Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2009

01-12-2009

Patterns of confidant use among patients and spouses in the year after breast cancer

Authors: Elizabeth Maunsell, Stéphane Guay, Évelyne Yandoma, Michel Dorval, Sophie Lauzier, Louise Provencher, André Robidoux

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We describe the frequency of, satisfaction with, and characteristics associated with confidant use among patients and their spouse in the year after diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

In a prospective study of 308 women diagnosed in 1996–97 in Quebec and their spouses, participants were interviewed about confidant use 2 weeks, 3 and 12 months after treatment start. Study completion among eligible individuals was high (patients, 86%; spouses, 84%).

Results

Compared to before diagnosis when 55% of patients reported confiding in ≥1 individuals, 84% reported confiding since diagnosis when interviewed 2 weeks after treatment start (prevalence ratio (PR2 weeks) = 1.43, p < 0.0001). Spouses reported a greater increase in confiding (PR2 weeks = 1.97, p < 0.0001). Nonetheless, spouses were significantly less likely to report confidant use at any given time (PRs comparing spouses to patients: range 0.43–0.61). The primary confidant types with increases were nurses (both couple members) and physicians (patients). Most patients and spouses (84% to 93%) were satisfied with their confidant situation. At 3 months, the woman’s having ≥2 types of adjuvant therapy predicted greater confidant use in both partners.

Conclusions

Judging from the relative differences in confidant use, the effect of diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer on natural support-seeking behaviour over time is at least as strong among spouses as among their wives.

