Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 1/2009

01-03-2009

Screening mammography rate and predictors following treatment for colorectal cancer

Authors: A. Marshall McBean, Xinhua Yu, Beth A. Virnig

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer survivors remain at risk for breast cancer. Thus, it is important to determine if screening mammography rates are reduced by the diagnosis and treatment of incident colorectal cancer.

Methods

Mammography rates among 7,666 67–79 year-old stage 0-III colorectal cancer survivors were compared with rates among 36,433 age-, race/ethnicity-, SEER area-matched women controlling for pre-diagnosis mammography, stage, chemotherapy, income, co-morbidities, treatment in teaching hospital, number of physician visits, and gynecologist visits.

Results

In the first 2 years after diagnosis, the survivors’ rate (49.7/100) was 4.2% higher than the controls’ (47.6/100), p < 0.001. It was 7.5% higher in the next 2 years, 54.5/100 versus 49.7/100, p < 0.001. The higher rates resulted from significantly greater rates among survivors without prior mammography, 30.9/100, compared with their controls (25.3/100) in the first 2 years, for example (O.R. = 1.23, 95% C.I. = 1.15–1.32). The strongest predictors of post-diagnosis mammography were pre-diagnosis mammography (O.R. = 5.76, 95% C.I. = 5.19–6.38), visiting a gynecologist (O.R. = 1.83, 95% C.I. = 1.55–2.16), chemotherapy (O.R. = 1.61, 95% C.I. = 1.40–1.86), and more than nine physician visits. Increasing Charlson scores and cancer stage were associated with lower mammography rates.

Discussion/Conclusions

Overall, the competing demands of cancer diagnosis and treatment did not reduce mammography rates, and these events were associated with increased rates among previous non-users.

Implications for cancer survivors

The low mammography rate among survivors with no history of a prior mammogram means that the physicians treating these women must emphasize the need for such care.
Literature
2.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics.Health, United States, 2007. With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD; 2007. National Center for Health Statistics.Health, United States, 2007. With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Weinberg DS, Newschaffer CJ, Topham A. Risk for colorectal cancer after gynecologic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:189–93.PubMed Weinberg DS, Newschaffer CJ, Topham A. Risk for colorectal cancer after gynecologic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:189–93.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ahmed F, Goodman MT, Kosary C, Ruiz B, Wu XC, Chen VW, et al. Excess risk of subsequent primary cancers among colorectal carcinoma survivors, 1975-2001. Cancer. 2006;107(5, Suppl):1162–71. doi:10.1002/cncr.22013.PubMedCrossRef Ahmed F, Goodman MT, Kosary C, Ruiz B, Wu XC, Chen VW, et al. Excess risk of subsequent primary cancers among colorectal carcinoma survivors, 1975-2001. Cancer. 2006;107(5, Suppl):1162–71. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​22013.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA. orrelates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:2093–101. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0301.CrossRef Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA. orrelates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:2093–101. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-06-0301.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McBean AM, Yu X, Virnig BA. The use of preventive health services among elderly uterine cancer survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:86 e81–8.CrossRef McBean AM, Yu X, Virnig BA. The use of preventive health services among elderly uterine cancer survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:86 e81–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:166–71.PubMed Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:166–71.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Cullen J, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Kwan L, et al. Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:77–84. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.2681.PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Cullen J, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Kwan L, et al. Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:77–84. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​02.​2681.PubMedCrossRef
14.
16.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40(8, Suppl):IV-3–IV-18. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40(8, Suppl):IV-3–IV-18.
17.
go back to reference Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, Virnig BA, Freeman JL, Klabunde CN, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002;40(8, Suppl):IV-55–IV-61. Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, Virnig BA, Freeman JL, Klabunde CN, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002;40(8, Suppl):IV-55–IV-61.
19.
21.
go back to reference Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR, Cohen AM, Figueredo AT, Flynn PJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3408–19. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.05.063.PubMedCrossRef Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR, Cohen AM, Figueredo AT, Flynn PJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3408–19. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​05.​063.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, Melle GV, Norris CM, Faris PD, et al. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286:1494–7. doi:10.1001/jama.286.12.1494.PubMedCrossRef Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, Melle GV, Norris CM, Faris PD, et al. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286:1494–7. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​286.​12.​1494.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3 rd ed). Jossey-Bass; 2002. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (3 rd ed). Jossey-Bass; 2002.
Metadata
Title
Screening mammography rate and predictors following treatment for colorectal cancer
Authors
A. Marshall McBean
Xinhua Yu
Beth A. Virnig
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0080-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 1/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine