Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2023

04-07-2023 | Rectal Cancer | Research

Propensity matched analysis of robotic and laparoscopic operations for mid-low rectal cancer: short-term comparison of anal function and oncological outcomes

Authors: Ruiqi Li, Jiajie Zhou, Shuai Zhao, Qiannan Sun, Daorong Wang

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 5/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, while in some respects equivalent or even preferable to open surgery, is challenged in specific conditions where the tumor is located in the middle and lower third of the rectum. Robotic surgery equipped with a superior arm of machinery and gained better visualization can compensate for the deficiency of the laparoscopic approach. This study adopted a propensity matched analysis to compare the functional and oncological short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic surgery. All patients who underwent proctectomy have been collected prospectively between December 2019 and November 2022. After censoring for inclusion criteria, we performed a propensity matching analysis. A detailed collection of post-operative examination indicators was performed, while the K–M survival curves were plotted to analyze post-operative oncology outcomes. The LARS scale was designed to evaluate the anal function of patients in the form of questionnaires. Totally, 215 patients underwent robotic operations while 1011 patients selected laparoscopic operations. Patients matched 1∶1 by propensity score were divided into the robotic and laparoscopic groups, 210 cases were included in each group. All patients underwent a follow‐up for a median period of 18.3 months. Robotic surgery was connected with an enhanced recovery including the earlier time to first flatus passage without ileostomy (P = 0.050), the earlier time to liquid diet without ileostomy (P = 0.040), lower incidence of urinary retention (P = 0.043), better anal function 1 month after LAR without ileostomy (P < 0.001), longer operative time (\P = 0.042), compared with laparoscopic operations. The oncological outcomes and occurrence of other complications were comparable between the two approaches. For mid-low rectal cancer, robotic surgery could be recognized as an effective technique with identical short-term outcomes of oncology and better anal function in comparison to laparoscopic surgery. However, multi-center studies with larger samples are expected to validate the long-term outcomes of robotic surgery.
Literature
1.
2.
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRefPubMed
3.
van der Pas MHGM et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRefPubMed
4.
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
5.
Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16:1389–1402CrossRefPubMed
6.
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. JAMA 318(16):1569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24(11):2888–2894CrossRefPubMed
8.
No authors listed (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group. Surg Endosc 14:896–901 CrossRef
9.
Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH et al (2008) Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc 22:792–797CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2014) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Bonjer HJ, Hop WCJ, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMed
16.
Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed
17.
Reames BN, Sheetz KH, Waits SA, Dimick JB, Regenbogen SE (2014) Geographic variation in use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:3667–3672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248CrossRefPubMed
19.
Pai A, Melich G, Marecik S, Park J, Prasad L (2015) Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bird’s eye view. J Min Access Surg 11(1):29–34CrossRef
20.
Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Fukushima Y et al (2014) Safety and factors contributing to the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Tech Coloproctol 18:247–255CrossRefPubMed
21.
Liu L, Wang T, Zhang G, Dai R, Liang H, Tang L (2016) Risk factors for early complications after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer: a single center experience. J Cancer Res Ther 12:350–354CrossRefPubMed
22.
Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS et al (2015) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy. Surg Endosc 29:1419–1424CrossRefPubMed
23.
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1694 (discussion 1695–6)CrossRefPubMed
24.
Bilgin IA, Bas M, Aytac E, Benlice C, Esen E, Kirbiyik E, Kiziltas C, Aghayeva A, Ozben V, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T, Baca B (2020) Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot 16(6):1–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rcs.​2168CrossRefPubMed
25.
Aselmann H, Kersebaum J-N, Röcken C, Becker T (2018) Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach—report of a single-center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1575–1581CrossRefPubMed
26.
Lin S, Jiang HG, Chen ZH, Zhou SY, Liu XS, Yu JR (2011) Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 17(47):5214–5220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Pant S, Moyers JT, Naing A (2021) Phase II, single-arm trial of preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and camrelizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 9(11):e003554CrossRef
28.
Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, Tang B, Jia B, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Zhao R, Zhang C, Cheng L, Zhang X, Liang F, He G, Wei Y, Xu J, REAL Study Group (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(11):991–1004. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2468-1253(22)00248-5
29.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43(3):659–695CrossRefPubMed
30.
Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU (2009) Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1824–1830CrossRefPubMed
31.
Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, Zhao Q, Cheng Y, Liu J (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 19:516–526CrossRefPubMed
32.
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Efect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Hino H, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Numata M, Furutani A, Yamaoka Y, Manabe S, Suzuki T, Kato S (2017) Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol 21:879–886CrossRefPubMed
34.
Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y (2009) Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2779–2786CrossRefPubMed
35.
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493CrossRefPubMed
36.
Colombo PE, Bertrand MM, Alline M et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for sphincter-saving surgery: is there any difference in the transanal TME rectal approach?: a single-center series of 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(5):1594–1600CrossRefPubMed
37.
Broholm M, Pommergaard H-C, Gogenur I (2015) Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 17:375–381CrossRefPubMed
38.
Grass JK, Chen CC, Melling N, Lingala B, Kemper M, Scognamiglio P, Persiani R, Tirelli F, Caricato M, Capolupo GT, Izbicki JR, Perez DR (2021) Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 17(6):e2329. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rcs.​2329CrossRefPubMed
39.
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A et al (2018) Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(12):1755–1762CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Propensity matched analysis of robotic and laparoscopic operations for mid-low rectal cancer: short-term comparison of anal function and oncological outcomes
Authors
Ruiqi Li
Jiajie Zhou
Shuai Zhao
Qiannan Sun
Daorong Wang
Publication date
04-07-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01656-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2023 Go to the issue

Review

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Research

Quadrifecta outcomes and their predictors following robotic radical prostatectomy: a study of newly established robotic center in India

Research

Improved accuracy of a novel fluoroscopy-based robotically assisted THA system compared to manual THA

Research

Changes in utilization of robotic bariatric surgery and effect on patient outcomes from 2015–2020

Research

Integrating a tumour appropriate transanal or robotic assisted approach to total mesorectal excision in high-volume rectal cancer practice is safe and cost-effective

Research

The safe introduction of robotic surgery in a free-standing children’s hospital