Implications for cancer survivors

The majority of women and their spouses appear satisfied with their confidant situation, even in the first months after diagnosis when this type of support-seeking behaviour increased in both partners.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L. Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:765–77.CrossRefPubMed Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L. Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:765–77.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L, Frasure-Smith N. Randomized trial of a psychological distress screening program after breast cancer: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2747–55.PubMed Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L, Frasure-Smith N. Randomized trial of a psychological distress screening program after breast cancer: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2747–55.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Maguire P. The repercussions of mastectomy on the family. Int J Fam Psychiatry. 1981;1:485–503. Maguire P. The repercussions of mastectomy on the family. Int J Fam Psychiatry. 1981;1:485–503.
4.
go back to reference Northouse L. A longitudinal study of the adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1989;16(4):511–6.PubMed Northouse L. A longitudinal study of the adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1989;16(4):511–6.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Omne-Ponten M, Holmberg L, Bergstrom R, Sjoden PO, Burns T. Psychosocial adjustment among husbands of women treated for breast cancer; mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(10):1393–7.CrossRefPubMed Omne-Ponten M, Holmberg L, Bergstrom R, Sjoden PO, Burns T. Psychosocial adjustment among husbands of women treated for breast cancer; mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(10):1393–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Dorval M, Drolet M, Mâsse B, Deschênes L, Robidoux A, et al. Spouse and patient distress about breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2000 (suppl 2);9(90). Maunsell E, Dorval M, Drolet M, Mâsse B, Deschênes L, Robidoux A, et al. Spouse and patient distress about breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2000 (suppl 2);9(90).
7.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Dorval M, Drolet M, Mâsse B, Robidoux A, Falardeau M, et al. Spouse and patient perceptions of breast cancer intrusiveness. Psycho-Oncol. 2000;9(5 (suppl)):35. Maunsell E, Dorval M, Drolet M, Mâsse B, Robidoux A, Falardeau M, et al. Spouse and patient perceptions of breast cancer intrusiveness. Psycho-Oncol. 2000;9(5 (suppl)):35.
8.
go back to reference Cassileth BR, Hamilton JN. The family with cancer. In: Cassileth BR, editor. The cancer patient: social and medical aspects of care. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1979. p. 332. Cassileth BR, Hamilton JN. The family with cancer. In: Cassileth BR, editor. The cancer patient: social and medical aspects of care. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1979. p. 332.
9.
go back to reference Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Van Nguyen T. Reactions to family illness: theoretical models and perspectives. In: Turk DC, Kerns RD, editors. Health, illness, and families: a life-span perspective. New York: Wiley; 1985. p. 398. Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Van Nguyen T. Reactions to family illness: theoretical models and perspectives. In: Turk DC, Kerns RD, editors. Health, illness, and families: a life-span perspective. New York: Wiley; 1985. p. 398.
10.
go back to reference Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1974. Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1974.
11.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Swain MA. Adjustment of patients and husbands to the initial impact of breast cancer. Nurs Res. 1987;36(4):221–5.CrossRefPubMed Northouse LL, Swain MA. Adjustment of patients and husbands to the initial impact of breast cancer. Nurs Res. 1987;36(4):221–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schover LR. Myth-busters: telling the true story of breast cancer survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(24):1813–22.CrossRef Schover LR. Myth-busters: telling the true story of breast cancer survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(24):1813–22.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
15.
go back to reference Dakof GA, Taylor SE. Victims’ perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(1):80–9.CrossRefPubMed Dakof GA, Taylor SE. Victims’ perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(1):80–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L. Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(2):183–99.CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L. Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(2):183–99.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hoskins CN, Baker S, Sherman D, Bohlander J, Bookbinder M, Budin W, et al. Social support and patterns of adjustment to breast cancer. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1996;10(2):99–123.PubMed Hoskins CN, Baker S, Sherman D, Bohlander J, Bookbinder M, Budin W, et al. Social support and patterns of adjustment to breast cancer. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1996;10(2):99–123.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lichtman R, Taylor S, Wood J. Social support and marital adjustment after breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1987;5:47–74.CrossRef Lichtman R, Taylor S, Wood J. Social support and marital adjustment after breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1987;5:47–74.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, Oberst M. Couples’ adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis. Psycho-Oncol. 1998;7(1):37–48.CrossRef Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, Oberst M. Couples’ adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis. Psycho-Oncol. 1998;7(1):37–48.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(6):789–97.CrossRefPubMed Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(6):789–97.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dorval M, Guay S, Mondor M, Masse B, Falardeau M, Robidoux A, et al. Couples who get closer after breast cancer: frequency and predictors in a prospective investigation. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3588–96.CrossRefPubMed Dorval M, Guay S, Mondor M, Masse B, Falardeau M, Robidoux A, et al. Couples who get closer after breast cancer: frequency and predictors in a prospective investigation. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3588–96.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Northouse LL. Social support in patients‘ and husbands’ adjustment to breast cancer. Nurs Res. 1988;37(2):91–5.CrossRefPubMed Northouse LL. Social support in patients‘ and husbands’ adjustment to breast cancer. Nurs Res. 1988;37(2):91–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):250–61.CrossRefPubMed Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):250–61.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Berkman L, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. Berkman L, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
25.
go back to reference Laireiter A, Baumann U. Network structures and support functions—theoretical and empirical analyses. In: Veiel H, Baumann U, editors. The meaning and measurement of social support. New York: Hemisphere; 1992. Laireiter A, Baumann U. Network structures and support functions—theoretical and empirical analyses. In: Veiel H, Baumann U, editors. The meaning and measurement of social support. New York: Hemisphere; 1992.
26.
go back to reference Maguire P. Psychiatric morbidity associated with mastectomy. Experientia Suppl. 1982;41:373–80.PubMed Maguire P. Psychiatric morbidity associated with mastectomy. Experientia Suppl. 1982;41:373–80.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L. Social support and survival among women with breast cancer. Cancer. 1995;76(4):631–7.CrossRefPubMed Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L. Social support and survival among women with breast cancer. Cancer. 1995;76(4):631–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hoskins CN. Adjustment to breast cancer in couples. Psychol Rep. 1995;77(2):435–54.PubMed Hoskins CN. Adjustment to breast cancer in couples. Psychol Rep. 1995;77(2):435–54.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Drolet M, Coyle D, Hébert-Croteau N, Brisson J, et al. Wage losses in the year after breast cancer: extent and determinants among Canadian women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(5):321–32.CrossRefPubMed Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Drolet M, Coyle D, Hébert-Croteau N, Brisson J, et al. Wage losses in the year after breast cancer: extent and determinants among Canadian women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(5):321–32.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Addis M, Mahalik J. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003;58:5–14.CrossRefPubMed Addis M, Mahalik J. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003;58:5–14.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Neuling SJ, Winefield HR. Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(4):385–92.CrossRefPubMed Neuling SJ, Winefield HR. Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(4):385–92.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control. Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Camperdown: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2003. National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control. Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Camperdown: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2003.
34.
go back to reference Comité consultatif sur le cancer. Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer: Pour lutter efficacement contre le cancer, formons équipe (In particular, chapter: Le soutien dès l’annonce du diagnostic, pp 165–174). Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec; 1998. [French]. Comité consultatif sur le cancer. Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer: Pour lutter efficacement contre le cancer, formons équipe (In particular, chapter: Le soutien dès l’annonce du diagnostic, pp 165–174). Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec; 1998. [French].
35.
go back to reference De Serres M, Beauchesne N. L’intervenant pivot en oncologie: un rôle d’évaluation, d’information et de soutien pour le mieux-être des personnes atteintes de cancer. Québec: Conseil québécois de lutte contre le cancer; 2000. [French]. De Serres M, Beauchesne N. L’intervenant pivot en oncologie: un rôle d’évaluation, d’information et de soutien pour le mieux-être des personnes atteintes de cancer. Québec: Conseil québécois de lutte contre le cancer; 2000. [French].
Metadata
Title
Patterns of confidant use among patients and spouses in the year after breast cancer
Authors
Elizabeth Maunsell
Stéphane Guay
Évelyne Yandoma
Michel Dorval
Sophie Lauzier
Louise Provencher
André Robidoux
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0096-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine