Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018

Fatigue and depressive symptoms improve but remain negatively related to work functioning over 18 months after return to work in cancer patients

Authors: H. F. Dorland, F. I. Abma, S. K. R. Van Zon, R. E. Stewart, B. C. Amick, A. V. Ranchor, C. A. M. Roelen, U. Bültmann

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study are to investigate the course of work functioning, health status, and work-related factors among cancer patients during 18 months after return to work (RTW) and to examine the associations between these variables and work functioning over time.

Methods

Data were used from the 18-month longitudinal “Work Life after Cancer” (WOLICA) cohort, among 384 cancer patients who resumed work. Linear mixed models were performed to examine the different courses during 18-month follow-up. Linear regression analyses with generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the associations and interactions.

Results

Cancer patients reported an increase of work functioning and a decrease of fatigue and depressive symptoms in the first 12 months, followed by a stable course between 12 and 18 months. Cognitive symptoms were stable during the first 18 months. Working hours increased and social support decreased during the first 6 months; both remained stable between 6 and 18 months. Fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms were negatively associated with work functioning over time; working hours and supervisor social support were positively associated.

Conclusions

Interventions to improve cancer patients’ work functioning over time might be promising if they are aimed at reducing fatigue, depressive symptoms, cognitive symptoms, and encouraging supervisor social support.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

It is important to monitor cancer patients not only in the period directly after RTW but up to 18 months after RTW, allowing for timely interventions when needed.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ries LAG, Melberg D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2004. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007. Ries LAG, Melberg D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2004. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol. 2011;77:109–30.CrossRef Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol. 2011;77:109–30.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moore HCF. An overview of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction, or 'chemobrain. Oncology (Williston Park). 2014;28:797–804. Moore HCF. An overview of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction, or 'chemobrain. Oncology (Williston Park). 2014;28:797–804.
6.
go back to reference Amick BC, Lerner D, Rogers WH, et al. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25:3152.CrossRefPubMed Amick BC, Lerner D, Rogers WH, et al. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25:3152.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Amick BC, Gimeno D. Measuring work outcomes with a focus on health-related work productivity loss. In: Wittink H, Carr D, editors. Pain management: evidence, outcomes, and quality of life: a sourcebook. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 329–43. Amick BC, Gimeno D. Measuring work outcomes with a focus on health-related work productivity loss. In: Wittink H, Carr D, editors. Pain management: evidence, outcomes, and quality of life: a sourcebook. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 329–43.
8.
go back to reference Abma FI, van der Klink, Bültmann U. The work role functioning questionnaire 2.0 (dutch version): examination of its reliability, validity and responsiveness in the general working population. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:135–47.CrossRefPubMed Abma FI, van der Klink, Bültmann U. The work role functioning questionnaire 2.0 (dutch version): examination of its reliability, validity and responsiveness in the general working population. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:135–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
17.
go back to reference Twisk J. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology, a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Twisk J. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology, a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
24.
go back to reference Munir F, Burrows J, Yarker J, et al. Women’s perceptions of chemotherapy-induced cognitive side affects on work ability: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:1362–70.CrossRefPubMed Munir F, Burrows J, Yarker J, et al. Women’s perceptions of chemotherapy-induced cognitive side affects on work ability: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:1362–70.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Leijten F, van den Heuvel S, Geuskens G, et al. How do older employees with health problems remain productive at work?: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:115–24.CrossRefPubMed Leijten F, van den Heuvel S, Geuskens G, et al. How do older employees with health problems remain productive at work?: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:115–24.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Munir F, Randall R, Yarker J, et al. The influence of employer support on employee management of chronic health conditions at work. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:333–44.CrossRefPubMed Munir F, Randall R, Yarker J, et al. The influence of employer support on employee management of chronic health conditions at work. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:333–44.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fatigue and depressive symptoms improve but remain negatively related to work functioning over 18 months after return to work in cancer patients
Authors
H. F. Dorland
F. I. Abma
S. K. R. Van Zon
R. E. Stewart
B. C. Amick
A. V. Ranchor
C. A. M. Roelen
U. Bültmann
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0676-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine