Top

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2009 | Original Article

Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result?

Authors: Byron E. Chalidis, George E. Petsatodis, Nick C. Sachinis, Christos G. Dimitriou, Anastasios G. Christodoulou

Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction | Issue 2/2009

Abstract

The need for reaming and the number of locking screws to be used in intramedullary (IM) tibial nailing of acute fractures as well as routine bone grafting of tibial aseptic nonunions have not been clearly defined. We describe the results of reamed interlocked IM nails in 233 patients with 247 tibial fractures (190 closed, 27 open and 30 nonunions). Ninety-six percent of the fractures were united at review after an average of 4.9 years. No correlation was found between union and nail diameter (P = 0.501) or the number of locking screws used (P = 0.287). Nail dynamization was effective in 82% of fractures. Locking screw(s) breakage was associated with nonunion in 25% of cases. Bone grafting during IM nailing was found not to increase the healing rate in tibial nonunions (P = 0.623). None of the IM nails were removed or revised due to infection. A dropped hallux and postoperative compartment syndrome were found in 0.8 and 1.6% of cases, respectively. Anterior knee pain was reported in 42% of patients but nail removal did not alleviate the symptoms in almost half. This series confirms the place of reamed intramedullary nailing for the vast majority of tibial diaphyseal fractures. It provides an optimum outcome and minimizes the need for supplementary bone grafting in aseptic nonunions.

Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM (1997) Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:640–646CrossRefPubMed

Finkemeier CG, Schmidt AH, Kyle RF, Templeman DC, Varecka TF (2000) A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 14:187–193CrossRefPubMed

Keating JF, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM (1997) Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for open fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:334–341CrossRefPubMed

Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, SM P (1991) Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRef

Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN (1984) Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 24:742–746CrossRefPubMed

Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Orthop Trauma 18:96–101CrossRefPubMed

Larsen LB, Madsen JE, Hoiness PR, Ovre S (2004) Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years’ follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 18:144–149CrossRefPubMed

Klein MP, Rahn BA, Frigg R, Kessler S, Perren SM (1990) Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing: interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:314–316CrossRefPubMed

Schemitsch EH, Kowalski MJ, Swiontkowski MF, Senft D (1994) Cortical bone blood flow in reamed and unreamed locked intramedullary nailing: a fractured tibia model in sheep. J Orthop Trauma 8:373–382CrossRefPubMed

10.

Reichert IL, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP (1995) The acute vascular response to intramedullary reaming. Microsphere estimation of blood flow in the intact ovine tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:490–493CrossRefPubMed

11.

Frolke JP, Nulend JK, Semeins CM, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJ (2004) Viable osteoblastic potential of cortical reamings from intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Res 22:1271–1275CrossRefPubMed

12.

Wenisch S, Trinkaus K, Hild A, Hose D, Herde K, Heiss C, Kilian O, Alt V, Schnettler R (2005) Human reaming debris: a source of multipotent stem cells. Bone 36:74–83CrossRefPubMed

13.

Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, Christie J, McQueen MM (1995) Exchange intramedullary nailing. Its use in aseptic tibial nonunion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:407–411CrossRefPubMed

14.

Keating JF, O’Brien PI, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM (1997) Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 338:182–191CrossRef

15.

Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH (2001) Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:62–68CrossRefPubMed

16.

Georgiadis GM, Minster GJ, Moed BR (1990) Effects of dynamization after interlocking tibial nailing: an experimental study in dogs. J Orthop Trauma 4:323–330CrossRefPubMed

17.

Egger EL, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Palmer J, Aro HT, Chao EY (1993) Effects of axial dynamization on bone healing. J Trauma 34:185–192CrossRefPubMed

18.

Phieffer LS, Goulet JA (2006) Delayed unions of the tibia. Instr Course Lect 55:389–401PubMed

19.

Nassif JM, Gorczyca JT, Cole JK, Pugh KJ, Pienkowski D (2000) Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 14:554–558CrossRefPubMed

20.

McQueen MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM (1990) Compartment pressures after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:395–397CrossRefPubMed

21.

Robinson CM, O’Donnell J, Will E, Keating JF (1999) Dropped hallux after the intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:481–484CrossRefPubMed

22.

Toivanen JA, Vaisto O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ (2002) Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:580–585CrossRefPubMed

23.

Bhattacharyya T, Seng K, Nassif NA, Freedman I (2006) Knee pain after tibial nailing: the role of nail prominence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 449:303–307CrossRefPubMed

24.

Cartwright-Terry M, Snow M, Nalwad H (2007) The severity and prediction of anterior knee pain post tibial nail insertion. J Orthop Trauma 21:381–385CrossRefPubMed

25.

Brinker MR, O’Connor DP (2007) Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:177–188CrossRefPubMed

Title: Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result?
Authors: Byron E. Chalidis
George E. Petsatodis
Nick C. Sachinis
Christos G. Dimitriou
Anastasios G. Christodoulou
Publication date: 01-10-2009
Publisher: Springer Milan
Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1828-8936
Electronic ISSN: 1828-8928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-009-0065-0

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result?

Abstract

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

The use of a retrograde fixed-angle intramedullary nail for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis after severe loss of the talus

Principles of the therapy of bone infections in adult extremities

Intramuscular myxoma of the hypothenar muscles

Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the bioabsorbable Milagro™ interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Treatment of chronically unreduced complex dislocations of the elbow

Fixation of subtrochanteric fractures