi method

Authors: Yutaka J. Matsuoka, Ryo Okubo, Yoichi Shimizu, Katsunori Tsuji, Tomomi Narisawa, Jiichiro Sasaki, Hiroyuki Sasai, Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Takeshi Iwasa, Satoshi Iwata, Tomoyasu Kato, Kayo Kurotani, Dai Maruyama, Ayako Mori, Asao Ogawa, Naomi Sakurai, Taichi Shimazu, Chikako Shimizu, Takahiro Tabuchi, Miyako Takahashi, Toshimi Takano, Noriatsu Tatematsu, Yosuke Uchitomi, Chie Watanabe, Tsuguya Fukui

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop consensus-based components used in the first evidence-based cancer survivorship guidelines in Japan.

Methods

Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of experts in oncology clinical practice, nursing, health science, epidemiology, and patient advocacy. The panel engaged in a modified Delphi process to (1) generate consensus related to the definition of survivorship, (2) determine the aim and target users of the guideline, and (3) identify clinical issues for inclusion. A Web-based survey and panel meeting were conducted to obtain the panelists’ feedback on the initial draft proposed by the secretariat. Multiple online votes were then completed until all elements of the proposed guidelines reached an approval rate of 80% or higher. Following each round, iterative refinements were made based on all panelists’ feedback.

Results

Twenty-two experts were enrolled in the panel and participated in four rounds of online voting and two face-to-face meetings. Ultimately, the panel reached consensus on the definition of survivorship, the aim of the guidelines, and target users. Moreover, 11 of the original 17 clinical issues were retained. Finally, the panel selected two priority areas to implement immediately.

Conclusion

The panel’s consensus on the definition of survivorship, aim and target users of the guideline, and 11 clinical issues will serve as a compass for the development of comprehensive cancer survivorship guidelines in Japan.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

A culturally sensitive consensus approach was developed to improve the long term health and well- being of cancer survivors in Japan.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Center for Cancer Control and Information Service NCC J. Trends in age-specific incidence rate (1980, 2014) (in Japanese). 2018. Center for Cancer Control and Information Service NCC J. Trends in age-specific incidence rate (1980, 2014) (in Japanese). 2018.
6.
go back to reference Denlinger CS, Carlson RW, Are M, Baker KS, Davis E, Edge SB, et al. Survivorship: introduction and definition. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2014;12(1):34–45.CrossRef Denlinger CS, Carlson RW, Are M, Baker KS, Davis E, Edge SB, et al. Survivorship: introduction and definition. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2014;12(1):34–45.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, et al. Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(6):e265–81.CrossRef Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, et al. Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(6):e265–81.CrossRef
15.
20.
go back to reference Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Baker KS, Baxi S, Broderick G, Demark-Wahnefried W et al. Survivorship, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017. Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Baker KS, Baxi S, Broderick G, Demark-Wahnefried W et al. Survivorship, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017.
24.
go back to reference Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.PubMed Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Community. 1999;7(3):198–205.CrossRef Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Community. 1999;7(3):198–205.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing the structure of Japan’s cancer survivorship guidelines using an expert panel and modified Delphi method
Authors
Yutaka J. Matsuoka
Ryo Okubo
Yoichi Shimizu
Katsunori Tsuji
Tomomi Narisawa
Jiichiro Sasaki
Hiroyuki Sasai
Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
Tetsuya Hamaguchi
Takeshi Iwasa
Satoshi Iwata
Tomoyasu Kato
Kayo Kurotani
Dai Maruyama
Ayako Mori
Asao Ogawa
Naomi Sakurai
Taichi Shimazu
Chikako Shimizu
Takahiro Tabuchi
Miyako Takahashi
Toshimi Takano
Noriatsu Tatematsu
Yosuke Uchitomi
Chie Watanabe
Tsuguya Fukui
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00840-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine